Bunyamin Yavuz a , Umit Duman b , Gulcan Abali a , Omer Faruk Dogan b , Alkin Yazicioglu b , Levent Sahiner a , Kudret Aytemir a , Lale Tokgozoglu a , Metin Demircin b , Nasih Nazli a , Giray Kabakci a , Ali Oto a
03 July 2006
Coronary artery bypass grafting, QT dynamicity, Heart rate variability, Holter monitoring, Autonomic nervous activity
Background: Imbalance in autonomic nervous system and impaired myocardial repolarization has been shown to increase the risk for arrhythmias in patients with coronary artery disease. This study evaluated the effects of coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG) on heart rate variability and QT interval dynamicity in subjects with coronary artery disease undergoing elective CABG surgery. Methods: The study group consisted of 68 consecutive patients (mean age ±SD: 61 ± 9 years) with coronary artery disease who underwent elective CABG. Twenty-four-hour Holter monitoring was performed 2–5 days before cardiac surgery and was repeated 10 days after CABG. ELATEC holter software was used to calculate heart rate variability and QT dynamicity parameters. All subjects had a complete history, laboratory examination and transthoracic echocardiography. Results: All patients had beta-blocking agent medication pre- and postoperatively. Standard deviation of all NN intervals for a selected time period, square root of the mean of the sum of the squares of differences between adjacent RR intervals, the proportion of differences in successive NN intervals greater than 50 ms, normalized low-frequency power, and normalized high-frequency power were significantly decreased after CABG surgery, whereas low-frequency/high-frequency ratio was significantly increased after CABG. QT/RR slopes over 24 h were significantly increased after CABG surgery for QT end and QT apex (QTapex/RR: 0.16 ± 0.13 vs. 0.28 ± 0.19, p < 0.001; QTend/RR: 0.18 ± 0.13 vs. 0.36 ± 0.23, p < 0.001). Conclusion: This prospective study showed for the first time that CABG was associated with a significant worsening of heart rate variability and QT dynamicity parameters in the postoperative period.
Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.