41
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Standards in Pupillography

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The number of research groups studying the pupil is increasing, as is the number of publications. Consequently, new standards in pupillography are needed to formalize the methodology including recording conditions, stimulus characteristics, as well as suitable parameters of evaluation. Since the description of intrinsically photosensitive retinal ganglion cells (ipRGCs) there has been an increased interest and broader application of pupillography in ophthalmology as well as other fields including psychology and chronobiology. Color pupillography plays an important role not only in research but also in clinical observational and therapy studies like gene therapy of hereditary retinal degenerations and psychopathology. Stimuli can vary in size, brightness, duration, and wavelength. Stimulus paradigms determine whether rhodopsin-driven rod responses, opsin-driven cone responses, or melanopsin-driven ipRGC responses are primarily elicited. Background illumination, adaptation state, and instruction for the participants will furthermore influence the results. This standard recommends a minimum set of variables to be used for pupillography and specified in the publication methodologies. Initiated at the 32nd International Pupil Colloquium 2017 in Morges, Switzerland, the aim of this manuscript is to outline standards in pupillography based on current knowledge and experience of pupil experts in order to achieve greater comparability of pupillographic studies. Such standards will particularly facilitate the proper application of pupillography by researchers new to the field. First we describe general standards, followed by specific suggestions concerning the demands of different targets of pupil research: the afferent and efferent reflex arc, pharmacology, psychology, sleepiness-related research and animal studies.

          Related collections

          Most cited references207

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The pupil as a measure of emotional arousal and autonomic activation.

          Pupil diameter was monitored during picture viewing to assess effects of hedonic valence and emotional arousal on pupillary responses. Autonomic activity (heart rate and skin conductance) was concurrently measured to determine whether pupillary changes are mediated by parasympathetic or sympathetic activation. Following an initial light reflex, pupillary changes were larger when viewing emotionally arousing pictures, regardless of whether these were pleasant or unpleasant. Pupillary changes during picture viewing covaried with skin conductance change, supporting the interpretation that sympathetic nervous system activity modulates these changes in the context of affective picture viewing. Taken together, the data provide strong support for the hypothesis that the pupil's response during affective picture viewing reflects emotional arousal associated with increased sympathetic activity.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Task-evoked pupillary responses, processing load, and the structure of processing resources.

            J Beatty (1982)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in primate retina signal colour and irradiance and project to the LGN.

              Human vision starts with the activation of rod photoreceptors in dim light and short (S)-, medium (M)-, and long (L)- wavelength-sensitive cone photoreceptors in daylight. Recently a parallel, non-rod, non-cone photoreceptive pathway, arising from a population of retinal ganglion cells, was discovered in nocturnal rodents. These ganglion cells express the putative photopigment melanopsin and by signalling gross changes in light intensity serve the subconscious, 'non-image-forming' functions of circadian photoentrainment and pupil constriction. Here we show an anatomically distinct population of 'giant', melanopsin-expressing ganglion cells in the primate retina that, in addition to being intrinsically photosensitive, are strongly activated by rods and cones, and display a rare, S-Off, (L + M)-On type of colour-opponent receptive field. The intrinsic, rod and (L + M) cone-derived light responses combine in these giant cells to signal irradiance over the full dynamic range of human vision. In accordance with cone-based colour opponency, the giant cells project to the lateral geniculate nucleus, the thalamic relay to primary visual cortex. Thus, in the diurnal trichromatic primate, 'non-image-forming' and conventional 'image-forming' retinal pathways are merged, and the melanopsin-based signal might contribute to conscious visual perception.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Neurol
                Front Neurol
                Front. Neurol.
                Frontiers in Neurology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                1664-2295
                22 February 2019
                2019
                : 10
                : 129
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Pupil Research Group, Centre for Ophthalmology, University Hospitals Tübingen , Tübingen, Germany
                [2] 2Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Wisconsin School of Medicine and Public Health , Madison, AL, United States
                [3] 3Institute of Health and Biomedical Innovation, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [4] 4School of Biomedical Sciences, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [5] 5Queensland Eye Institute , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                [6] 6Department of Ophthalmology and Visual Sciences, University of Alabama at Birmingham , Birmingham, AL, United States
                [7] 7Neuro-Ophthalmology Division, University of Iowa and Iowa City VA Healthcare System , Iowa City, LA, United States
                [8] 8Department of Psychology, University of Pittsburgh , Pittsburgh, PA, United States
                [9] 9VA Pittsburgh Healthcare System, VISN 4 MIRECC, University Drive C , Pittsburgh, PA, United States
                [10] 10Department of Psychiatry, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine , Pittsburgh, PA, United States
                [11] 11Developmental Psychiatry, University of Nottingham , Nottingham, United Kingdom
                [12] 12School of Optometry and Vision Science, Queensland University of Technology , Brisbane, QLD, Australia
                Author notes

                Edited by: Heather Moss, Stanford University, United States

                Reviewed by: Jason C. Park, University of Illinois at Chicago, United States; Dan Milea, Singapore National Eye Center, Singapore; Sebastiaan Mathôt, Aix-Marseille Université, France

                *Correspondence: Carina Kelbsch carina.kelbsch@ 123456med.uni-tuebingen.de

                This article was submitted to Neuro-Ophthalmology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Neurology

                Article
                10.3389/fneur.2019.00129
                6395400
                30853933
                07ba302a-569f-4d41-b255-5ec31de90032
                Copyright © 2019 Kelbsch, Strasser, Chen, Feigl, Gamlin, Kardon, Peters, Roecklein, Steinhauer, Szabadi, Zele, Wilhelm and Wilhelm.

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 05 October 2018
                : 31 January 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 2, Equations: 0, References: 244, Pages: 26, Words: 22154
                Categories
                Neurology
                Review

                Neurology
                clinical standards,pupillography,application of pupillography,stimulus characteristics,parameters of evaluation,analysis,pupillometry

                Comments

                Comment on this article