129
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    5
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Regulated Fluctuations in Nanog Expression Mediate Cell Fate Decisions in Embryonic Stem Cells

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The notion that the differentiated state of a cell population is determined simply by expression of specific marker genes is changing. In this work, the authors reveal that a pluripotent cell population comprises cells with temporal fluctuations in the expression of Nanog.

          Abstract

          There is evidence that pluripotency of mouse embryonic stem (ES) cells is associated with the activity of a network of transcription factors with Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog at the core. Using fluorescent reporters for the expression of Nanog, we observed that a population of ES cells is best described by a dynamic distribution of Nanog expression characterized by two peaks defined by high (HN) and low (LN) Nanog expression. Typically, the LN state is 5%–20% of the total population, depending on the culture conditions. Modelling of the activity of Nanog reveals that a simple network of Oct4/Sox2 and Nanog activity can account for the observed distribution and its properties as long as the transcriptional activity is tuned by transcriptional noise. The model also predicts that the LN state is unstable, something that is born out experimentally. While in this state, cells can differentiate. We suggest that transcriptional fluctuations in Nanog expression are an essential element of the pluripotent state and that the function of Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog is to act as a network that promotes and maintains transcriptional noise to interfere with the differentiation signals.

          Author Summary

          Embryonic stem (ES) cells are a pluripotent cell population derived from early mammalian embryos. An intrinsic feature of ES cells is their phenotypic heterogeneity: they display promiscuous activation of lineage-specific genes and exhibit a fluctuating flow of differentiating cells. A gene regulatory network (GRN) centred around the transcription factors Sox2, Oct4, and Nanog is essential for the establishment and the maintenance of the pluripotent state. Previous studies had suggested that ES cells can reversibly change their state of Nanog expression without losing pluripotency. Here, we extend these studies by quantifying and monitoring the expression of Nanog in a Nanog-GFP reporter cell line. We show that Nanog levels undergo slow, random fluctuations in ES cells, giving rise to heterogeneous cell populations. We identify two states, one stable, characterized by high levels of expression (HN), and another with low levels of Nanog expression (LN), which is highly unstable. While in the LN state, cells are more likely to differentiate depending on the culture medium. Mathematical modelling shows that a simple excitable system driven by transcriptional noise can account for the observed distributions and behaviours in gene expression. Our study suggests that rather than a discrete state dependent on the fixed expression of a small set of genes, pluripotency is best represented by a state of dynamic heterogeneity of a population driven by transcriptional noise, and that the function of the gene regulatory network centred around Nanog might be to generate dynamic heterogeneities at the population level.

          Related collections

          Most cited references64

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Isolation of a pluripotent cell line from early mouse embryos cultured in medium conditioned by teratocarcinoma stem cells.

          G Martin (1981)
          This report describes the establishment directly from normal preimplantation mouse embryos of a cell line that forms teratocarcinomas when injected into mice. The pluripotency of these embryonic stem cells was demonstrated conclusively by the observation that subclonal cultures, derived from isolated single cells, can differentiate into a wide variety of cell types. Such embryonic stem cells were isolated from inner cell masses of late blastocysts cultured in medium conditioned by an established teratocarcinoma stem cell line. This suggests that such conditioned medium might contain a growth factor that stimulates the proliferation or inhibits the differentiation of normal pluripotent embryonic cells, or both. This method of obtaining embryonic stem cells makes feasible the isolation of pluripotent cells lines from various types of noninbred embryo, including those carrying mutant genes. The availability of such cell lines should made possible new approaches to the study of early mammalian development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Stochasticity in gene expression: from theories to phenotypes.

            Genetically identical cells exposed to the same environmental conditions can show significant variation in molecular content and marked differences in phenotypic characteristics. This variability is linked to stochasticity in gene expression, which is generally viewed as having detrimental effects on cellular function with potential implications for disease. However, stochasticity in gene expression can also be advantageous. It can provide the flexibility needed by cells to adapt to fluctuating environments or respond to sudden stresses, and a mechanism by which population heterogeneity can be established during cellular differentiation and development.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Establishment in culture of pluripotential cells from mouse embryos.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: Academic Editor
                Journal
                PLoS Biol
                plos
                plosbiol
                PLoS Biology
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, USA )
                1544-9173
                1545-7885
                July 2009
                July 2009
                7 July 2009
                : 7
                : 7
                : e1000149
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Genetics, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [2 ]Wellcome Trust Centre for Stem Cell Research, University of Cambridge, Cambridge, United Kingdom
                [3 ]Departament de Fisica i Enginyeria Nuclear, Universitat Politecnica de Catalunya, Colom 11, Terrassa, Spain
                Baylor College of Medicine, United States of America
                Author notes

                The author(s) have made the following declarations about their contributions: Conceived and designed the experiments: TK CL PH AMA. Performed the experiments: TK CL PH SM-D JN. Analyzed the data: TK CL PH JN JG-O AMA. Contributed reagents/materials/analysis tools: TK. Wrote the paper: TK JG-O AMA. Developed the model: JG-O AMA.

                Article
                08-PLBI-RA-3585R4
                10.1371/journal.pbio.1000149
                2700273
                19582141
                06a67d17-d8f4-4e69-ace1-bd875ed6c21b
                Kalmar et al. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.
                History
                : 22 August 2008
                : 28 May 2009
                Page count
                Pages: 16
                Categories
                Research Article
                Cell Biology
                Computational Biology/Molecular Dynamics
                Developmental Biology/Cell Differentiation

                Life sciences
                Life sciences

                Comments

                Comment on this article