Anesthetic Efficacy of Supplemental Buccal and Lingual Infiltrations of Articaine and Lidocaine after an Inferior Alveolar Nerve Block in Patients with Irreversible Pulpitis
There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.
Abstract
The success rate of inferior alveolar nerve block (IANB) decreases in patients with
irreversible pulpitis. It was hypothesized that supplemental infiltration of lidocaine
and articaine may improve the success rates.
Eighty-four adult volunteers, actively experiencing pain, participated in this prospective,
randomized, double-blinded study. All patients received standard IANB of 2% lidocaine
with 1:200,000 epinephrine. Twenty-four patients did not receive supplemental infiltrations
(control). Thirty patients received supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations
of 2% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine, and 30 patients received buccal and lingual
infiltrations of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine at 2 minutes after the IANB.
Endodontic access preparation was initiated after 15 minutes of initial IANB. Pain
during treatment was recorded by using a Heft Parker visual analog scale. Success
was recorded as "none" or "mild" pain.
Statistical analysis using nonparametric McNemer tests showed that supplemental buccal
and lingual infiltration of 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine or 4% articaine
with 1:200,000 epinephrine improved the success rate from 33% to 47% and 67%, respectively.
Also the success rate with 4% articaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine was significantly
more than 2% lidocaine with 1:200,000 epinephrine (p < 0.05).
Although supplemental buccal and lingual infiltrations of 4% articaine or 2% lidocaine
increased the success rate of the inferior alveolar nerve block in patients with irreversible
pulpitis, none of the techniques provided acceptable success rates.