16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of β‐Blockers Beyond 3 Years After Acute Myocardial Infarction

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          The optimal duration of β‐blocker therapy in patients with acute myocardial infarction ( AMI) is unknown. We aimed to evaluate the late effect of β‐blockers in patients with AMI.

          Methods and Results

          We enrolled all consecutive patients who presented with AMI at Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, between June 3, 2003 and February 24, 2015. The primary end point was 5‐year all‐cause mortality, depending on the use of β‐blockers at discharge, 1 year after AMI, and 3 years after AMI. Of 2592 patients, the prescription rates of β‐blockers were 72%, 69%, 63%, and 60% at discharge and 1, 3, and 5 years after AMI, respectively. The patients who were receiving β‐blocker therapy had more favorable clinical characteristics, such as younger age (62 versus 65 years; P<0.001). They received reperfusion therapy more often (92% versus 80%; P<0.001) than those without β‐blocker prescription. In the univariate analysis, the patients with β‐blocker prescription had lower 5‐year mortality at all time points. In the Cox model after adjustment for significant covariates, β‐blocker prescription at discharge was associated with a 29% reduced mortality risk (hazard ratio, 0.71; 95% confidence interval, 0.55–0.90; P=0.006); however, β‐blocker prescriptions at 1 and 3 years after AMI were not associated with reduced mortality.

          Conclusions

          The beneficial effect of β‐blocker therapy after AMI may be limited until 1 year after AMI. Whether late β‐blocker therapy beyond 1 year after AMI offers clinical benefits should be confirmed in further clinical trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references26

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The Cardiac Insufficiency Bisoprolol Study II (CIBIS-II): a randomised trial.

            In patients with heart failure, beta-blockade has improved morbidity and left-ventricular function, but the impact on survival is uncertain. We investigated the efficacy of bisoprolol, a beta1 selective adrenoceptor blocker in decreasing all-cause mortality in chronic heart failure. In a multicentre double-blind randomised placebo-controlled trial in Europe, we enrolled 2647 symptomatic patients in New York Heart Association class III or IV, with left-ventricular ejection fraction of 35% or less receiving standard therapy with diuretics and inhibitors of angiotensin-converting enzyme. We randomly assigned patients bisoprolol 1.25 mg (n=1327) or placebo (n=1320) daily, the drug being progressively increased to a maximum of 10 mg per day. Patients were followed up for a mean of 1.3 years. Analysis was by intention to treat. CIBIS-II was stopped early, after the second interim analysis, because bisoprolol showed a significant mortality benefit. All-cause mortality was significantly lower with bisoprolol than on placebo (156 [11.8%] vs 228 [17.3%] deaths with a hazard ratio of 0.66 (95% CI 0.54-0.81, p<0.0001). There were significantly fewer sudden deaths among patients on bisoprolol than in those on placebo (48 [3.6%] vs 83 [6.3%] deaths), with a hazard ratio of 0.56 (0.39-0.80, p=0.0011). Treatment effects were independent of the severity or cause of heart failure. Beta-blocker therapy had benefits for survival in stable heart-failure patients. Results should not, however, be extrapolated to patients with severe class IV symptoms and recent instability because safety and efficacy has not been established in these patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Effect of carvedilol on outcome after myocardial infarction in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction: the CAPRICORN randomised trial.

              H Dargie (2001)
              The beneficial effects of beta-blockers on long-term outcome after acute myocardial infarction were shown before the introduction of thrombolysis and angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors. Generally, the patients recruited to these trials were at low risk: few had heart failure, and none had measurements of left-ventricular function taken. We investigated the long-term efficacy of carvedilol on morbidity and mortality in patients with left-ventricular dysfunction after acute myocardial infarction treated according to current evidence-based practice. In a multicentre, randomised, placebo-controlled trial, 1959 patients with a proven acute myocardial infarction and a left-ventricular ejection fraction of
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kunson2@snu.ac.kr
                Journal
                J Am Heart Assoc
                J Am Heart Assoc
                10.1002/(ISSN)2047-9980
                JAH3
                ahaoa
                Journal of the American Heart Association: Cardiovascular and Cerebrovascular Disease
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2047-9980
                03 March 2018
                06 March 2018
                : 7
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/jah3.2018.7.issue-5 )
                : e007567
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Cardiovascular Center Seoul National University Bundang Hospital Seongnam Korea
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence to: Chang‐Hwan Yoon, MD, PhD, Cardiovascular Center, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, College of Medicine, Seoul National University, 82 Gumiro 173, Bundang, Seongnam, Korea. E‐mail: kunson2@ 123456snu.ac.kr
                Article
                JAH33014
                10.1161/JAHA.117.007567
                5866322
                29502101
                0538481a-edc1-43cf-840b-82d86efe5dee
                © 2018 The Authors. Published on behalf of the American Heart Association, Inc., by Wiley.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution‐NonCommercial License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited and is not used for commercial purposes.

                History
                : 08 September 2017
                : 25 January 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 4, Pages: 16, Words: 8388
                Funding
                Funded by: Research of Korea Centers for Disease Control and Prevention
                Award ID: 2011‐E63009‐00
                Funded by: Industrial Strategic Technology Development Program
                Award ID: 10052980
                Funded by: Ministry of Trade, Industry, and Energy
                Funded by: Korean Health Technology R&D Project, Ministry of Health and Welfare, Republic of Korea
                Award ID: HI17C1799
                Funded by: SNUBH Research Fund
                Award ID: 14‐2017‐012
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Coronary Heart Disease
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                jah33014
                06 March 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.2.2 mode:remove_FC converted:06.03.2018

                Cardiovascular Medicine
                acute myocardial infarction,β‐blocker,mortality,secondary prevention,myocardial infarction,mortality/survival,hypertension

                Comments

                Comment on this article