3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: not found
      • Article: not found

      SCAI expert consensus update on best practices in the cardiac catheterization laboratory : This statement was endorsed by the American College of Cardiology (ACC), the American Heart Association (AHA), and the Heart Rhythm Society (HRS) in April 2021

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Related collections

          Most cited references114

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          2013 ACCF/AHA guideline for the management of ST-elevation myocardial infarction: a report of the American College of Cardiology Foundation/American Heart Association Task Force on Practice Guidelines.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            A simple risk score for prediction of contrast-induced nephropathy after percutaneous coronary intervention: development and initial validation.

            We sought to develop a simple risk score of contrast-induced nephropathy (CIN) after percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Although several risk factors for CIN have been identified, the cumulative risk rendered by their combination is unknown. A total of 8,357 patients were randomly assigned to a development and a validation dataset. The baseline clinical and procedural characteristics of the 5,571 patients in the development dataset were considered as candidate univariate predictors of CIN (increase >or=25% and/or >or=0.5 mg/dl in serum creatinine at 48 h after PCI vs. baseline). Multivariate logistic regression was then used to identify independent predictors of CIN with a p value 75 years, anemia, and volume of contrast) were assigned a weighted integer; the sum of the integers was a total risk score for each patient. The overall occurrence of CIN in the development set was 13.1% (range 7.5% to 57.3% for a low [ or=16] risk score, respectively); the rate of CIN increased exponentially with increasing risk score (Cochran Armitage chi-square, p < 0.0001). In the 2,786 patients of the validation dataset, the model demonstrated good discriminative power (c statistic = 0.67); the increasing risk score was again strongly associated with CIN (range 8.4% to 55.9% for a low and high risk score, respectively). The risk of CIN after PCI can be simply assessed using readily available information. This risk score can be used for both clinical and investigational purposes.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Practice guidelines for sedation and analgesia by non-anesthesiologists.

              (2002)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                (View ORCID Profile)
                Journal
                Catheterization and Cardiovascular Interventions
                Catheter Cardiovasc Interv
                Wiley
                1522-1946
                1522-726X
                May 19 2021
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Cardiology Westchester Medical Center and New York Medical College Valhalla New York USA
                [2 ]Cardiovascular Institute of Lifespan, Division of Cardiology Warren Alpert Medical School of Brown University Providence Rhode Island USA
                [3 ]Department of Medicine Vanderbilt University Medical Center Nashville Tennessee USA
                [4 ]Cardiology Division The University of New Mexico Albuquerque New Mexico USA
                [5 ]Minneapolis Heart Institute Minneapolis Minnesota USA
                [6 ]Mass General Brigham Salem Hospital Salem Massachusetts USA
                [7 ]Piedmont Heart Institute Atlanta Georgia USA
                [8 ]The Cardiac and Vascular Institute and North Florida Regional Medical Center Gainesville Florida USA
                [9 ]HCA Healthcare Nashville Tennessee USA
                [10 ]Duke University Medical Center and Duke Clinical Research Institute Durham North Carolina USA
                [11 ]Confluence Health Wenatchee Washington USA
                [12 ]Division of Cardiology, New York Presbyterian Weill Cornell Medicine Population Health Sciences Queens New York USA
                [13 ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine University of Utah Health Salt Lake City Utah USA
                [14 ]Division of Cardiovascular Medicine Perelman School of Medicine, Hospital of the University of Pennsylvania Philadelphia Pennsylvania USA
                Article
                10.1002/ccd.29744
                33909349
                082879f1-0721-4b89-9e9e-9a1784be02c4
                © 2021

                http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/termsAndConditions#vor

                http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/tdm_license_1.1

                History

                Comments

                Comment on this article