32
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Factors Associated With Reduced Efficacy of Sitagliptin Therapy: Analysis of 93 Patients With Type 2 Diabetes Treated for 1.5 Years or Longer

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Several studies have shown the effectiveness of sitagliptin, a dipeptidyl peptidase-4 inhibitor, for type 2 diabetes, with a hypoglycemic effect being demonstrated both when it is administered alone or in combination with other oral antidiabetic agents. However, there are few reports about its long-term efficacy, although medications for diabetes need to be effective over the long term. This study (as part of ASSET-K) aimed to investigate the efficacy and safety of sitagliptin when it was administered for 1.5 years or longer, and to explore factors associated with reduction of the therapeutic response.

          Methods

          Out of 375 patients treated with sitagliptin (50 mg/day) at Kanamori Diabetes Clinic between December 2009 and March 2012, 133 could be followed up for 72 weeks without interruption. After excluding 40 patients in whom the dosage and/or types of concomitant medications were modified during that period, the remaining 93 were included in this analysis. Clinical indices, such as blood glucose, HbA1c, and body weight, were investigated retrospectively. Compliance with diet and exercise therapy at 48 weeks was checked by a questionnaire.

          Results

          In the 93 patients analyzed (sitagliptin monotherapy, n = 9; combination therapy, n = 77; and switching from an alpha-glucosidase inhibitor or glinide, n = 7), hemoglobin A1c (HbA1c) showed a significant decrease after 24 weeks (7.70 ± 0.73% at baseline vs. 6.90 ± 0.55% at 24 weeks), but then showed a slight increase at 48 weeks. HbA1c was subsequently maintained in the same range with no significant changes until 72 weeks. A positive correlation was noted between the changes of HbA1c and body weight from 24 to 48 weeks. Compliance with diet and exercise therapy was worse in patients showing a ≥ 0.3% increase of HbA1c (n = 37) from 24 to 48 weeks than in the others (n = 56). Multiple logistic regression analysis showed that both factors were independent determinants of the increase of HbA1c from 24 weeks onward.

          Conclusions

          Sitagliptin showed good efficacy and safety when administered for 18 months as both monotherapy and combination therapy. Inadequate compliance with diet/exercise therapy and weight again may be associated with an increase of HbA1c over time during treatment with sitagliptin.

          Related collections

          Most cited references22

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy and safety of incretin therapy in type 2 diabetes: systematic review and meta-analysis.

          Pharmacotherapies that augment the incretin pathway have recently become available, but their role in the management of type 2 diabetes is not well defined. To assess the efficacy and safety of incretin-based therapy in adults with type 2 diabetes based on randomized controlled trials published in peer-reviewed journals or as abstracts. We searched MEDLINE (1966-May 20, 2007) and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (second quarter, 2007) for English-language randomized controlled trials involving an incretin mimetic (glucagonlike peptide 1 [GLP-1] analogue) or enhancer (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 [DPP4] inhibitor). We also searched prescribing information, relevant Web sites, reference lists and citation sections of recovered articles, and abstracts presented at recent conferences. Randomized controlled trials were selected if they were at least 12 weeks in duration, compared incretin therapy with placebo or other diabetes medication, and reported hemoglobin A(1c) data in nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes. Two reviewers independently assessed trials for inclusion and extracted data. Differences were resolved by consensus. Meta-analyses were conducted for several efficacy and safety outcomes. Of 355 potentially relevant articles identified, 51 were retrieved for detailed evaluation and 29 met the inclusion criteria. Incretins lowered hemoglobin A(1c) compared with placebo (weighted mean difference, -0.97% [95% confidence interval {CI}, -1.13% to -0.81%] for GLP-1 analogues and -0.74% [95% CI, -0.85% to -0.62%] for DPP4 inhibitors) and were noninferior to other hypoglycemic agents. Glucagonlike peptide 1 analogues resulted in weight loss (1.4 kg and 4.8 kg vs placebo and insulin, respectively) while DPP4 inhibitors were weight neutral. Glucagonlike peptide 1 analogues had more gastrointestinal side effects (risk ratio, 2.9 [95% CI, 2.0-4.2] for nausea and 3.2 [95% CI, 2.5-4.4] for vomiting). Dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors had an increased risk of infection (risk ratio, 1.2 [95% CI, 1.0-1.4] for nasopharyngitis and 1.5 [95% CI, 1.0-2.2] for urinary tract infection) and headache (risk ratio, 1.4 [95% CI, 1.1-1.7]). All but 3 trials had a 30-week or shorter duration; thus, long-term efficacy and safety could not be evaluated. Incretin therapy offers an alternative option to currently available hypoglycemic agents for nonpregnant adults with type 2 diabetes, with modest efficacy and a favorable weight-change profile. Careful postmarketing surveillance for adverse effects, especially among the DPP4 inhibitors, and continued evaluation in longer-term studies and in clinical practice are required to determine the role of this new class among current pharmacotherapies for type 2 diabetes.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Incretin-based therapies for type 2 diabetes mellitus.

            Incretin-based drugs, such as glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists and dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors, are now routinely used to treat type 2 diabetes mellitus. These agents regulate glucose metabolism through multiple mechanisms, their use is associated with low rates of hypoglycemia, and they either do not affect body weight (dipeptidyl peptidase 4 inhibitors), or promote weight loss (glucagon-like peptide-1 receptor agonists). The success of exenatide and sitagliptin, the first therapies in their respective drug classes to be based on incretins, has fostered the development of multiple new agents that are currently in late stages of clinical development or awaiting approval. This Review highlights our current understanding of the mechanisms of action of incretin-based drugs, with an emphasis on the emerging clinical profile of new agents.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              GIP and GLP‐1, the two incretin hormones: Similarities and differences

              Abstract Gastric inhibitory polypeptide (GIP) and glucagon‐like peptide‐1 (GLP‐1) are the two primary incretin hormones secreted from the intestine on ingestion of glucose or nutrients to stimulate insulin secretion from pancreatic β cells. GIP and GLP‐1 exert their effects by binding to their specific receptors, the GIP receptor (GIPR) and the GLP‐1 receptor (GLP‐1R), which belong to the G‐protein coupled receptor family. Receptor binding activates and increases the level of intracellular cyclic adenosine monophosphate in pancreatic β cells, thereby stimulating insulin secretion glucose‐dependently. In addition to their insulinotropic effects, GIP and GLP‐1 play critical roles in various biological processes in different tissues and organs that express GIPR and GLP‐1R, including the pancreas, fat, bone and the brain. Within the pancreas, GIP and GLP‐1 together promote β cell proliferation and inhibit apoptosis, thereby expanding pancreatic β cell mass, while GIP enhances postprandial glucagon response and GLP‐1 suppresses it. In adipose tissues, GIP but not GLP‐1 facilitates fat deposition. In bone, GIP promotes bone formation while GLP‐1 inhibits bone absorption. In the brain, both GIP and GLP‐1 are thought to be involved in memory formation as well as the control of appetite. In addition to these differences, secretion of GIP and GLP‐1 and their insulinotropic effects on β cells have been shown to differ in patients with type 2 diabetes compared to healthy subjects. We summarize here the similarities and differences of these two incretin hormones in secretion and metabolism, their insulinotropic action on pancreatic β cells, and their non‐insulinotropic effects, and discuss their potential in treatment of type 2 diabetes. (J Diabetes Invest, doi: 10.1111/j.2040‐1124.2010.00022.x, 2010)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                J Clin Med Res
                J Clin Med Res
                Elmer Press
                Journal of Clinical Medicine Research
                Elmer Press
                1918-3003
                1918-3011
                June 2013
                23 April 2013
                : 5
                : 3
                : 217-221
                Affiliations
                [a ]Kanamori Diabetes Clinic, First floor, Prestige Sagami Yume Odori, 8-1-1 Sagamihara, Sagamihara City, Kanagawa 229-0031, Japan
                [b ]Matsuba Clinic, 2-159 Tsukagoshi, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa 212-0024, Japan
                Author notes
                [c ]Corresponding author: Ikuro Matsuba, Matsuba Clinic 2-159 Tsukagoshi, Saiwai-ku, Kawasaki City, Kanagawa 212-0024, Japan. Email: ikuro@ 123456matsuba-web.com
                Article
                10.4021/jocmr1256w
                3651072
                23671547
                0717d32d-f9d9-49e2-9e7c-22dc1c807f48
                Copyright 2013, Kanamori et al.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 19 February 2013
                Categories
                Original Article

                Medicine
                sitagliptin,type 2 diabetes,hemoglobin a1c,long-term administration
                Medicine
                sitagliptin, type 2 diabetes, hemoglobin a1c, long-term administration

                Comments

                Comment on this article