19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

      Submit your digital health research with an established publisher
      - celebrating 25 years of open access

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      European Hospitals’ Transition Toward Fully Electronic-Based Systems: Do Information Technology Security and Privacy Practices Follow?

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Traditionally, health information has been mainly kept in paper-based records. This has deeply changed throughout approximately the last three decades with the widespread use of multiple health information technologies. The digitization of health care systems contributes to improving health care delivery. However, it also exposes health records to security and privacy breaches inherently related to information technology (IT). Thus, health care organizations willing to leverage IT for improved health care delivery need to put in place IT security and privacy measures consistent with their use of IT resources.

          Objective

          In this study, 2 main objectives are pursued: (1) to assess the state of the implementation of IT security and privacy practices in European hospitals and (2) to assess to what extent these hospitals enhance their IT security and privacy practices as they move from paper-based systems toward fully electronic-based systems.

          Methods

          Drawing on data from the European Commission electronic health survey, we performed a cluster analysis based on IT security and privacy practices implemented in 1723 European hospitals. We also developed an IT security index, a compounded measure of implemented IT security and privacy practices, and compared it with the hospitals’ level in their transition from a paper-based system toward a fully electronic-based system.

          Results

          A total of 3 clearly distinct patterns of health IT–related security and privacy practices were unveiled. These patterns, as well as the IT security index, indicate that most of the sampled hospitals (70.2%) failed to implement basic security and privacy measures consistent with their digitization level.

          Conclusions

          Even though, on average, the most electronically advanced hospitals display a higher IT security index than hospitals where the paper system still dominates, surprisingly, it appears that the enhancement of IT security and privacy practices as the health information digitization advances in European hospitals is neither systematic nor strong enough regarding the IT-security requirements. This study will contribute to raising awareness among hospitals’ managers as to the importance of enhancing their IT security and privacy measures so that they can keep up with the security threats inherently related to the digitization of health care organizations.

          Related collections

          Most cited references44

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          THE APPLICATION OF CLUSTER ANALYSIS IN STRATEGIC MANAGEMENT RESEARCH: AN ANALYSIS AND CRITIQUE

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Definition, structure, content, use and impacts of electronic health records: a review of the research literature.

            This paper reviews the research literature on electronic health record (EHR) systems. The aim is to find out (1) how electronic health records are defined, (2) how the structure of these records is described, (3) in what contexts EHRs are used, (4) who has access to EHRs, (5) which data components of the EHRs are used and studied, (6) what is the purpose of research in this field, (7) what methods of data collection have been used in the studies reviewed and (8) what are the results of these studies. A systematic review was carried out of the research dealing with the content of EHRs. A literature search was conducted on four electronic databases: Pubmed/Medline, Cinalh, Eval and Cochrane. The concept of EHR comprised a wide range of information systems, from files compiled in single departments to longitudinal collections of patient data. Only very few papers offered descriptions of the structure of EHRs or the terminologies used. EHRs were used in primary, secondary and tertiary care. Data were recorded in EHRs by different groups of health care professionals. Secretarial staff also recorded data from dictation or nurses' or physicians' manual notes. Some information was also recorded by patients themselves; this information is validated by physicians. It is important that the needs and requirements of different users are taken into account in the future development of information systems. Several data components were documented in EHRs: daily charting, medication administration, physical assessment, admission nursing note, nursing care plan, referral, present complaint (e.g. symptoms), past medical history, life style, physical examination, diagnoses, tests, procedures, treatment, medication, discharge, history, diaries, problems, findings and immunization. In the future it will be necessary to incorporate different kinds of standardized instruments, electronic interviews and nursing documentation systems in EHR systems. The aspects of information quality most often explored in the studies reviewed were the completeness and accuracy of different data components. It has been shown in several studies that the use of an information system was conducive to more complete and accurate documentation by health care professionals. The quality of information is particularly important in patient care, but EHRs also provide important information for secondary purposes, such as health policy planning. Studies focusing on the content of EHRs are needed, especially studies of nursing documentation or patient self-documentation. One future research area is to compare the documentation of different health care professionals with the core information about EHRs which has been determined in national health projects. The challenge for ongoing national health record projects around the world is to take into account all the different types of EHRs and the needs and requirements of different health care professionals and consumers in the development of EHRs. A further challenge is the use of international terminologies in order to achieve semantic interoperability.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health information technology: an updated systematic review with a focus on meaningful use.

              Incentives offered by the U.S. government have spurred marked increases in use of health information technology (IT). To update previous reviews and examine recent evidence that relates health IT functionalities prescribed in meaningful use regulations to key aspects of health care. English-language articles in PubMed from January 2010 to August 2013. 236 studies, including pre-post and time-series designs and clinical trials that related the use of health IT to quality, safety, or efficiency. Two independent reviewers extracted data on functionality, study outcomes, and context. Fifty-seven percent of the 236 studies evaluated clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry, whereas other meaningful use functionalities were rarely evaluated. Fifty-six percent of studies reported uniformly positive results, and an additional 21% reported mixed-positive effects. Reporting of context and implementation details was poor, and 61% of studies did not report any contextual details beyond basic information. Potential for publication bias, and evaluated health IT systems and outcomes were heterogeneous and incompletely described. Strong evidence supports the use of clinical decision support and computerized provider order entry. However, insufficient reporting of implementation and context of use makes it impossible to determine why some health IT implementations are successful and others are not. The most important improvement that can be made in health IT evaluations is increased reporting of the effects of implementation and context. Office of the National Coordinator.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                JMIR Med Inform
                JMIR Med Inform
                JMI
                JMIR Medical Informatics
                JMIR Publications (Toronto, Canada )
                2291-9694
                Jan-Mar 2019
                25 March 2019
                : 7
                : 1
                : e11211
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Accounting Department Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Trois-Rivières, QC Canada
                [2 ] Department of Organization and Human Resources Management École des Sciences de la Gestion Université du Québec à Montréal Montréal, QC Canada
                [3 ] Psychology Department Université du Québec à Trois-Rivières Trois-Rivières, QC Canada
                Author notes
                Corresponding Author: Sylvestre Uwizeyemungu sylvestre.uwizeyemungu@ 123456uqtr.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-1532-8848
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7007-764X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0521-2726
                Article
                v7i1e11211
                10.2196/11211
                6452275
                30907732
                07517053-fd70-484c-a919-ca69f657d809
                ©Sylvestre Uwizeyemungu, Placide Poba-Nzaou, Michael Cantinotti. Originally published in JMIR Medical Informatics (http://medinform.jmir.org), 25.03.2019.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work, first published in JMIR Medical Informatics, is properly cited. The complete bibliographic information, a link to the original publication on http://medinform.jmir.org/.as well as this copyright and license information must be included.

                History
                : 2 June 2018
                : 6 October 2018
                : 29 November 2018
                : 29 December 2018
                Categories
                Original Paper
                Original Paper

                health information technology,data security,patient data privacy,health services,electronic health records

                Comments

                Comment on this article