2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      A quick and easy delirium assessment for nonphysician research personnel

      , , , , ,
      The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
      Elsevier BV

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          <div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S1"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d792494e212">Objectives</h5> <p id="P1">Delirium in the emergency department (ED) is an emerging field of research. Most ED research infrastructures utilize lay personnel to collect data, but delirium assessments that can be reliably performed by non-physicians are lacking. We evaluated the diagnostic performance of the modified Brief Confusion Assessment Method (modified bCAM) for this purpose. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S2"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d792494e217">Methods</h5> <p id="P2">This was a secondary analysis of a prospective observational study than enrolled ED patients 65 years or older. The original bCAM was a brief (&lt; 2 minutes) delirium assessment that assessed for inattention by asking the patient to recite the months backwards from December to July. It was modified by adding the Vigilance A (“squeeze my hand when you hear the letter ‘A’”) to the inattention assessment. The elements of the modified bCAM were performed by a research assistant (RA) and emergency physician. The reference standard for delirium was a psychiatrist assessment performed within 3 hours using Diagnostic and Statistical Manual of Mental Disorder, Fourth Edition, Text Revision (DSM-IV-TR) criteria. All assessors were blinded to each other. Sensitivities and specificities with their 95% confidence intervals (95%CI) were calculated for the RA and emergency physician. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S3"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d792494e222">Results</h5> <p id="P3">Of the 406 patients enrolled, 50 (12%) were delirious. The modified bCAM was 82.0% (95%CI: 71.4% – 92.6%) sensitive and 96.1% (95%CI: 94.0% – 98.1%) specific when performed by the RA. The emergency physician’s modified bCAM exhibited similar diagnostic performance. </p> </div><div class="section"> <a class="named-anchor" id="S4"> <!-- named anchor --> </a> <h5 class="section-title" id="d792494e227">Conclusions</h5> <p id="P4">The modified bCAM may be a feasible, accurate, and reliable method for non-physicians to assess for delirium. Future studies are needed to confirm these findings. </p> </div>

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
          The American Journal of Emergency Medicine
          Elsevier BV
          07356757
          June 2016
          June 2016
          : 34
          : 6
          : 1031-1036
          Article
          10.1016/j.ajem.2016.02.069
          4899095
          27021131
          069e18c4-7b4b-4cc7-b2ba-0f57adbee541
          © 2016

          http://www.elsevier.com/tdm/userlicense/1.0/

          History

          Comments

          Comment on this article