14
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Antimelanoma activity of 1,3,4-thiadiazolium mesoionics: a structure-activity relationship study.

      Anti-Cancer Drugs
      Animals, Antineoplastic Agents, chemistry, pharmacology, therapeutic use, Cell Survival, drug effects, physiology, Dose-Response Relationship, Drug, Female, Growth Inhibitors, Male, Melanoma, Experimental, drug therapy, Mice, Mice, Inbred C57BL, Structure-Activity Relationship, Thiadiazoles, Xenograft Model Antitumor Assays, methods

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPubMed
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The effect of a series of 4-phenyl-5-(2'-Y, 4'-X or 4'-X-cinnamoyl)-1,3,4-thiadiazolium-2-phenylamine chlorides was evaluated against B16-F10 murine melanoma cells in vitro and against tumors resulting from implanted B16-F10 cells in C57BL/6 mice. These compounds differ from each other only at the cinnamoyl ring substituent (MI-J, X=OH; MI-2,4diF, X=Y=F; MI-4F, X=F and MI-D, X=NO2). The results were compared with those obtained for MI-D, which has already been shown to be a potent and promising drug against melanoma. On exposure of B16-F10 cells to MI-D, MI-2,4diF and MI-4F, all of them at the same micromolar concentration (50 microM) decreased the cell viability to 8, 50 and 22%, respectively, while MI-J did not show any significant effect under the same conditions. However, low doses such as 10 microM MI-D were sufficient to impair cell growth over 72 h, but for MI-2,4diF and MI-4F the effect on B16-F10 proliferation was only observed at a concentration of 25 microM. Furthermore, MI-4F had a slightly better effect than MI-2,4diF in vitro; its effect on tumor growth in vivo was not significant. MI-D inhibited tumor growth by 77%. The greater effectiveness of MI-D compared with MI-2,4diF, MI-4F and MI-J against B16-F10 melanoma cells is probably due to its stronger electron-withdrawing group (NO2), which increases the positive charge on the mesoionic ring and allows extensive conjugation of the side-chain with the exocyclic moiety. This seems to be important for degree of anti-tumor activity of these compounds.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Comments

          Comment on this article