+1 Recommend
1 collections
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Analysis by Plaque Assays of GH and Prolactin Release from Individual Cells in Cultures of Male Pituitaries

      Read this article at

          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.


          In this study we evaluated the quantitative influence of GRF and TRH on the rate of hormone secretion from single cells in cultures of male pituitaries. To accomplish this, we dispersed pituitaries from male rats with trypsin and cultured them for 24 or 48 h. Reverse hemolytic plaque assays for GH and prolactin were then performed on retrypsinized cultures to identify individual cells that secreted these hormones. Mammotropes and somatotropes were found to comprise 31.4 ± 1.8 and 32.2 ± 0.9% (mean ± SE, n = 3 experiments), respectively, of all cells in 24-hour cultures. Immunocytochemical staining of different batches of cells from the same dispersions corroborated the proportions of these two cell types. Differences in the rate of basal hormone secretion were observed within each of these cell populations as evidenced by the gradual appearance of prolactin and GH plaques over a 4-hour period when incubations were conducted in the absence of stimulatory secretagogues. Addition of increasing concentrations of GRF (1 × 10<sup>–10</sup>–1 × 10<sup>–7</sup> M) orTRH (1 × 10<sup>–9</sup>–1 × 10<sup>–6</sup> M) to these incubations resulted in dose-related increases in the rate of GH and prolactin plaque formation, respectively. Maximal plaque development by somatotropes could be induced within 30 min of administering large doses of GRF, indicating that most, if not all somatotropes are responsive to this secretagogue. In contrast, approximately one third of all mammotropes could not be stimulated to form plaques acutely when subjected to similar treatment with TRH. This observation suggests that mammotropes are heterogeneous with respect to TRH responsiveness. Finally, treatment with these secretagogues did not increase over the control value the percentage of all cultured cells that formed plaques, demonstrating that the hypothalamic factors tested did not recruit additional cells into the secretory pool. These results provide evidence to indicate that: (1) mammotropes may account for a greater proportion of pituitary cells in males than previously believed; (2) mammotrope and somatotrope populations in male rats are each heterogeneous with respect to basal hormone secretion, and that mammotropes differ in responsiveness to TRH, and (3) the rate of plaque formation provides a reliable index of the rate of hormone secretion. Thus, the reverse hemolytic plaque assay provides a semiquantitative tool for studying hormone release by individual pituitary cells in culture.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          S. Karger AG
          28 March 2008
          : 42
          : 1
          : 64-70
          Department of Zoology, Iowa State University, Ames, Iowa, USA
          124250 Neuroendocrinology 1986;42:64–70
          © 1986 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 7
          Original Paper


          Comment on this article