2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Association of Preoperative Chemosensitivity With Postoperative Survival in Patients With Resected Gastric Adenocarcinoma

      research-article
      , MD 1 , , MS 2 , , MD, MPH 1 , , MD, MPH 1 , , MD, PhD 3 , , MD 4 , , MD, MS 1 ,
      JAMA Network Open
      American Medical Association

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Key Points

          Question

          Is preoperative chemosensitivity associated with increased survival among patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who undergo postoperative chemotherapy?

          Findings

          In this national cohort study of 2382 patients, postoperative chemotherapy was significantly associated with longer postoperative survival in patients with chemosensitive disease but not in those with very sensitive or refractory disease.

          Meaning

          These findings suggest that preoperative chemosensitivity may be helpful in making the decision regarding postoperative chemotherapy for patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma.

          Abstract

          This cohort study examines whether preoperative chemosensitivity is associated with postoperative survival among patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who receive postoperative chemotherapy.

          Abstract

          Importance

          Considering its low completion rate, the survival benefit associated with postoperative chemotherapy (PC) is unclear in patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who received preoperative chemotherapy.

          Objective

          To determine whether preoperative chemosensitivity is associated with postoperative survival among patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who receive PC.

          Design, Setting, and Participants

          This national, hospital-based cohort study used data from the National Cancer Database, which covers more than 70% newly diagnosed gastric adenocarcinomas in the US, between 2006 and 2017. Participants included patients with clinical stage II or III disease treated with preoperative chemotherapy and curative-intent resection, excluding radiotherapy. Preoperative chemosensitivity was defined as very sensitive (ypT0N0), sensitive (pathological TNM stage less than clinical, excluding ypT0N0), and refractory (pathological greater than or equal to clinical). Data were analyzed in April 2021.

          Exposures

          Receipt of PC or not.

          Main Outcomes and Measures

          Overall survival from surgical discharge.

          Results

          This study included 2382 patients (1599 men [67%]; median [IQR] age, 63 [54-70] years). Most patients (1524 patients [64%]) received no PC. Most patients (1483 patients [62%]) had refractory disease, followed by sensitive disease (727 patients [31%]) and very sensitive disease (172 patients [7%]). Patients with older age (odds ratio [OR], 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), comorbidity (OR, 0.71; 95% CI, 0.57-0.90), longer time from chemotherapy initiation to surgery (OR, 0.99; 95% CI, 0.97-1.00), less sensitivity to preoperative chemotherapy (very sensitive vs refractory OR, 0.58; 95% CI, 0.37-0.89; sensitive vs refractory OR, 0.96; 95% CI, 0.76-1.20), and longer surgical hospitalization (OR, 0.95; 95% CI, 0.93-0.97) had a significantly lower likelihood of receiving PC. PC was not associated with improved survival in the whole group (hazard ratio [HR], 0.88; 95% CI, 0.75-1.02). Patients with refractory disease had the worst survival compared with patients with sensitive disease (HR, 0.39; 95% CI, 0.32-0.46) and those with very sensitive disease (HR, 0.12; 95% CI, 0.07-0.20). Preoperative chemosensitivity was significantly associated with the survival benefit from PC ( P for interaction = .03). PC was significantly associated with longer survival in patients with sensitive disease (5-year survival rate, 73.8% in the PC group vs 65.0% in the no PC group; HR, 0.64; 95% CI, 0.46-0.91), but not in those with very sensitive disease (5-year survival rate, 80.0% in the PC group vs 90.8% in the no PC group; HR, 2.45; 95% CI, 0.81-7.43) and those with refractory disease (5-year survival rate, 41.8% in the PC group vs 40.7% in the no PC group; HR, 0.93; 95% CI, 0.79-1.10).

          Conclusions and Relevance

          In this cohort study, preoperative chemosensitivity was associated with survival among patients with resectable gastric adenocarcinoma who received PC. These findings may help inform future studies to personalize postoperative therapy.

          Related collections

          Most cited references14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Perioperative chemotherapy versus surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal cancer.

          A regimen of epirubicin, cisplatin, and infused fluorouracil (ECF) improves survival among patients with incurable locally advanced or metastatic gastric adenocarcinoma. We assessed whether the addition of a perioperative regimen of ECF to surgery improves outcomes among patients with potentially curable gastric cancer. We randomly assigned patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the stomach, esophagogastric junction, or lower esophagus to either perioperative chemotherapy and surgery (250 patients) or surgery alone (253 patients). Chemotherapy consisted of three preoperative and three postoperative cycles of intravenous epirubicin (50 mg per square meter of body-surface area) and cisplatin (60 mg per square meter) on day 1, and a continuous intravenous infusion of fluorouracil (200 mg per square meter per day) for 21 days. The primary end point was overall survival. ECF-related adverse effects were similar to those previously reported among patients with advanced gastric cancer. Rates of postoperative complications were similar in the perioperative-chemotherapy group and the surgery group (46 percent and 45 percent, respectively), as were the numbers of deaths within 30 days after surgery. The resected tumors were significantly smaller and less advanced in the perioperative-chemotherapy group. With a median follow-up of four years, 149 patients in the perioperative-chemotherapy group and 170 in the surgery group had died. As compared with the surgery group, the perioperative-chemotherapy group had a higher likelihood of overall survival (hazard ratio for death, 0.75; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.60 to 0.93; P=0.009; five-year survival rate, 36 percent vs. 23 percent) and of progression-free survival (hazard ratio for progression, 0.66; 95 percent confidence interval, 0.53 to 0.81; P<0.001). In patients with operable gastric or lower esophageal adenocarcinomas, a perioperative regimen of ECF decreased tumor size and stage and significantly improved progression-free and overall survival. (Current Controlled Trials number, ISRCTN93793971 [controlled-trials.com].). Copyright 2006 Massachusetts Medical Society.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Perioperative chemotherapy with fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin, and docetaxel versus fluorouracil or capecitabine plus cisplatin and epirubicin for locally advanced, resectable gastric or gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma (FLOT4): a randomised, phase 2/3 trial

            Docetaxel-based chemotherapy is effective in metastatic gastric and gastro-oesophageal junction adenocarcinoma. This study reports on the safety and efficacy of the docetaxel-based triplet FLOT (fluorouracil plus leucovorin, oxaliplatin and docetaxel) as a perioperative therapy for patients with locally advanced, resectable tumours.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Perioperative chemotherapy compared with surgery alone for resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma: an FNCLCC and FFCD multicenter phase III trial.

              After curative resection, the prognosis of gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma is poor. This phase III trial was designed to evaluate the benefit in overall survival (OS) of perioperative fluorouracil plus cisplatin in resectable gastroesophageal adenocarcinoma. Overall, 224 patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, gastroesophageal junction (GEJ), or stomach were randomly assigned to either perioperative chemotherapy and surgery (CS group; n = 113) or surgery alone (S group; n = 111). Chemotherapy consisted of two or three preoperative cycles of intravenous cisplatin (100 mg/m(2)) on day 1, and a continuous intravenous infusion of fluorouracil (800 mg/m(2)/d) for 5 consecutive days (days 1 to 5) every 28 days and three or four postoperative cycles of the same regimen. The primary end point was OS. Compared with the S group, the CS group had a better OS (5-year rate 38% v 24%; hazard ratio [HR] for death: 0.69; 95% CI, 0.50 to 0.95; P = .02); and a better disease-free survival (5-year rate: 34% v 19%; HR, 0.65; 95% CI, 0.48 to 0.89; P = .003). In the multivariable analysis, the favorable prognostic factors for survival were perioperative chemotherapy (P = .01) and stomach tumor localization (P < .01). Perioperative chemotherapy significantly improved the curative resection rate (84% v 73%; P = .04). Grade 3 to 4 toxicity occurred in 38% of CS patients (mainly neutropenia) but postoperative morbidity was similar in the two groups. In patients with resectable adenocarcinoma of the lower esophagus, GEJ, or stomach, perioperative chemotherapy using fluorouracil plus cisplatin significantly increased the curative resection rate, disease-free survival, and OS.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Netw Open
                JAMA Network Open
                American Medical Association
                2574-3805
                19 November 2021
                November 2021
                19 November 2021
                : 4
                : 11
                : e2135340
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Medicine, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
                [2 ]Department of Biostatistics, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
                [3 ]Department of Surgery, Mayo Clinic, Jacksonville, Florida
                [4 ]Department of Surgical Oncology, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, New York
                Author notes
                Article Information
                Accepted for Publication: September 24, 2021.
                Published: November 19, 2021. doi:10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35340
                Open Access: This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License. © 2021 Deng L et al. JAMA Network Open.
                Corresponding Author: Sarbajit Mukherjee, MD, MS, Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Elm and Carlton St, Buffalo, NY 14263 ( sarbajit.mukherjee@ 123456roswellpark.org ).
                Author Contributions: Drs Deng and Mukherjee had full access to all of the data in the study and take responsibility for the integrity of the data and the accuracy of the data analysis.
                Concept and design: Deng, Gabriel, Kukar, Mukherjee.
                Acquisition, analysis, or interpretation of data: Deng, Groman, Jiang, Perimbeti, Mukherjee.
                Drafting of the manuscript: Deng, Groman, Perimbeti, Mukherjee.
                Critical revision of the manuscript for important intellectual content: Deng, Jiang, Gabriel, Kukar, Mukherjee.
                Statistical analysis: Deng, Groman, Jiang.
                Supervision: Gabriel, Kukar, Mukherjee.
                Conflict of Interest Disclosures: None reported.
                Funding/Support: This work was supported by National Cancer Institute grant P30CA016056 involving the use of Roswell Park Cancer Institute’s Biostatistics Shared Resource. The funding supports the analysis of the data.
                Role of the Funder/Sponsor: The funder had no role in the design and conduct of the study; collection, management, analysis, and interpretation of the data; preparation, review, or approval of the manuscript; and decision to submit the manuscript for publication.
                Article
                zoi210995
                10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2021.35340
                8605482
                34797369
                086c9d97-415a-4bfe-b23b-41736d066c59
                Copyright 2021 Deng L et al. JAMA Network Open.

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the CC-BY License.

                History
                : 7 May 2021
                : 24 September 2021
                Categories
                Research
                Original Investigation
                Online Only
                Oncology

                Comments

                Comment on this article