12
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Exercise and cancer-related fatigue in adults: a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analyses

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      BMC Cancer
      BioMed Central
      Exercise, Cancer, Fatigue, Meta-analysis, Systematic review

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Conduct a systematic review of previous systematic reviews with meta-analysis to determine the effects of exercise (aerobic, strength or both) on cancer-related-fatigue (CRF) in adults with any type of cancer.

          Methods

          Systematic reviews with meta-analyses of previous randomized controlled trials published through July of 2016 were included by searching six electronic databases and cross-referencing. Dual-selection and data abstraction were conducted. Methodological quality was assessed using the Assessment of Multiple Systematic Reviews (AMSTAR) instrument. Standardized mean differences (SMD) that were pooled using random-effects models were included as the effect size. In addition, 95% prediction intervals (PI), number needed-to-treat (NNT) and percentile improvements were calculated.

          Results

          Sixteen studies representing 2 to 48 SMD effect sizes per analysis (mean ± SD, 7 ± 8, median = 5) and 37 to 3254 participants (mean ± SD, 633 ± 690, median = 400) were included. Length of training lasted from 3 to 52 weeks (mean ± SD, 14.6 ± 3.1, median = 14), frequency from 1 to 10 times per week (mean ± SD, 3.4 ± 0.8, median = 3), and duration from 10 to 120 min per session (mean ± SD, 44.3 ± 5.5, median = 45). Adjusted AMSTAR scores ranged from 44.4% to 80.0% (mean ± SD, 68.8% ± 12.0%, median = 72.5%). Overall, mean SMD improvements in CRF ranged from −1.05 to −0.01, with 22 of 55 meta-analytic results (52.7%) statistically significant (non-overlapping 95% CI). When PI were calculated for results with non-overlapping 95% CI, only 3 of 25 (12%) yielded non-overlapping 95% PI favoring reductions in CRF. Number needed-to-treat and percentile improvements ranged from 3 to 16 and 4.4 to 26.4, respectively.

          Conclusions

          A lack of certainty exists regarding the benefits of exercise on CRF in adults. However, exercise does not appear to increase CRF in adults.

          Trial registration

          PROSPERO Registration # CRD42016045405.

          Electronic supplementary material

          The online version of this article (10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

          Related collections

          Most cited references90

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Bias in meta-analysis detected by a simple, graphical test

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Meta-analysis in clinical trials

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                304-293-6279 , gkelley@hsc.wvu.edu
                304-293-6280 , kskelley@hsc.wvu.edu
                Journal
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BMC Cancer
                BioMed Central (London )
                1471-2407
                23 October 2017
                23 October 2017
                2017
                : 17
                : 693
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Meta-Analytic Research Group, School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, Director, WVCTSI Clinical Research Design, Epidemiology, and Biostatistics (CRDEB) Program, PO Box 9190, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, Room 2350-A, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9190 USA
                [2 ]Meta-Analytic Research Group, School of Public Health, Department of Biostatistics, PO Box 9190, Robert C. Byrd Health Sciences Center, Room 2350-B, Morgantown, West Virginia 26506-9190 USA
                Article
                3687
                10.1186/s12885-017-3687-5
                5651567
                29058631
                067d3833-64ad-4a96-a5b8-b092e7241435
                © The Author(s). 2017

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated.

                History
                : 12 April 2017
                : 12 October 2017
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000057, National Institute of General Medical Sciences;
                Award ID: U54GM104942
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2017

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                exercise,cancer,fatigue,meta-analysis,systematic review
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                exercise, cancer, fatigue, meta-analysis, systematic review

                Comments

                Comment on this article