3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Incidence and relative risk of metachronous second primary cancers for 16 cancer sites, Osaka, Japan, 2000–2015: Population‐based analysis

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          An increasing number of cancer survivors have developed multiple primaries. This study aims to describe the incidence and risk patterns of metachronous second primary cancers (SPCs) in Osaka, Japan.

          Methods

          Data were obtained from the Osaka Cancer Registry, a population‐based database of all cancers diagnosed in Osaka. The study subjects were individuals who were first diagnosed with invasive cancers in 16 major cancer sites during 2000–2014, aged 15–79 years, survived at least 3 months, and were followed up for 10 years. We measured incidence rates, cumulative risks, and standardized incidence ratios (SIRs: with the Osaka general population as the referent) of developing SPCs during 3 months to 10 years after the first diagnosis.

          Results

          During 2000–2015, among 418,791 cancer survivors, 24,368 (5.8%) developed SPCs within 10 years of first diagnosis. Males had higher incidence rates than females except among young‐onset survivors (aged 15–39 years). 10‐year cumulative risks among survivors aged 70–79 years (the most dominant age group) were 24.0% (male) and 11.8% (female). 10‐year SIRs were 1.38 (95% CI, 1.36–1.40; male) and 1.44 (95% CI, 1.41–1.48; female) with higher estimates among younger survivors in both sexes. Strong bidirectional associations were observed between oral/pharyngeal, esophageal, and laryngeal cancers. Survivors of any smoking‐related cancers had elevated SIRs of developing smoking‐related SPCs. Similar results were observed for alcohol‐related cancers.

          Conclusions

          Cancer survivors are at excess risk of developing SPCs compared to the general population. Continued surveillance is warranted to inform survivorship care through risk‐based long‐term care planning and lifestyle‐changing efforts to prevent new cancers.

          Abstract

          During 2000–2015, 5.8% of cancer survivors in Osaka, Japan, developed metachronous second primary cancers (SPCs) within 10 years of first diagnosis. Cancer survivors were at 1.38 times (male) and 1.44 times (female) higher risks of developing SPCs compared to the general population. Coordinated efforts of survivorship care through risk‐based care planning, surveillance, and lifestyle‐changing interventions are warranted.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Factors Associated With Death in Critically Ill Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019 in the US

          The US is currently an epicenter of the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) pandemic, yet few national data are available on patient characteristics, treatment, and outcomes of critical illness from COVID-19.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Multiple primary tumours: challenges and approaches, a review

            When in a patient more than one tumour in the same or a different organ is diagnosed, multiple primary tumours may be present. For epidemiological studies, different definitions of multiple primaries are used with the two main definitions coming from the project Surveillance Epidemiology and End Results and the International Association of Cancer Registries and International Agency for Research on Cancer. The differences in the two definitions have to be taken into consideration when reports on multiple primaries are analysed. In this review, the literature on multiple primaries is reviewed and summarised. Overall, the frequency of multiple primaries is reported in the range of 2–17%. Aetiological factors that may predispose patients to multiple primaries can be grouped into host related, lifestyle factors and environmental influences. Some of the most common cancer predisposition syndromes based on a clinical presentation are discussed and the relevant genetic evaluation and testing are characterised. Importantly, from a clinical standpoint, clinical situations when multiple primaries should be suspected and ruled out in a patient are discussed. Furthermore, general principles and possible treatment strategies for patients with synchronous and metachronous multiple primary tumours are highlighted.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Clinical responses to EGFR-tyrosine kinase inhibitor retreatment in non-small cell lung cancer patients who benefited from prior effective gefitinib therapy: a retrospective analysis

              Background Gefitinib was the first epidermal growth factor receptor-tyrosine kinase inhibitor (EGFR-TKI) approved for the treatment of advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC). Few treatment options are available for NSCLC patients who have responded to gefitinib treatment and demonstrated tumor progression. The present study was conducted to evaluate the efficacy and toxicity of the 2nd EGFR-TKI administration. Methods We retrospectively analyzed 11 patients who had obtained a partial response (PR) or stable disease (SD) with gefitinib treatment and were re-treated with EGFR-TKI after failure of the initial gefitinib treatment. Results Three patients (27%) were treated with gefitinib as the 2nd EGFR-TKI, and 8 patients (73%) received erlotinib. Only one patient (9%) showed PR, 7 (64%) achieved SD, and 3 (27%) had progressive disease. The disease control rate was 73% (95% CI, 43% - 91%) and the median progression-free survival was 3.4 months (95% CI, 2 - 5.2). The median overall survival from the beginning of the 2nd EGFR-TKI and from diagnosis were 7.3 months (95% CI, 2.7 - 13) and 36.7 months (95% CI, 23.6 - 43.9), respectively. No statistical differences in PFS or OS were observed between gefitinib and erlotinib as the 2nd EGFR-TKI (PFS, P = 0.23 and OS, P = 0.052). The toxicities associated with the 2nd EGFR-TKI were generally acceptable and comparable to those observed for the initial gefitinib therapy. Conclusions Our results indicate that a 2nd EGFR-TKI treatment can be an effective treatment option for gefitinib responders.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                satomi.odani@oici.jp
                Journal
                Cancer Med
                Cancer Med
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7634
                CAM4
                Cancer Medicine
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7634
                29 November 2021
                January 2022
                : 11
                : 2 ( doiID: 10.1002/cam4.v11.2 )
                : 507-519
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Cancer Control Center Osaka International Cancer Institute Osaka Japan
                [ 2 ] Division of Cancer Medicine Graduate School of Medicine Osaka University Osaka Japan
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Satomi Odani, Cancer Control Center, Osaka International Cancer Institute, 3‐1‐69 Chuoku Otemae, Osaka 541‐8567, Japan.

                Email: satomi.odani@ 123456oici.jp

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6263-4952
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-1050-3125
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-9782-8637
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0747-3287
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4161-2970
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7786-4910
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3816-8303
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7728-8853
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-2575-4971
                Article
                CAM44457
                10.1002/cam4.4457
                8729047
                34845852
                0512b386-acf4-44f0-87bb-49c64c891ffc
                © 2021 The Authors. Cancer Medicine published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 01 November 2021
                : 25 August 2021
                : 01 November 2021
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 3, Pages: 13, Words: 9917
                Funding
                Funded by: Ministry of Health, Labour and Welfare , doi 10.13039/501100003478;
                Award ID: H30‐Gantaisaku‐ippan‐009
                Award ID: 20EA1026
                Categories
                Research Article
                Cancer Prevention
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                January 2022
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.7.0 mode:remove_FC converted:05.01.2022

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                alcohol‐related cancer,cumulative risk,epidemiology,incidence rate,multiple primary cancers,smoking‐related cancer,standardized incidence ratio

                Comments

                Comment on this article