10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Open-Label Single-Sequence Crossover Study Evaluating Pharmacokinetics, Efficacy, and Safety of Once-Daily Dosing of Nitisinone in Patients with Hereditary Tyrosinemia Type 1

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background: Although nitisinone is successfully used to treat hereditary tyrosinemia type 1 (HT-1) with the recommended twice-daily dosing, data describing a long half-life motivate less frequent dosing. Therefore, in agreement with the Pharmacovigilance Risk Assessment Committee at the European Medicines Agency, this study was performed to investigate the switch to once-daily dosing.

          Methods: This open-label, non-randomized, single-sequence crossover study evaluated the pharmacokinetics, efficacy, and safety of once-daily compared to twice-daily dosing of nitisinone in patients with HT-1 (NCT02323529). Well-controlled patients of <2, 2 to <12, 12 to <18, and ≥18 years of age who were on twice-daily dosing were eligible for participation. Nitisinone and succinylacetone levels were determined from dry blood spots by tandem mass spectrometry. The primary endpoint was C min of nitisinone after ≥4 weeks of treatment on each dosing regimen. Secondary objectives were evaluation of efficacy and safety during each dosing regimen.

          Results: In total, 19 patients were enrolled and 17 included in the per-protocol analysis set. The mean (SD) nitisinone C min decreased by 23%, from 26.4 (10.2) to 21.2 (9.9) μmol/L in dry blood spot samples (not equivalent to plasma concentrations), when patients switched from twice- to once-daily dosing. There was no apparent age- or bodyweight-related trend in the degree of C min decrease. No patient had quantifiable succinylacetone levels during the once-daily treatment period, indicating efficacious treatment. All adverse events were mild or moderate and judged unrelated to nitisinone.

          Conclusion: The switch to once-daily treatment with nitisinone appeared efficacious and safe in the treatment of patients with HT-1.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Dosing Frequency and Medication Adherence in Chronic Disease

          BACKGROUND: Prior research has shown a decrease in medication adherence as dosing frequency increases; however, meta-analyses have not been able to demonstrate a significant inverse relationship between dosing frequency and adherence when comparing twice-daily versus once-daily dosing. OBJECTIVES: To determine the effect of scheduled dosing frequency on medication adherence in patients with chronic diseases. METHODS: A systematic literature search of Medline and Embase from January 1986 to December 2011 and a hand search of references were performed to identify eligible studies. Randomized and observational studies were included if they utilized a prospective design, assessed adult patients with chronic diseases, evaluated scheduled oral medications taken 1 to 4 times daily, and measured medication adherence for at least 1 month using an electronic monitoring device. Manual searches of reference sections of identified studies and systematic reviews were also performed to find other potentially relevant articles. Standard definitions for medication taking, regimen, and timing adherence were used and evaluated. Studies were pooled using a multivariate linear mixed-model method to conduct meta-regression accounting for both random and fixed effects, weighted 
by the inverse of the variance of medication adherence. RESULTS: Fifty-one studies, comprising 65, 76, and 47 dosing frequency arms for the taking, regimen, and timing adherence endpoints were included. Unadjusted adherence estimates were highest when the least stringent definition, taking adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 80.1%-93.0%) and lowest when the most stringent definition, timing adherence, was used (range for dosing frequencies: 18.8%-76.9%). In multivariate meta-regression analyses, the adjusted weighted mean percentage adherence rates for all regimens dosed more frequently than once per day were significantly lower compared with once-daily regimens (for 2-times, 3-times, and 4-times daily regimens, respectively: differences for taking adherence: –6.7%, –13.5%, and –19.2%; regimen adherence: –13.1%, –24.9%, and –23.1%; and timing adherence: –26.7%, –39.0%, and –54.2%). CONCLUSIONS: Patients with chronic diseases appear to be more adherent with once-daily compared with more frequently scheduled medication regimens. The use of more stringent definitions of adherence magnified these findings.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Relationship between daily dose frequency and adherence to antihypertensive pharmacotherapy: evidence from a meta-analysis.

            Rates of patient adherence (compliance) to pharmacotherapy range from 90%. Negative determinants include multiple daily dosing (MDD), chronic duration, and asymptomatic disease. Reports suggest that once-daily (QD) dosing may improve adherence, but their findings are inconclusive. The purpose of this study was to compare the rates of adherence with QD, twice-daily (BID), and MDD antihypertensive drug regimens. MEDLINE, Embase, and International Pharmaceutical Abstracts databases were searched to identify comparative trials of patient adherence to antihypertensive medication in solid, oral formulations. Data were combined using a random-effects meta-analytic model. Eight studies involving a total of 11,485 observations were included (1,830 for QD dosing, 4405 for BID dosing, 4147 for dosing >2 times daily [>BID], and 9655 for MDD), in which the primary objective was to assess adherence. The average adherence rate for QD dosing (91.4%, SD = 2.2%) was significantly higher (Z = 4.46, P BID dosing (86.3%, SD = 6.7%) was not significant (Z = 1.82, P = 0.069). The results of this meta-analysis demonstrate that with antihypertensive medications, QD dosing regimens are associated with higher rates of adherence than either BID or MDD regimens.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Recommendations for the management of tyrosinaemia type 1

              The management of tyrosinaemia type 1 (HT1, fumarylacetoacetase deficiency) has been revolutionised by the introduction of nitisinone but dietary treatment remains essential and the management is not easy. In this review detailed recommendations for the management are made based on expert opinion, published case reports and investigational studies as the evidence base is limited and there are no prospective controlled studies. The added value of this paper is that it summarises in detail current clinical knowledge about HT1 and makes recommendations for the management.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                anders.broijersen@sobi.com
                Journal
                JIMD Rep
                JIMD Rep
                JIMD Reports
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin, Heidelberg )
                2192-8304
                2192-8312
                23 June 2017
                23 June 2017
                2018
                : 38
                : 81-88
                Affiliations
                [13 ]GRID grid.414103.3, Centre de Référence des Maladies Héréditaires du Métabolisme, , Hôpital Femme Mère Enfant, ; 59 Boulevard Pinel, 69677 Bron, France
                [14 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0607 7180, GRID grid.420059.a, Swedish Orphan Biovitrum (Sobi), ; 112 76 Stockholm, Sweden
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0726 4330, GRID grid.412341.1, Div Metabolism & Childrens Res Ctr, , University Childrens Hospital, ; Zurich, Switzerland
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0459 167X, GRID grid.66875.3a, Div of Child and Adolescent Neurology, , Mayo Clinic, ; Rochester, Minnesota USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000000121901201, GRID grid.83440.3b, Genetics & Genomic Med Prog, GOSHCC, , UCL Institute of Child Health, ; London, United Kingdom
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0328 4908, GRID grid.5253.1, Managing Editor JIMD, , Univ Children´s Hospital Heidelberg, ; Heidelberg, Germany
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2217 8588, GRID grid.265219.b, Hayward Genetics Ctr,SL#31, , Tulane Univ Medical Health Ctr, ; New Orleans, Louisiana USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0000 8853 2677, GRID grid.5361.1, Division of Human Genetics, , Medical University Innsbruck, ; Innsbruck, Austria
                Author notes

                Communicated by: Johannes Hðberle

                Article
                29
                10.1007/8904_2017_29
                5874213
                28643275
                05566caf-e3db-43dd-acf7-b557aa215302
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Open Access This chapter is licensed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this chapter are included in the chapter's Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the chapter's Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder.

                History
                : 26 January 2017
                : 12 April 2017
                : 18 April 2017
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © Society for the Study of Inborn Errors of Metabolism (SSIEM) 2018

                Comments

                Comment on this article