7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Projected intensification of sub-daily and daily rainfall extremes in convection-permitting climate model simulations over North America: Implications for future Intensity–Duration–Frequency curves

      ,
      Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions
      Copernicus GmbH

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <p><strong>Abstract.</strong> Convection-permitting climate models have been recommended for use in projecting future changes in local-scale, short-duration rainfall extremes that are of greatest relevance to engineering and infrastructure design, e.g., as commonly summarized in Intensity&amp;ndash;Duration&amp;ndash;Frequency (IDF) curves. Based on thermodynamic arguments, it is expected that rainfall extremes will become more intense in the future. Recent evidence also suggests that shorter-duration extremes may intensify more than longer durations and that changes may depend on event rarity. Based on these general trends, will IDF curves shift upward and steepen under global warming? Will long return period extremes experience greater intensification than more common events? Projected changes in IDF curve characteristics are assessed based on sub-daily and daily outputs from historical and late 21st century pseudo-global warming convection-permitting climate model simulations over North America. To make more efficient use of the short model integrations, a parsimonious Generalized Extreme Value Simple Scaling (GEVSS) model is used to estimate historical and future IDF curves (1-hr to 24-hr durations). Simulated historical sub-daily rainfall extremes are first evaluated against in situ observations and compared with two high-resolution observationally-constrained gridded products. The climate model performs well, matching or exceeding performance of the gridded datasets. Next, inferences about future changes in GEVSS parameters are made using a Bayesian False Discovery Rate approach. Large portions of the domain experience significant increases in GEVSS location (><span class="thinspace"></span>99<span class="thinspace"></span>% of grid points), scale (><span class="thinspace"></span>88<span class="thinspace"></span>%), and scaling exponent (><span class="thinspace"></span>39<span class="thinspace"></span>%) parameters, whereas almost no significant decreases are projected to occur (<<span class="thinspace"></span>1<span class="thinspace"></span>%, <<span class="thinspace"></span>5<span class="thinspace"></span>%, and <<span class="thinspace"></span>5<span class="thinspace"></span>% respectively). The result is that IDF curves tend to shift upward, and, with the exception of the eastern United States, steepen, which leads to the largest increases in return levels for short duration extremes. The projected increase in the GEVSS scaling exponent calls into question stationarity assumptions that form the basis for existing IDF curve projections that rely exclusively on simulations at the daily time scale. When changes in return levels are scaled according to local temperature change, median scaling rates, e.g., for the 10-yr return level, are consistent with the Clausius&amp;ndash;Clapeyron (CC) relation at 1-hr to 6-hr durations, with sub-CC scaling at longer durations and modest super-CC scaling at sub-hourly durations. Further, spatially coherent but small increases in dispersion of the GEVSS distribution are found over more than half of the domain, providing some evidence for return period dependence of future changes in extreme rainfall.</p>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Natural Hazards and Earth System Sciences Discussions
          Nat. Hazards Earth Syst. Sci. Discuss.
          Copernicus GmbH
          2195-9269
          October 16 2018
          : 1-29
          Article
          10.5194/nhess-2018-290
          05adf1cc-f253-4552-9d05-f61e4f187926
          © 2018

          https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article