73
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      A review and analysis of the use of ‘habit’ in understanding, predicting and influencing health-related behaviour

      other
      a , *
      Health Psychology Review
      Routledge
      habit, review, automaticity, behaviour change, study design

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The term ‘habit’ is widely used to predict and explain behaviour. This paper examines use of the term in the context of health-related behaviour, and explores how the concept might be made more useful. A narrative review is presented, drawing on a scoping review of 136 empirical studies and 8 literature reviews undertaken to document usage of the term ‘habit’, and methods to measure it. A coherent definition of ‘habit’, and proposals for improved methods for studying it, were derived from findings. Definitions of ‘habit’ have varied in ways that are often implicit and not coherently linked with an underlying theory. A definition is proposed whereby habit is a process by which a stimulus generates an impulse to act as a result of a learned stimulus-response association. Habit-generated impulses may compete or combine with impulses and inhibitions arising from other sources, including conscious decision-making, to influence responses, and need not generate behaviour. Most research on habit is based on correlational studies using self-report measures. Adopting a coherent definition of ‘habit’, and a wider range of paradigms, designs and measures to study it, may accelerate progress in habit theory and application.

          Related collections

          Most cited references94

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The theory of planned behavior

          Icek Ajzen (1991)
          Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 179-211
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found

            The behavior change technique taxonomy (v1) of 93 hierarchically clustered techniques: building an international consensus for the reporting of behavior change interventions.

            CONSORT guidelines call for precise reporting of behavior change interventions: we need rigorous methods of characterizing active content of interventions with precision and specificity. The objective of this study is to develop an extensive, consensually agreed hierarchically structured taxonomy of techniques [behavior change techniques (BCTs)] used in behavior change interventions. In a Delphi-type exercise, 14 experts rated labels and definitions of 124 BCTs from six published classification systems. Another 18 experts grouped BCTs according to similarity of active ingredients in an open-sort task. Inter-rater agreement amongst six researchers coding 85 intervention descriptions by BCTs was assessed. This resulted in 93 BCTs clustered into 16 groups. Of the 26 BCTs occurring at least five times, 23 had adjusted kappas of 0.60 or above. "BCT taxonomy v1," an extensive taxonomy of 93 consensually agreed, distinct BCTs, offers a step change as a method for specifying interventions, but we anticipate further development and evaluation based on international, interdisciplinary consensus.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              Psychology as the behaviorist views it.

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Health Psychol Rev
                Health Psychol Rev
                RHPR
                rhpr20
                Health Psychology Review
                Routledge
                1743-7199
                1743-7202
                7 August 2015
                21 January 2014
                : 9
                : 3
                : 277-295
                Affiliations
                [ a ]Health Behaviour Research Centre, Department of Epidemiology and Public Health, University College London , Gower Street, London WC1E 6BT, UK
                Author notes
                Article
                876238
                10.1080/17437199.2013.876238
                4566897
                25207647
                08bfdd93-3c46-4b7d-b304-77245076169d
                © 2014 The Author(s). Published by Taylor & Francis.

                This is an Open Access article. Non-commercial re-use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly attributed, cited, and is not altered, transformed, or built upon in any way, is permitted. The moral rights of the named author(s) have been asserted.

                History
                : 22 September 2013
                : 13 December 2013
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, References: 79, Pages: 19
                Categories
                Review

                habit,review,automaticity,behaviour change,study design
                habit, review, automaticity, behaviour change, study design

                Comments

                Comment on this article