9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Reducing ageism toward older adults and highlighting older adults as contributors during the COVID‐19 pandemic

      research-article
      1 , , 2
      The Journal of Social Issues
      John Wiley and Sons Inc.

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The COVID‐19 pandemic exacerbated ageism (stereotyping, prejudice, and discrimination) toward older adults in the United States, highlighting the belief that older adults are a burden. Prior to the pandemic, a growing body of research sought to reduce ageism using the PEACE (Positive Education about Aging and Contact Experiences) model. Extending that research, participants were randomly assigned to watch three videos (less than 10 min total) that challenged stereotypes about aging and older adults, depicted positive intergenerational contact, and highlighted older adults as contributors to society (experimental condition) or three videos on wallpaper (control condition). Experimental participants (undergraduate students in Study 1 and a national community sample of young adults in Study 2) reported increased endorsement of older adults as contributors to society and positive stereotypes of older adults. In addition, in Study 2, negative stereotypes of older adults and views of intergenerational conflict were also reduced among experimental (vs. control) participants. These promising findings show that relatively brief ageism reduction interventions are effective during the pandemic and for the first time, that the perception of older adults as contributors to society can be increased. Future directions and implications for social policies are discussed.

          Related collections

          Most cited references92

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual older adults: results from a population-based study.

          We investigated health disparities among lesbian, gay, and bisexual (LGB) adults aged 50 years and older. We analyzed data from the 2003-2010 Washington State Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (n = 96 992) on health outcomes, chronic conditions, access to care, behaviors, and screening by gender and sexual orientation with adjusted logistic regressions. LGB older adults had higher risk of disability, poor mental health, smoking, and excessive drinking than did heterosexuals. Lesbians and bisexual women had higher risk of cardiovascular disease and obesity, and gay and bisexual men had higher risk of poor physical health and living alone than did heterosexuals. Lesbians reported a higher rate of excessive drinking than did bisexual women; bisexual men reported a higher rate of diabetes and a lower rate of being tested for HIV than did gay men. Conclusions. Tailored interventions are needed to address the health disparities and unique health needs of LGB older adults. Research across the life course is needed to better understand health disparities by sexual orientation and age, and to assess subgroup differences within these communities.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Aging in Times of the COVID-19 Pandemic: Avoiding Ageism and Fostering Intergenerational Solidarity

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Global reach of ageism on older persons’ health: A systematic review

              Objective Although there is anecdotal evidence of ageism occurring at both the structural level (in which societal institutions reinforce systematic bias against older persons) and individual level (in which older persons take in the negative views of aging of their culture), previous systematic reviews have not examined how both levels simultaneously influence health. Thus, the impact of ageism may be underestimated. We hypothesized that a comprehensive systematic review would reveal that these ageism levels adversely impact the health of older persons across geography, health outcomes, and time. Method A literature search was performed using 14 databases with no restrictions on region, language, and publication type. The systematic search yielded 13,691 papers for screening, 638 for full review, and 422 studies for analyses. Sensitivity analyses that adjusted for sample size and study quality were conducted using standardized tools. The study protocol is registered (PROSPERO CRD42018090857). Results Ageism led to significantly worse health outcomes in 95.5% of the studies and 74.0% of the 1,159 ageism-health associations examined. The studies reported ageism effects in all 45 countries, 11 health domains, and 25 years studied, with the prevalence of significant findings increasing over time (p < .0001). A greater prevalence of significant ageism-health findings was found in less-developed countries than more-developed countries (p = .0002). Older persons who were less educated were particularly likely to experience adverse health effects of ageism. Evidence of ageism was found across the age, sex, and race/ethnicity of the targeters (i.e., persons perpetrating ageism). Conclusion The current analysis which included over 7 million participants is the most comprehensive review of health consequences of ageism to date. Considering that the analysis revealed that the detrimental impact of ageism on older persons’ health has been occurring simultaneously at the structural and individual level in five continents, our systematic review demonstrates the pernicious reach of ageism.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                alytle@stevens.edu
                Journal
                J Soc Issues
                J Soc Issues
                10.1111/(ISSN)1540-4560
                JOSI
                The Journal of Social Issues
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0022-4537
                1540-4560
                09 August 2022
                09 August 2022
                : 10.1111/josi.12545
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Stevens Institute of Technology Hoboken New Jersey USA
                [ 2 ] Stony Brook University Stony Brook New York USA
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Ashley Lytle, College of Arts and Letters, Stevens Institute of Technology, Hoboken, NJ, USA.

                Email: alytle@ 123456stevens.edu

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0880-5930
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7056-179X
                Article
                JOSI12545
                10.1111/josi.12545
                9537920
                0736bc14-5444-45dd-acb5-9cff880aaebb
                © 2022 The Society for the Psychological Study of Social Issues.

                This article is being made freely available through PubMed Central as part of the COVID-19 public health emergency response. It can be used for unrestricted research re-use and analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source, for the duration of the public health emergency.

                History
                : 17 July 2022
                : 22 June 2022
                : 18 July 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 0, Tables: 2, Pages: 19, Words: 9841
                Categories
                Original Article
                Original Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                corrected-proof
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.2.0 mode:remove_FC converted:07.10.2022

                Comments

                Comment on this article