2
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Effect of Age on Clinical Outcomes Following On-/Off-Pump Coronary Artery Bypass: Meta-Analysis and Meta-Regression

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          There is currently much debate about which patients would benefit more after on- or off-pump coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). The aim of this meta-analysis and meta-regression is to investigate the effect of age on short-term clinical outcomes after these approaches.

          Methods

          To identify potential studies, systematic searches were carried out in the Excerpta Medica dataBASE (EMBASE), PubMed, Web of Science, and the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL). The search strategy included the key concepts of “cardiopulmonary bypass” AND “coronary artery bypass grafting” AND “off pump” OR “on pump”. This was followed by a meta-analysis and meta-regression investigating the effect of age on the incidences of stroke, myocardial infarction (MI), and mortality.

          Results

          Thirty-seven studies including 15,324 participants were analysed. Overall, there was a significant odds reduction for patients receiving off-pump CABG suffering a stroke (odds ratio [OR] 0.770, 95% confidence intervals [CI] 0.594, 0.998, P=0.048); however, when patients were subdivided according to different age bands, this difference disappeared. There were also no significant differences in the odds of mortality (OR 0.876, 95% CI 0.703, 1.093, P=0.241) or MI (OR 0.937, 95% CI 0.795, 1.105, P=0.439). Meta-regression analysis revealed no significant relationship between age and stroke ( P=0.652), age and mortality ( P=548), and age and MI ( P=0.464).

          Conclusion

          Patients undergoing CABG are becoming older and may suffer from multiple comorbidities increasing their risk profile. However, with respect to short-term clinical outcomes, the patient’s age does not help in determining whether off- or on-pump is superior.

          Related collections

          Most cited references59

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement.

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias in randomised trials

            Flaws in the design, conduct, analysis, and reporting of randomised trials can cause the effect of an intervention to be underestimated or overestimated. The Cochrane Collaboration’s tool for assessing risk of bias aims to make the process clearer and more accurate
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessing the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials: is blinding necessary?

              It has been suggested that the quality of clinical trials should be assessed by blinded raters to limit the risk of introducing bias into meta-analyses and systematic reviews, and into the peer-review process. There is very little evidence in the literature to substantiate this. This study describes the development of an instrument to assess the quality of reports of randomized clinical trials (RCTs) in pain research and its use to determine the effect of rater blinding on the assessments of quality. A multidisciplinary panel of six judges produced an initial version of the instrument. Fourteen raters from three different backgrounds assessed the quality of 36 research reports in pain research, selected from three different samples. Seven were allocated randomly to perform the assessments under blind conditions. The final version of the instrument included three items. These items were scored consistently by all the raters regardless of background and could discriminate between reports from the different samples. Blind assessments produced significantly lower and more consistent scores than open assessments. The implications of this finding for systematic reviews, meta-analytic research and the peer-review process are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: MD
                Role: MD
                Role: MD
                Role: MD
                Journal
                Braz J Cardiovasc Surg
                Braz J Cardiovasc Surg
                rbccv
                Brazilian Journal of Cardiovascular Surgery
                Sociedade Brasileira de Cirurgia Cardiovascular
                0102-7638
                1678-9741
                Sep-Oct 2020
                Sep-Oct 2020
                : 35
                : 5
                : 797-814
                Affiliations
                [1 ]University of Plymouth, Ringgold Standard Institution, Plymouth, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland.
                [2 ]University of New England, Ringgold Standard Institution, Armidale, Australia.
                Author notes
                Correspondence Address: Nicola King, https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-5760, University of Plymouth, School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Health, Drake Circus, Plymouth PL4 8AA, United Kingdom of Great Britain and Northern Ireland. E-mail: nicola.king@ 123456plymouth.ac.uk
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6989-5760
                Article
                10.21470/1678-9741-2018-0388
                7598957
                33118746
                08750ec9-4b4b-4b35-958a-95fdfdbd09d5

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 27 November 2018
                : 27 December 2018
                Categories
                Review Article

                cardiopulmonary bypass,coronary artery bypass, off-pump,myocardial infarction,stroke,comorbidity,incidence

                Comments

                Comment on this article