1
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      Impact of Afirma gene expression classifier on cytopathology diagnosis and rate of thyroidectomy : Afirma Impact on Thyroid FNA and Surgery

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisher
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          An independent study of a gene expression classifier (Afirma) in the evaluation of cytologically indeterminate thyroid nodules.

          Molecular markers hold the promise of improved diagnostic yield in thyroid fine-needle biopsy. The Afirma gene expression classifier (GEC), available commercially, reports a negative predictive value of 94% in the diagnosis of benign nodules after indeterminate cytology. However, there are currently no independent studies of the performance of this assay.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Molecular classification of thyroid nodules using high-dimensionality genomic data.

            We set out to develop a molecular test that distinguishes benign and malignant thyroid nodules using fine-needle aspirates (FNA). We used mRNA expression analysis to measure more than 247,186 transcripts in 315 thyroid nodules, comprising multiple subtypes. The data set consisted of 178 retrospective surgical tissues and 137 prospectively collected FNA samples. Two classifiers were trained separately on surgical tissues and FNAs. The performance was evaluated using an independent set of 48 prospective FNA samples, which included 50% with indeterminate cytopathology. Performance of the tissue-trained classifier was markedly lower in FNAs than in tissue. Exploratory analysis pointed to differences in cellular heterogeneity between tissues and FNAs as the likely cause. The classifier trained on FNA samples resulted in increased performance, estimated using both 30-fold cross-validation and an independent test set. On the test set, negative predictive value and specificity were estimated to be 96 and 84%, respectively, suggesting clinical utility in the management of patients considering surgery. Using in silico and in vitro mixing experiments, we demonstrated that even in the presence of 80% dilution with benign background, the classifier can correctly recognize malignancy in the majority of FNA samples. The FNA-trained classifier was able to classify an independent set of FNAs in which substantial RNA degradation had occurred and in the presence of blood. High tolerance to dilution makes the classifier useful in routine clinical settings where sampling error may be a concern. An ongoing multicenter clinical trial will allow us to validate molecular test performance on a larger independent test set of prospectively collected thyroid FNAs.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Surgical utility of Afirma: effects of high cancer prevalence and oncocytic cell types in patients with indeterminate thyroid cytology.

              The Afirma Gene Expression Classifier (GEC) molecular marker assay was developed for the purpose of improving surgical decision-making with indeterminate fine-needle aspiration (FNA) biopsies of thyroid nodules. In this paper, we analyze the performance of the GEC over 27 months in a community hospital-based thyroid surgery practice.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancer Cytopathology
                Cancer Cytopathology
                Wiley
                1934662X
                October 2016
                October 2016
                June 27 2016
                : 124
                : 10
                : 722-728
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Endocrinology, Department of Medicine; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
                [2 ]Department of Pathology; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
                [3 ]Department of Radiation Oncology; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
                [4 ]Department of Surgery; Cedars-Sinai Medical Center; Los Angeles California
                Article
                10.1002/cncy.21749
                066ea3b0-4cdd-4516-9e02-a0c6587b68fe
                © 2016

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article