18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Tillage and herbicide reduction mitigate the gap between conventional and organic farming effects on foraging activity of insectivorous bats

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The increased use of pesticides and tillage intensification is known to negatively affect biodiversity. Changes in these agricultural practices such as herbicide and tillage reduction have variable effects among taxa, especially at the top of the trophic network including insectivorous bats. Very few studies compared the effects of agricultural practices on such taxa, and overall, only as a comparison of conventional versus organic farming without accurately accounting for underlying practices, especially in conventional where many alternatives exist. Divergent results founded in these previous studies could be driven by this lack of clarification about some unconsidered practices inside both conventional and organic systems. We simultaneously compared, over whole nights, bat activity on contiguous wheat fields of one organic and three conventional farming systems located in an intensive agricultural landscape. The studied organic fields ( OT) used tillage (i.e., inversion of soil) without chemical inputs. In studied conventional fields, differences consisted of the following: tillage using few herbicides (T), conservation tillage (i.e., no inversion of soil) using few herbicides ( CT), and conservation tillage using more herbicide ( CTH), to control weeds. Using 64 recording sites ( OT = 12; T = 21; CT = 13; CTH = 18), we sampled several sites per system placed inside the fields each night. We showed that bat activity was always higher in OT than in T systems for two ( Pipistrellus kuhlii and Pipistrellus pipistrellus) of three species and for one ( Pipistrellus spp.) of two genera, as well as greater species richness. The same results were found for the CT versus T system comparison. CTH system showed higher activity than T for only one genus ( Pipistrellus spp.). We did not detect any differences between OT and CT systems, and CT showed higher activity than CTH system for only one species ( Pipistrellus kuhlii). Activity in OT of Pipistrellus spp. was overall 3.6 and 9.3 times higher than CTH and T systems, respectively, and 6.9 times higher in CT than T systems. Our results highlight an important benefit of organic farming and contrasted effects in conventional farming. That there were no differences detected between the organic and one conventional system is a major result. This demonstrates that even if organic farming is presently difficult to implement and requires a change of economic context for farmers, considerable and easy improvements in conventional farming are attainable, while maintaining yields and approaching the ecological benefits of organic methods.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Persistent negative effects of pesticides on biodiversity and biological control potential on European farmland

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The effects of organic agriculture on biodiversity and abundance: a meta-analysis

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mixed biodiversity benefits of agri-environment schemes in five European countries.

              Agri-environment schemes are an increasingly important tool for the maintenance and restoration of farmland biodiversity in Europe but their ecological effects are poorly known. Scheme design is partly based on non-ecological considerations and poses important restrictions on evaluation studies. We describe a robust approach to evaluate agri-environment schemes and use it to evaluate the biodiversity effects of agri-environment schemes in five European countries. We compared species density of vascular plants, birds, bees, grasshoppers and crickets, and spiders on 202 paired fields, one with an agri-environment scheme, the other conventionally managed. In all countries, agri-environment schemes had marginal to moderately positive effects on biodiversity. However, uncommon species benefited in only two of five countries and species listed in Red Data Books rarely benefited from agri-environment schemes. Scheme objectives may need to differentiate between biodiversity of common species that can be enhanced with relatively simple modifications in farming practices and diversity or abundance of endangered species which require more elaborate conservation measures.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kevin.barre@mnhn.fr
                Journal
                Ecol Evol
                Ecol Evol
                10.1002/(ISSN)2045-7758
                ECE3
                Ecology and Evolution
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                2045-7758
                30 December 2017
                February 2018
                : 8
                : 3 ( doiID: 10.1002/ece3.2018.8.issue-3 )
                : 1496-1506
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, UMR 7204 MNHN‐CNRS‐UPMC Paris France
                [ 2 ] Agrosolutions Paris France
                [ 3 ] Station de biologie marine Muséum National d'Histoire Naturelle Place de la croix Concarneau France
                [ 4 ] Ecologie Systématique Evolution, AgroParisTech CNRS, Université Paris‐Sud, Université Paris‐Saclay Orsay France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Kévin Barré, Centre d'Ecologie et des Sciences de la Conservation, Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, UMR 7204 MNHN‐CNRS‐UPMC, Paris, France.

                Email: kevin.barre@ 123456mnhn.fr

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5368-4053
                Article
                ECE33688
                10.1002/ece3.3688
                5792571
                29435227
                058ed5e4-761a-4fb3-98d8-c396d4e54d2d
                © 2017 The Authors. Ecology and Evolution published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 31 August 2017
                : 18 October 2017
                : 08 November 2017
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 3, Pages: 11, Words: 8765
                Funding
                Funded by: Region Ile‐de‐France
                Funded by: University of Paris‐Sud
                Categories
                Original Research
                Original Research
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                ece33688
                February 2018
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:version=5.3.2 mode:remove_FC converted:31.01.2018

                Evolutionary Biology
                chiroptera,farming practices,farmland biodiversity,pesticides,plowing,weed control

                Comments

                Comment on this article