18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effects of repeated transcranial direct current stimulation on smoking, craving and brain reactivity to smoking cues

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Recent studies have shown that transcranial direct current stimulation (tDCS) may reduce craving and smoking. However, little is known regarding brain correlates of these behavioral changes. We aimed to evaluate whether 10 sessions of tDCS modulate cigarette consumption, craving and brain reactivity to smoking cues in subjects with tobacco use disorder (TUD). In a double blind parallel-arms study, 29 subjects with TUD who wished to quit smoking were randomly assigned to receive 10 sessions of either active or sham tDCS applied with the anode over the right dorsolateral prefrontal cortex (DLPFC) and a large cathode over the left occipital region. As compared to sham, active tDCS significantly reduced smoking craving and increased brain reactivity to smoking-cues within the right posterior cingulate, as measured with a functional magnetic resonance imaging event-related paradigm. However, we failed to find a significant difference between active and sham groups regarding the self-reported number of cigarettes smoked and the exhaled carbon monoxide during one month. These findings suggested that 10 sessions of tDCS over the right DLPFC may reduce craving by modulating activity within the resisting-to-smoke network but might not be significantly more effective than sham to decrease cigarette consumption.

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Distinct prefrontal cortex activity associated with item memory and source memory for visual shapes.

          In contrast to item memory, which refers to recognition or recall of previously presented information, source memory refers to memory for the context of previously presented information. The relatively few functional MRI (fMRI) source memory studies conducted to date have provided evidence that item memory and source memory are associated with differential activity in right and left prefrontal cortex, respectively. To both confirm this distinction in prefrontal cortex and to determine whether other differences in the neural substrates associated with these cognitive functions exist, an event-related fMRI study was conducted. In this study, item memory and source memory encoding phases were identical; participants viewed a series of abstract visual shapes presented on the left or right side of the screen and were instructed to remember each shape and its spatial location. During the item memory retrieval phase, shapes from the encoding phase were intermixed with new shapes and participants made an old-new judgment. During the source memory retrieval phase, all shapes were from the encoding phase and participants made a left-right judgment. An event-related analysis of item memory and source memory revealed a right and left prefrontal cortex distinction. Moreover, only item memory was associated with activity in the medial temporal lobes. These results confirm and extend previous findings that item memory and source memory are associated with distinct neural substrates.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            Common biology of craving across legal and illegal drugs - a quantitative meta-analysis of cue-reactivity brain response : Common biology of craving across legal and illegal drugs

            The present quantitative meta-analysis set out to test whether cue-reactivity responses in humans differ across drugs of abuse and whether these responses constitute the biological basis of drug craving as a core psychopathology of addiction. By means of activation likelihood estimation, we investigated the concurrence of brain regions activated by cue-induced craving paradigms across studies on nicotine, alcohol and cocaine addicts. Furthermore, we analysed the concurrence of brain regions positively correlated with self-reported craving in nicotine and alcohol studies. We found direct overlap between nicotine, alcohol and cocaine cue reactivity in the ventral striatum. In addition, regions of close proximity were observed in the anterior cingulate cortex (ACC; nicotine and cocaine) and amygdala (alcohol, nicotine and cocaine). Brain regions of concurrence in drug cue-reactivity paradigms that overlapped with brain regions of concurrence in self-reported craving correlations were found in the ACC, ventral striatum and right pallidum (for alcohol). This first quantitative meta-analysis on drug cue reactivity identifies brain regions underlying nicotine, alcohol and cocaine dependency, i.e. the ventral striatum. The ACC, right pallidum and ventral striatum were related to drug cue reactivity as well as self-reported craving, suggesting that this set of brain regions constitutes the core circuit of drug craving in nicotine and alcohol addiction. © 2011 The Authors. European Journal of Neuroscience © 2011 Federation of European Neuroscience Societies and Blackwell Publishing Ltd.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neural substrates of smoking cue reactivity: a meta-analysis of fMRI studies.

              Reactivity to smoking-related cues may be an important factor that precipitates relapse in smokers who are trying to quit. The neurobiology of smoking cue reactivity has been investigated in several fMRI studies. We combined the results of these studies using activation likelihood estimation, a meta-analytic technique for fMRI data. Results of the meta-analysis indicated that smoking cues reliably evoke larger fMRI responses than neutral cues in the extended visual system, precuneus, posterior cingulate gyrus, anterior cingulate gyrus, dorsal and medial prefrontal cortex, insula, and dorsal striatum. Subtraction meta-analyses revealed that parts of the extended visual system and dorsal prefrontal cortex are more reliably responsive to smoking cues in deprived smokers than in non-deprived smokers, and that short-duration cues presented in event-related designs produce larger responses in the extended visual system than long-duration cues presented in blocked designs. The areas that were found to be responsive to smoking cues agree with theories of the neurobiology of cue reactivity, with two exceptions. First, there was a reliable cue reactivity effect in the precuneus, which is not typically considered a brain region important to addiction. Second, we found no significant effect in the nucleus accumbens, an area that plays a critical role in addiction, but this effect may have been due to technical difficulties associated with measuring fMRI data in that region. The results of this meta-analysis suggest that the extended visual system should receive more attention in future studies of smoking cue reactivity. Copyright © 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                marine.mondino@ch-le-vinatier.fr
                Journal
                Sci Rep
                Sci Rep
                Scientific Reports
                Nature Publishing Group UK (London )
                2045-2322
                7 June 2018
                7 June 2018
                2018
                : 8
                : 8724
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2112 9282, GRID grid.4444.0, INSERM, U1028; CNRS, UMR5292; Lyon Neuroscience Research Center, Psychiatric Disorders: from Resistance to Response Team, ; Lyon, F-69000 France
                [2 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2150 7757, GRID grid.7849.2, University Lyon 1, ; Villeurbanne, F-69000 France
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0000 9479 661X, GRID grid.420146.5, Centre Hospitalier Le Vinatier, ; Bron, France
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2292 3357, GRID grid.14848.31, Department of psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, , Université de Montréal, ; Montreal, Canada
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2321 7657, GRID grid.414210.2, Centre de recherche, Institut universitaire en santé mentale de Montréal, ; Montreal, Canada
                [6 ]URC, Pole G03, EPS Ville Evrard, 93300 Neuilly Sur Marne, France
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-3175-8503
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5479-5628
                Article
                27057
                10.1038/s41598-018-27057-1
                5992174
                29880873
                070e5dec-8591-49cc-a082-d2c4f3f8e04b
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article’s Creative Commons license, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article’s Creative Commons license and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this license, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.

                History
                : 9 February 2018
                : 25 May 2018
                Categories
                Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article