7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Two is more valid than one, but is six even better? The factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale (SCS)

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Self-compassion refers to a non-evaluative, interconnected and mindful attitude towards oneself especially when facing difficulties or feelings of personal inadequacies. The Self-Compassion Scale (SCS) is a frequently used instrument designed to measure self-compassion either by using the six subscale scores, or by calculating a total score, averaged across all 26 items.

          Purpose

          The purpose of this study is to examine the factor structure of the Self-Compassion Scale, and in particular, whether the widely used six-factor model and the unidimensional model can be confirmed.

          Methods

          The internal structure of the SCS was examined using confirmatory factor analysis (CFA). Six different models (a one-factor model, an oblique six-factor model, a higher-order model, an oblique two-factor model, a bi-factor model with one general factor (bifactor model) and a bi-factor model with two general factors, i.e. two-bifactor model) were tested in a sample of adolescents (n = 1725; 50.3% female; mean age = 16.56, SD = 1.95). All models were replicated using responses collected five months after the first data collection from 1497 students (W2), who were largely, but not completely, the same students involved in W1 data collection.

          Results

          Fit indices for the two-factor model implied an acceptable fit, but none of the remaining models tested met the criteria for an adequate solution. Although the fit indices for the six-factor model suggested an acceptable fit to the data, in this model the negative components of the SCS were highly correlated with each other, especially with the over-identification factor.

          Conclusion

          The results of this study provide evidence to support the use of the separate self-compassion- and self-coldness -scores rather than the overall score of the SCS. Although the fit indices supported the six-factor model, the use of six subscale scores cannot be recommended on the basis of our results given the extremely high correlations within this model between some factors.

          Related collections

          Most cited references35

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Self-Compassion: An Alternative Conceptualization of a Healthy Attitude Toward Oneself

            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Multiple Imputation After 18+ Years

              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The role of the bifactor model in resolving dimensionality issues in health outcomes measures.

              We propose the application of a bifactor model for exploring the dimensional structure of an item response matrix, and for handling multidimensionality. We argue that a bifactor analysis can complement traditional dimensionality investigations by: (a) providing an evaluation of the distortion that may occur when unidimensional models are fit to multidimensional data, (b) allowing researchers to examine the utility of forming subscales, and, (c) providing an alternative to non-hierarchical multidimensional models for scaling individual differences. To demonstrate our arguments, we use responses (N = 1,000 Medicaid recipients) to 16 items in the Consumer Assessment of Healthcare Providers and Systems (CAHPS2.0) survey. Exploratory and confirmatory factor analytic and item response theory models (unidimensional, multidimensional, and bifactor) were estimated. CAHPS items are consistent with both unidimensional and multidimensional solutions. However, the bifactor model revealed that the overwhelming majority of common variance was due to a general factor. After controlling for the general factor, subscales provided little measurement precision. The bifactor model provides a valuable tool for exploring dimensionality related questions. In the Discussion, we describe contexts where a bifactor analysis is most productively used, and we contrast bifactor with multidimensional IRT models (MIRT). We also describe implications of bifactor models for IRT applications, and raise some limitations.

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Conceptualization
                Role: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Software
                Role: Funding acquisitionRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                5 December 2018
                2018
                : 13
                : 12
                : e0207706
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Psychology, University of Turku, Turku, Finland
                [2 ] Shandong University, Shandong, China
                Universiti Sains Malaysia, MALAYSIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-0047-202X
                Article
                PONE-D-18-15709
                10.1371/journal.pone.0207706
                6281236
                30517174
                05d60c62-9ce5-4d1b-94d3-ffda082f109d
                © 2018 Kumlander et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 25 May 2018
                : 4 November 2018
                Page count
                Figures: 6, Tables: 7, Pages: 22
                Funding
                Funded by: Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture
                Award ID: MEC/22/240/2013
                This study was supported by the Finnish Ministry of Education and Culture as part of "Wellbeing for secondary education" -project funding (MEC/22/240/2013). There was no additional external funding received for this study.
                Categories
                Research Article
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Age Groups
                Children
                Adolescents
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Families
                Children
                Adolescents
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Mental Health and Psychiatry
                Mood Disorders
                Depression
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Mathematical and Statistical Techniques
                Statistical Methods
                Factor Analysis
                Physical Sciences
                Mathematics
                Statistics
                Statistical Methods
                Factor Analysis
                Social Sciences
                Sociology
                Education
                Schools
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Emotions
                Research and Analysis Methods
                Research Assessment
                Research Validity
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Anatomy
                Nervous System
                Peripheral Nervous System
                Autonomic Nervous System
                Parasympathetic Nervous System
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Anatomy
                Nervous System
                Peripheral Nervous System
                Autonomic Nervous System
                Parasympathetic Nervous System
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper and its Supporting Information files.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log