0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Effects of Glucose-Insulin-Potassium Infusion on the Angina Response during Treadmill Exercise

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The effects of glucose-insulin-potassium (GIK) and placebo normal saline (S) infusion on treadmill-walking time to angina, ST depression, heart rate (HR), systolic blood pressure (SBP), rate pressure product (RPP), blood glucose (G), lactate (L) and free fatty acids (FFA) were studied in 14 non diabetic patients with exertional angina. For the whole group, the post-GIK walking time to angina (393 ± 33 sec, mean ± SEM) was greater than the values during control GIK (319 ± 20 sec, p < 0.02) and post-S infusion (334 ± 23 sec, p < 0.05), but circulatory and ST responses were similar in post-GIK and post-S studies. 7 of the 14 patients experienced significantly greater improvement in exercise tolerance following GIK (467 ± 39 sec) in comparison to control GIK (313 ± 29 sec, p < 0.001) and post-S infusion (334 ± 32 sec, p < 0.005) and exercised to a higher HR, SBP and RPP after GIK than after S infusion. At the onset of angina these patients had similar ST-segment depression before and after GIK but when ST segments were assessed after GIK at the same exercise duration when angina had occurred during the control and post-S studies, there was significantly less ST depression (p < 0.01). Of the remaining 7 patients exercise tolerance following GIK deteriorated in 3, remained unchanged in 2 and increased by 12 and 48 sec in 2 patients in comparison to post-S values. Comparison of post-GIK and post-S values for G, L and FFA for the whole group showed significantly lower resting values of FFA and post-exercise values of G following GIK infusion. The differences in clinical and circulatory responses between patients who improved and those who did not improve following GIK were not related to the angiographically determined severity of coronary artery disease or to GIK-induced metabolic changes. Results suggest that some patients with angina pectoris do benefit from GIK infusion but the response in a given patient to this therapeutic modality is unpredictable.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          CRD
          Cardiology
          10.1159/issn.0008-6312
          Cardiology
          S. Karger AG
          0008-6312
          1421-9751
          1979
          1979
          31 October 2008
          : 64
          : 6
          : 333-349
          Affiliations
          Division of Cardiology, Department of Medicine, Queen’s University, Kingston, Ont.
          Article
          170632 Cardiology 1979;64:333–349
          10.1159/000170632
          389419
          © 1979 S. Karger AG, Basel

          Copyright: All rights reserved. No part of this publication may be translated into other languages, reproduced or utilized in any form or by any means, electronic or mechanical, including photocopying, recording, microcopying, or by any information storage and retrieval system, without permission in writing from the publisher. Drug Dosage: The authors and the publisher have exerted every effort to ensure that drug selection and dosage set forth in this text are in accord with current recommendations and practice at the time of publication. However, in view of ongoing research, changes in government regulations, and the constant flow of information relating to drug therapy and drug reactions, the reader is urged to check the package insert for each drug for any changes in indications and dosage and for added warnings and precautions. This is particularly important when the recommended agent is a new and/or infrequently employed drug. Disclaimer: The statements, opinions and data contained in this publication are solely those of the individual authors and contributors and not of the publishers and the editor(s). The appearance of advertisements or/and product references in the publication is not a warranty, endorsement, or approval of the products or services advertised or of their effectiveness, quality or safety. The publisher and the editor(s) disclaim responsibility for any injury to persons or property resulting from any ideas, methods, instructions or products referred to in the content or advertisements.

          Page count
          Pages: 17
          Categories
          Original Paper

          Comments

          Comment on this article