8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Attitudes towards assisted dying are influenced by question wording and order: a survey experiment

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Surveys on attitudes towards assisted dying play an important role in informing public debate, policy and legislation. Unfortunately, surveys are often designed with insufficient attention to framing effects; that is, effects on the respondents’ stated attitudes caused by question wording and context. The purpose of this study was to demonstrate and measure such framing effects.

          Methods

          Survey experiment in which an eight-question survey on attitudes towards assisted dying was distributed to Norwegian citizens through a web-based panel. Two variations of question wording as well as two variations of question order were employed. Respondents were randomized to receive one of four questionnaire versions.

          Results

          Three thousand and fifty responses were received. There were moderate to large question wording and question order effects. A majority of Norwegian citizens favour the legalization of assisted dying for patients with terminal or chronic disease.

          Conclusions

          Stakeholders in the assisted dying debate need to acknowledge potential framing effects, and accordingly should interpret survey results with caution. The same holds for researchers who conduct attitude surveys in the field of bioethics.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s12910-016-0107-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Framing Theory

          We review the meaning of the concept of framing, approaches to studying framing, and the effects of framing on public opinion. After defining framing and framing effects, we articulate a method for identifying frames in communication and a psychological model for understanding how such frames affect public opinion. We also discuss the relationship between framing and priming, outline future research directions, and describe the normative implications of framing.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Nonresponse Rates and Nonresponse Bias in Household Surveys

            R. Groves (2006)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Innovations in Experimental Design in Attitude Surveys

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                magelssen@gmail.com
                Journal
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Med Ethics
                BMC Medical Ethics
                BioMed Central (London )
                1472-6939
                27 April 2016
                27 April 2016
                2016
                : 17
                : 24
                Affiliations
                [ ]Centre for Medical Ethics, Institute of Health and Society, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
                [ ]Department of Strategy and Management, Norwegian School of Economics, Bergen, Norway
                [ ]Department of Philosophy and Religious Studies, Faculty of Humanities, Norwegian University of Science and Technology (NTNU), Trondheim, Norway
                Article
                107
                10.1186/s12910-016-0107-3
                4848799
                27121374
                0530d5cd-9452-4fd0-98ba-cc77e95529d1
                © Magelssen et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 18 December 2015
                : 21 April 2016
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Medicine
                assisted dying,euthanasia,opinion poll,physician-assisted suicide,survey experiment
                Medicine
                assisted dying, euthanasia, opinion poll, physician-assisted suicide, survey experiment

                Comments

                Comment on this article