47
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Historical nectar assessment reveals the fall and rise of Britain in bloom

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Summary

          There is considerable concern over declines in insect pollinator communities and potential impacts on the pollination of crops and wildflowers 14 . Among the multiple pressures facing pollinators 24 , decreasing floral resources due to habitat loss and degradation has been suggested as a key contributing factor 28 . However, a lack of quantitative data has hampered testing for historical changes in floral resources. Here we show that overall floral rewards can be estimated at a national scale by combining vegetation surveys and direct nectar measurements. We find evidence for substantial losses in nectar resources in England and Wales between the 1930s and 1970s; however, total nectar provision in Great Britain as a whole had stabilised by 1978, and increased from 1998 to 2007. These findings concur with trends in pollinator diversity, which declined in the mid-20th century 9 but stabilised more recently 10 . The diversity of nectar sources declined from 1978 to 1990 but stabilised thereafter at low levels, with four plant species accounting for over 50% of national nectar provision in 2007. Calcareous grassland, broadleaved woodland and neutral grassland are the habitats that produce the greatest amount of nectar per unit area from the most diverse sources, whereas arable land is the poorest in both respects. While agri-environment schemes add resources to arable landscapes, their national contribution is low. Due to their large area, improved grasslands could add substantially to national nectar provision if they were managed to increase floral resource provision. This national-scale assessment of floral resource provision brings new insights into the links between plant and pollinator declines, and offers considerable opportunities for conservation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Long-term global trends in crop yield and production reveal no current pollination shortage but increasing pollinator dependency.

          There is evidence that pollinators are declining as a result of local and global environmental degradation [1-4]. Because a sizable proportion of the human diet depends directly or indirectly on animal pollination [5], the issue of how decreases in pollinator stocks could affect global crop production is of paramount importance [6-8]. Using the extensive FAO data set [9], we compared 45 year series (1961-2006) in yield, and total production and cultivated area of pollinator-dependent and nondependent crops [5]. We investigated temporal trends separately for the developed and developing world because differences in agricultural intensification, and socioeconomic and environmental conditions might affect yield and pollinators [10-13]. Since 1961, crop yield (Mt/ha) has increased consistently at average annual growth rates of approximately 1.5%. Temporal trends were similar between pollinator-dependent and nondependent crops in both the developed and developing world, thus not supporting the view that pollinator shortages are affecting crop yield at the global scale. We further report, however, that agriculture has become more pollinator dependent because of a disproportionate increase in the area cultivated with pollinator-dependent crops. If the trend toward favoring cultivation of pollinator-dependent crops continues, the need for the service provided by declining pollinators will greatly increase in the near future.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The role of resources and risks in regulating wild bee populations.

            Recent declines of bee species have led to great interest in preserving and promoting bee populations for agricultural and wild plant pollination. Many correlational studies have examined the indirect effects of factors such as landscape context and land management practices and found great variation in bee response. We focus here on the evidence for effects of direct factors (i.e., food resources, nesting resources, and incidental risks) regulating bee populations and then interpret varied responses to indirect factors through their species-specific and habitat-specific effects on direct factors. We find strong evidence for food resource availability regulating bee populations, but little clear evidence that other direct factors are commonly limiting. We recommend manipulative experiments to illuminate the effects of these different factors. We contend that much of the variation in impact from indirect factors, such as grazing, can be explained by the relationships between indirect factors and floral resource availability based on environmental circumstances.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW-European pollinators and plants

              Concern about biodiversity loss has led to increased public investment in conservation. Whereas there is a widespread perception that such initiatives have been unsuccessful, there are few quantitative tests of this perception. Here, we evaluate whether rates of biodiversity change have altered in recent decades in three European countries (Great Britain, Netherlands and Belgium) for plants and flower visiting insects. We compared four 20-year periods, comparing periods of rapid land-use intensification and natural habitat loss (1930–1990) with a period of increased conservation investment (post-1990). We found that extensive species richness loss and biotic homogenisation occurred before 1990, whereas these negative trends became substantially less accentuated during recent decades, being partially reversed for certain taxa (e.g. bees in Great Britain and Netherlands). These results highlight the potential to maintain or even restore current species assemblages (which despite past extinctions are still of great conservation value), at least in regions where large-scale land-use intensification and natural habitat loss has ceased.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                25 December 2015
                4 February 2016
                04 August 2016
                : 530
                : 7588
                : 85-88
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Bristol Life Sciences Building, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ United Kingdom.
                [2 ]Faculty of Biological Sciences, University of Leeds, Leeds LS2 9JT, United Kingdom.
                [3 ]Fera Science Ltd., Sand Hutton, York, YO41 1LZ, United Kingdom.
                [4 ]NERC Center for Ecology & Hydrology, Library Avenue, Bailrigg, Lancaster, LA1 4AP, United Kingdom.
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to M.B. ( mathilde.baude@ 123456univ-orleans.fr )
                [†]

                Current address: Collegium Sciences et Techniques EA 1207 LBLGC, Université d’Orléans, F-45067, Orléans, France.

                Author Contributions

                The study was conceived by W.E.K. and J.M. The field survey was carried out by M.B. and N.D. with the help of J.M. The data were compiled and analysed by M.B. with suggestions from W.E.K., J.M., S.S., R.D.M. and M.G. Vegetation data from the Countryside Survey database were extracted by S.S. Agri-environment scheme data were provided and analysed by N.D.B. and S.C. The national maps were generated by R.D.M. All authors discussed the results and contributed during manuscript writing.

                Article
                EMS66382
                10.1038/nature16532
                4756436
                26842058
                04f82c86-ee57-4490-a83b-34244846209a

                Reprints and permissions information is available at www.nature.com/reprints.

                Users may view, print, copy, and download text and data-mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article