14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Ascites reinfusion dialysis of refractory ascites as a bridge to kidney and liver transplantation in a patient on hemodialysis

      letter

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          To the Editor, The treatment of refractory ascites due to liver cirrhosis (LC) in end-stage renal disease (ESRD) without residual renal function is difficult. Kidney and liver transplantation is the gold standard therapy. Several procedures based on reinfusion of ascitic fluid such as intravenous reinfusion of concentrated ascites, extracorporeal ultrafiltration of ascitic fluid with peritoneal reinfusion, and ascitic fluid concentration with blood reinfusion during hemodialysis (HD) have been reported [1-4]. We herein describe an interesting case of ascites reinfusion dialysis that was performed as a bridge to kidney and liver transplantation. A 41-year-old man presented with intradialytic hypotension and refractory ascites due to decompensated LC. He was scheduled to undergo kidney and liver transplantation. For effective HD, continuous flow control reinfusion of ascitic fluid into a dialyzer was designed to prevent intradialytic hypotension and control ultrafiltration [2]. A set of dialysis tubing was connected with the sterile three-way stopcock to draw out the ascites at the speed of 500 mL/hr into the dialyzer to mix with the blood by the roller pump. Next, the mixed blood and ascites were infused into the systemic circulation during a HD session. The ultrafiltration rate of the dialyzer was maintained at approximately 1 L/hr to allow fluid removal from the blood and infused ascites in each 4-hour HD session. He underwent six sessions of ascites reinfusion dialysis over 3 weeks, after which he received a successful kidney and liver transplant. Changes in body weight and laboratory data of the patient are shown in Fig. 1. There are several important clinical implications of ascites reinfusion dialysis into the dialyzer. First, this procedure was performed in order to remove adequate fluid without intradialytic hypotension. Second, the serum albumin level increased after this procedure. In this method, elevated serum albumin level might be due to the infused protein of the ascites into the systemic circulation during HD. As a result, increased serum oncotic pressure might have pulled the interstitial fluid into the intravascular space [5]. Third, although not observed in our case, the potential adverse outcomes should be kept in mind. Spontaneous bacterial peritonitis can occur, so we performed ascitic fluid analysis and prescribed empirical antibiotics with a third generation cephalosporin to prevent peritonitis. Forth, the patient can develop hepatic encephalopathy with sluggish speech and flapping tremors despite receiving lactulose. Because of these adverse effects, we could not perform aggressive ascites reinfusion dialysis. Therefore, we believe that ascites reinfusion dialysis into the dialyzer may be an alternative method as a bridge to kidney and liver transplantation.

          Related collections

          Most cited references5

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy of extracorporeal ultrafiltration of ascitic fluid as a treatment of refractory ascites.

          Refractory ascites is recognized in patients with various conditions. Although intravenous reinjection of ascitic fluid after its filtration and concentration (IRA) is an effective method of treating this condition, many associated side-effects have been reported. We performed extracorporeal ultrafiltration of ascitic fluid (EUA) to demonstrate the efficacy and advantages of this method of treating refractory ascites.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Reinfusion and concentration of ascitic fluid during hemodialysis in a cirrhotic uremic patient.

            Management of tense ascites in cirrhotic patients on chronic hemodialysis is still a matter of speculation. A considerable problem with these patients is the frequent occurrence of hypotension during ultrafiltration. We describe a patient in whom ascitic fluid was reinfused on the arterial line and ultrafiltrated during standard treatment by using a single dialysis monitor, standard dialysis (SD) lines, and a standard hollow-fiber dialyzer. After 30 to 60 minutes of dialysis, with the patient lying on his left side, a gauge #16 IV catheter was introduced into the left lower abdomen and connected to the reinfusion line. The ascitic fluid was pumped from the abdomen to the arterious inlet of the coil at 500 to 2,000 mL/hr and ultrafiltered. In an individual patient, 13 sessions of ascites reinfusion-ultrafiltration dialysis (ARD) were performed over 3 months and compared with 18 SD sessions performed during the same period. In all procedures, the same SD equipment was used. During ARD, the average weight loss was 2.9 (SD 1.0) kg compared with a weight loss of 0.3 (0.04) kg during SD (P < 0.01). Baseline mean blood pressure was similar in both procedures; after starting dialysis, mean arterial pressure (MAP) dropped by an average of 15 mm Hg at 30 and 60 minutes. Subsequently, during ARD, MAP increased progressively by an average of 20 mm Hg at 180 minutes, whereas MAP did not change significantly during SD. Comparison between procedures by nonparametric one-way analysis of variance showed that body weight became significantly different at 120, 150, and 180 minutes (P < 0.01) and MAP at 150 and 180 minutes (P < 0.02 and P < 0.01, respectively). No major complications occurred. During ARD, on average urea reduction rate was 67%. ARD may represent an effective and safe combination between hemodialysis and the palliative treatment of tense ascites in cirrhotic uremic patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Concentrated ascitic fluid reinfusion in cirrhotic patients: a simplified method.

              A new method for ascites filtration and reinfusion, which uses a single Cuprophan filter and is performed in the dialysis unit, is reported. Thirty-one procedures were performed in 17 patients with cirrhosis and massive ascites. A mean volume of 8.6 L of ascitic fluid was removed; from this volume, 5 L were ultrafiltered and a concentrated ascitic fluid was reinfused (x = 359.8 mL). The whole procedure was completed in a mean time of 248 minutes. No relevant method-related complications were detected. Moreover, no significant changes in blood urea nitrogen (BUN), creatinine, plasma and urinary electrolytes, or platelet count were found, even in the case of repeated procedures (two to nine times). The reinfused fluid contained a mean value of albumin of 4.7 g/dL and significant amounts of globulins and complement. The overall cost of the materials used in the procedure ($49.46) offered competitive advantages with respect to other types of frequently used methods. In conclusion, we present a safe, effective, and time- and cost-saving technique for ascites reinfusion that represents an advantageous alternative to more complicated and expensive methods or to the currently used medical therapy.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Korean J Intern Med
                Korean J. Intern. Med
                KJIM
                The Korean Journal of Internal Medicine
                The Korean Association of Internal Medicine
                1226-3303
                2005-6648
                March 2017
                19 January 2016
                : 32
                : 2
                : 363-364
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, St. Vincent’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Suwon, Korea
                [2 ]Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, Uijeongbu, Korea
                Author notes
                Correspondence to Young Soo Kim, M.D. Division of Nephrology, Department of Internal Medicine, College of Medicine, Uijeongbu St. Mary’s Hospital, The Catholic University of Korea, 271 Cheonbo-ro, Uijeongbu 11765, Korea Tel: +82-31-820-3039 Fax: +82-31-847-2719 E-mail: dr52916@ 123456catholic.ac.kr
                Article
                kjim-2015-094
                10.3904/kjim.2015.094
                5339457
                26782038
                075a8156-7053-41d9-a0a4-3e9218813609
                Copyright © 2017 The Korean Association of Internal Medicine

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Non-Commercial License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/3.0/) which permits unrestricted noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 7 April 2015
                : 19 June 2015
                : 28 June 2015
                Categories
                Letter to the Editor

                Internal medicine
                ascites,renal dialysis,liver failure
                Internal medicine
                ascites, renal dialysis, liver failure

                Comments

                Comment on this article