14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Sex, gender, and irritable bowel syndrome: making the connections

      Gender Medicine
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a widespread chronic health condition experienced more often by women than by men. The extent to which women outnumber men varies, however, with a narrower sex ratio found in population surveys and the widest in gastroenterology clinics. This suggests that explanations of women's excess risk of this condition likely involve both sex, or biological, differences between men and women as well as gender, or social, differences. This article reviews research on sex and gender factors in IBS and, in particular, the ways in which these factors affect the risk of IBS, either independently or in synergy. A multidisciplinary literature review of English-language IBS research published between 1966 and 2002 was conducted using a number of electronic databases (ASSIA, MEDLINE, PsycLIT, and SSCI/Web of Knowledge), augmented by manual search of issues not yet entered onto the databases. The key terms sex, gender, women, men, and irritable bowel disease were used to identify articles with potential relevance; titles and abstracts were reviewed and downloaded to a bibliographic referencing system. This approach yielded approximately 450 articles of interest in the subject area. The literature review highlighted a range of sex- and gender-linked factors in IBS, including hormonal factors, genetic differences, psychosocial factors related to stress, mental well-being, gender roles, and the experience of sexual abuse. In addition, the literature suggests that gender-related factors overlap each other in explanations of IBS among women, and the interactions between these factors and sex-linked biology are not yet fully understood. A complex model is needed-reflecting sex- and gender-linked factors and their interactions-to fully understand how these factors affect variations in risk and outcome between men and women with IBS.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          U. S. Householder survey of functional gastrointestinal disorders

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Towards positive diagnosis of the irritable bowel.

            A questionnaire to establish the presence of 15 symptoms thought to be typical of the irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) was given to 109 unselected patients referred to gastroenterology or surgery clinics with abdominal pain or a change in bowel habit or both. Review of case records 17--26 months later established a definite diagnosis of IBS in 32 patients and of organic disease in 33. Four symptoms were significantly more common among patients with IBS--namely, distension, relief of pain with bowel movement, and looser and more frequent bowel movements with the onset of pain. Mucus and a sensation of incomplete evacuation were also common in these patients. The more of these symptoms that were present the more likely was it that the patient's pain or altered bowel habit, or both, was due to IBS. We conclude that a careful history can increase diagnostic confidence and reduce the amount of investigation in many patients with chronic abdominal pain.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Genders, sexes, and health: what are the connections--and why does it matter?

              Open up any biomedical or public health journal prior to the 1970s, and one term will be glaringly absent: gender. Open up any recent biomedical or public health journal, and two terms will be used either: (1) interchangeably, or (2) as distinct constructs: gender and sex. Why the change? Why the confusion?-and why does it matter? After briefly reviewing conceptual debates leading to distinctions between 'sex' and 'gender' as biological and social constructs, respectively, the paper draws on ecosocial theory to present 12 case examples in which gender relations and sex-linked biology are singly, neither, or both relevant as independent or synergistic determinants of the selected outcomes. Spanning from birth defects to mortality, these outcomes include: chromosomal disorders, infectious and non-infectious disease, occupational and environmental disease, trauma, pregnancy, menopause, and access to health services. As these examples highlight, not only can gender relations influence expression-and interpretation-of biological traits, but also sex-linked biological characteristics can, in some cases, contribute to or amplify gender differentials in health. Because our science will only be as clear and error-free as our thinking, greater precision about whether and when gender relations, sex-linked biology, both, or neither matter for health is warranted.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gender Medicine
                Gender Medicine
                Elsevier BV
                15508579
                August 2004
                August 2004
                : 1
                : 1
                : 18-28
                Article
                10.1016/S1550-8579(04)80007-X
                16115580
                06291217-3ee9-415d-8feb-ffd274122bd7
                © 2004

                https://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article