24
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Impact of Canada’s menthol cigarette ban on quitting among menthol smokers: pooled analysis of pre–post evaluation from the ITC Project and the Ontario Menthol Ban Study and projections of impact in the USA

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          Between 2015 and 2018, Canada banned menthol cigarettes. This study pooled data from two pre–post cohort studies (the Ontario Menthol Ban Study, and the International Tobacco Control Policy Evaluation (ITC) Canada Survey, conducted in seven provinces) to derive more precise estimates of the impact of Canada’s menthol ban on quitting and to apply these estimates to project the impact of a menthol ban in the USA.

          Methods

          Weighted multivariable logistic analyses compared post-ban quit success of menthol smokers with non-menthol smokers (for daily smokers and for all (daily + non-daily) smokers), controlling for sex, age, ethnicity, education, baseline smoking status, baseline cigarettes per day and study regions. Projections to the USA were created by multiplying the effect size of the Canadian menthol ban on quitting (percentage of increased quitting among menthol smokers) by the number of menthol smokers overall and among African Americans, from the 2019 National Survey on Drug Use and Health.

          Results

          After the menthol cigarette ban, menthol smokers were more likely than non-menthol smokers to have quit smoking among daily smokers (difference=8.0%; 95% CI: 2.4% to 13.7%,p=0.005) and all (daily+non-daily) smokers (difference=7.3%; 95% CI: 2.1% to 12.5%,p=0.006). The projected number of smokers who would quit after a US menthol ban would be 789 724 daily smokers (including 199 732 African Americans) and 1 337 988 daily+non-daily smokers (including 381 272 African Americans).

          Conclusions

          This pooled analysis of Canada’s menthol cigarette ban provides the foundation for estimating the impact of menthol bans in the USA and other countries. Projections suggest that a US menthol cigarette ban would have a substantial impact on increasing quitting.

          Related collections

          Most cited references19

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The Environment and Disease: Association or Causation?

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            The Planning of Observational Studies of Human Populations

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Changes in the prevalence and correlates of menthol cigarette use in the USA, 2004–2014

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Tob Control
                Tob Control
                tobaccocontrol
                tc
                Tobacco Control
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0964-4563
                1468-3318
                November 2023
                28 April 2022
                : 32
                : 6
                : 734-738
                Affiliations
                [1 ] departmentDepartment of Psychology , University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
                [2 ] School of Public Health Systems, University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
                [3 ] Ontario Institute for Cancer Research , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [4 ] departmentDepartment of Statistics & Actuarial Science , University of Waterloo , Waterloo, Ontario, Canada
                [5 ] departmentPsychiatry & Behavioral Sciences , Medical University of South Carolina , Charleston, South Carolina, USA
                [6 ] departmentDepartment of Health Behavior , Roswell Park Cancer Institute , Buffalo, New York, USA
                [7 ] departmentLombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center , Georgetown University , Washington, District of Columbia, USA
                [8 ] departmentRutgers Center for Tobacco Studies , Rutgers Biomedical and Health Sciences , New Brunswick, New Jersey, USA
                [9 ] departmentPsychology and Center for the Study of Tobacco Products , Virginia Commonwealth University , Richmond, Virginia, USA
                [10 ] departmentDepartment of Health Education and Promotion , East Carolina University , Greenville, North Carolina, USA
                [11 ] departmentOntario Tobacco Research Unit , University of Toronto, Dalla Lana School of Public Health , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                [12 ] departmentInstitute for Global Tobacco Control , Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health , Baltimore, Maryland, USA
                [13 ] departmentDepartment of Public Health Sciences , University of Toronto , Toronto, Ontario, Canada
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Geoffrey T Fong, Department of Psychology and School of Public Health Sciences, University of Waterloo, Waterloo, ON N2L 3G1, Canada; gfong@ 123456uwaterloo.ca
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-9098-6472
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9139-8100
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5269-1817
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-7103-7017
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-0644-182X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-5280-3612
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-8277-5437
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2740-5633
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-7838-0769
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-3869-3637
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-9589-2122
                Article
                tobaccocontrol-2021-057227
                10.1136/tobaccocontrol-2021-057227
                9613818
                35483720
                082bdc6e-d086-4bd7-89c5-407b4d5480ca
                © Author(s) (or their employer(s)) 2023. Re-use permitted under CC BY-NC. No commercial re-use. See rights and permissions. Published by BMJ.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the Creative Commons Attribution Non Commercial (CC BY-NC 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt, build upon this work non-commercially, and license their derivative works on different terms, provided the original work is properly cited, appropriate credit is given, any changes made indicated, and the use is non-commercial. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.

                History
                : 15 December 2021
                : 14 April 2022
                Funding
                Funded by: US National Cancer Institute and US Food & Drug Administration;
                Award ID: U54CA229973
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000024, Canadian Institutes of Health Research;
                Award ID: FDN-148477
                Funded by: US National Institute of Drug Abuse and US Food & Drug Administration Center for Tobacco Products;
                Award ID: P50DA036105
                Award ID: R21DA04735801
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100004203, Ontario Institute for Cancer Research;
                Award ID: Senior Investigator Award
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000521, Canadian Cancer Society;
                Award ID: O. Harold Warwick Prize
                Funded by: US National Cancer Institute;
                Award ID: P01CA200512
                Categories
                Original Research
                1506
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Public health
                public policy,cessation,surveillance and monitoring
                Public health
                public policy, cessation, surveillance and monitoring

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content254

                Cited by6

                Most referenced authors131