49
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Hospitalization of high and low inpatient service users before and after enrollment into Assertive Community Treatment teams: a naturalistic observational study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Assertive Community Treatment (ACT) is more successful in reducing hospitalization when baseline use is high. However, with a growing recovery-focus, ACT may be useful for people with severe mental illness who are difficult to engage but not high users of inpatient services. This study investigated hospitalization 2 years before and 2 years after ACT enrollment amongst patients both with and without high inpatient services use before enrollment into ACT.

          Methods

          This naturalistic observational study included 142 patients from 12 different ACT teams throughout Norway. Of these, 74 (52 %) were high users of inpatient services before ACT. The teams assessed the patients upon enrollment using clinician-rated and self-reported questionnaires. Hospitalization data from 2 years before and 2 years after enrollment into ACT were obtained from the Norwegian Patient Registry. Linear mixed models were used to assess changes in hospitalization and to explore associations between these changes and patient characteristics.

          Results

          When the participants enrolled into the ACT teams, high users of inpatient care were younger, more often living alone and more often subject to involuntary outpatient treatment than low users. The participants spent significantly fewer days in hospital during the 2 years of ACT follow-up compared to the 2 years before enrollment. The reduction was more evident amongst high users, whereas low users had an initial increase in inpatient days in the first year of ACT and a subsequent decrease in the second year. More severe negative symptoms and previous high use of inpatient care were associated with a reduction in both total and involuntary inpatient days. Additionally, a reduction in involuntary inpatient days was associated with being subject to involuntary outpatient treatment upon enrollment into ACT.

          Conclusion

          The findings in this study may suggest that ACT contributes to more appropriate use of inpatient care, possibly by reducing the presumably avoidable hospitalization of high users and increasing the presumably needed inpatient care of low users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references37

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A new look at the statistical model identification

          IEEE Transactions on Automatic Control, 19(6), 716-723
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Evaluation of the Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) in criminal justice and detoxification settings and in a Swedish population sample.

            Psychometric properties of the 11-item self-report Drug Use Disorders Identification Test (DUDIT) were evaluated in a sample of heavy drug users from prison, probation, and inpatient detoxification settings, and in a general Swedish population sample. In the drug user sample, the DUDIT predicted drug dependence with a sensitivity of 90% for both DSM-4 and ICD-10 and a respective specificity of 78 and 88%. Reliability according to Cronbach's alpha coefficient was 0.80. In the population sample, 3.1% scored positive on the DUDIT; T-score values are suggested. The DUDIT screens effectively for drug-related problems in clinically selected groups and may prove useful in the context of public health surveys. Copyright (c) 2005 S. Karger AG, Basel.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Revising axis V for DSM-IV: a review of measures of social functioning.

              Axis V, which uses the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale in the multiaxial system of DSM-III-R, is under review for DSM-IV. This article examines what is known about axis V and selectively reviews the literature on measures of social functioning to identify potential alternatives to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. About 25 studies on the use, reliability, and validity of axis V in DSM-III and DSM-III-R are reviewed. In addition, nearly 30 measures of social functioning are reviewed and analyzed as potential substitutes for the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale. The analysis focuses on the strengths and weaknesses of each measure for assessing functioning on axis V. Axis V measures are modestly reliable and valid but not widely used. The authors identify and discuss two particular limitations of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale: 1) the combination of measures of symptoms and measures of social functioning on a single axis and 2) the exclusion of physical impairments from the rating of functioning. None of the measures of social functioning reviewed is clearly superior to the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale for use on axis V. A modified version of the Global Assessment of Functioning Scale, separating the measures of social and occupational functioning from the measures of symptoms and psychological functioning, is proposed for field testing, along with a new set of instructions permitting the rating of limitations due to both physical and mental impairments.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                hanne.kristin.clausen@ahus.no
                anne.landheim@sykehuset-innlandet.no
                sigrun.karin.odden@innlandet-sykehus.no
                jurate.saltyte-benth@medisin.uio.no
                kristin.s.heiervang@ahus.no
                hanne.kilen.stuen@sykehuset-innlandet.no
                h.killaspy@ucl.ac.uk
                torleif.ruud@ahus.no
                Journal
                Int J Ment Health Syst
                Int J Ment Health Syst
                International Journal of Mental Health Systems
                BioMed Central (London )
                1752-4458
                29 February 2016
                29 February 2016
                2016
                : 10
                : 14
                Affiliations
                [ ]Department of Research and Development, Mental Health Services, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
                [ ]Institute of Clinical Medicine, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
                [ ]National Centre for Dual Diagnosis, Innlandet Hospital Trust, Brumunddal, Norway
                [ ]Addiction Research, University of Oslo, Oslo, Norway
                [ ]HØKH Research Centre, Akershus University Hospital, Lørenskog, Norway
                [ ]Division of Psychiatry, University College London, London, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3282-6918
                Article
                52
                10.1186/s13033-016-0052-z
                4772328
                26933446
                0610f624-e3ed-40d1-9093-fd75bc1afbed
                © Clausen et al. 2016

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 24 August 2015
                : 24 February 2016
                Categories
                Research
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2016

                Neurology
                assertive community treatment,hospitalization,high inpatient service use,appropriate services

                Comments

                Comment on this article