22
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Is there difference in chronic pain after Suture and Stapler fixation method of mesh in Ventral Hernia? Is stapler fixation method quicker? A randomized controlled trial

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background & Objective:

          Chronic pain occurs in 20–30% of patients after hernia surgery. As a consequence of this chronic pain, almost one third of patients have limitations in daily activities. Frequency and severity of this pain varies with different techniques of hernia repair. The objective of this study was to compare polypropylene suture and skin staples for securing mesh in uncomplicated ventral hernioplasty in terms of acute and chronic postoperative pain and to compare the time taken for mesh fixation between polypropylene sutures and skin stapler in ventral hernioplasty.

          Methods:

          This study was conducted in Surgery Department of Dow University Hospital, Dow University of Health Sciences, Ojha Campus and included 53 patients from Jan 2015 to Dec 2016, after taking informed consent. All patients were operated under general anesthesia by the same surgical team. Patients were randomized into two groups; in one group mesh fixed with 2/0 polypropylene suture while in other group mesh stapler was used. Time taken to apply mesh was noted in minutes from laying the mesh over anterior rectus sheath to completion of fixation by either method. The severity of post-operative pain was measured with VAS (1-10) after one week, one month and after one year after surgery. Data was analysed using SPSS version 17.

          Results:

          Patient characteristics and operative outcome were similar in the two groups and statistically non-significant in both. Early postoperative pain was more after suture fixation but it was not statistically significant. Mean ± SD pain score was after one week 3.47±2.7 after sutures while 2.91±1.88 after stapler. After four weeks, 0.40±0.49 after suture while 0.35±0.48 after stapler fixation. In both study groups 30–34% of the patients felt some pain in follow-up after one year. Severity of pain was 0.60±0.62 after suture while 1.65±1.94 after stapler fixation which is statistically significant as well (p<0.007). Mean operative time was 15.33±6.33 minutes for suture fixation while 1.56±0.41 minutes for fixation by staples, p-value < 0.001.

          Conclusion:

          The method of fixation does not appear to cause significant difference in early post-operative pain but chronic pain is more after stapler fixation of mesh. However, operative time was reduced significantly in staple fixation group as compared to suture fixation group

          Related collections

          Most cited references 14

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Mesh-fixation method and pain and quality of life after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair: a randomized trial of three fixation techniques

          Background Persistent, activity-limiting pain after laparoscopic ventral or incisional hernia repair (LVIHR) appears to be related to fixation of the implanted mesh. A randomized study comparing commonly used fixation techniques with respect to postoperative pain and quality of life has not previously been reported. Methods A total of 199 patients undergoing non-urgent LVIHR in our unit between August 2005 and July 2008 were randomly assigned to one of three mesh-fixation groups: absorbable sutures (AS) with tacks; double crown (DC), which involved two circles of tacks and no sutures; and nonabsorbable sutures (NS) with tacks. All operations were performed by one of two experienced surgeons, who used a standardized technique and the same type of mesh and mesh-fixation materials. The severity of the patients’ pain was assessed preoperatively and at 2 weeks, 6 weeks and 3 months postoperatively by using a visual analogue scale (VAS). Quality of life (QoL) was evaluated by administering a standard health survey before and 3 months after surgery. Results in the three groups were compared. Results The AS, DC, and NS mesh-fixation groups had similar patient demographic, hernia and operative characteristics. There were no significant differences among the groups in VAS scores at any assessment time or in the change in VAS score from preoperative to postoperative evaluations. The QoL survey data showed a significant difference among groups for only two of the eight health areas analyzed. Conclusion In this trial, the three mesh-fixation methods were associated with similar postoperative pain and QoL findings. These results suggest that none of the techniques can be considered to have a pain-reduction advantage over the others. Development of new methods for securing the mesh may be required to decrease the rate or severity of pain after LVIHR.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Comparison of long-term outcome and quality of life after laparoscopic repair of incisional and ventral hernias with suture fixation with and without tacks: a prospective, randomized, controlled study.

            Technique of mesh fixation in laparoscopic incisional hernia repair is a matter of debate. Literature is lacking in randomized trials comparing various methods of mesh fixation. This study was designed to compare the cost-effectiveness and long-term outcomes following the two methods of mesh fixation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Chronic pain after open inguinal hernia surgery: suture fixation versus self-adhesive mesh repair.

              Chronic pain following inguinal hernia repair is a complex problem. Mesh fixation with sutures may be a contributing factor to this pain. The aim of this study was to compare the incidence of chronic pain and limitation of activities of daily living following inguinal hernia repair using a sutured mesh to a self-adhesive mesh, 6 months and 1 year following surgery. All consecutive patients presenting to NHS Fife for open hernia repair between January 2009 and January 2010 were included in our analysis. A prospective survey of postoperative pain and activities of daily living was conducted at 6 months and 1 year following hernia repair. Chronic pain was assessed using the SF-36 questionnaire. The primary end points for analysis were incidence of chronic pain and limitation of activities of daily living. Overall, 132 of 215 patients completed the questionnaire, 69 in the sutured group and 63 in the self-adhesive mesh group. The need for analgesics was similar during the first 24 h after surgery. Wound infections were detected in one patient in the Lichtenstein group and two in the second group. The incidence of chronic pain was 21 and 7.9% at 6 months and 18.8 and 6.3% at 1 year (p < 0.05). Moderate and vigorous activities were found to be limited some to all of the time in nine patients (60%) in the suture fixation group and in one patient in the self-adhesive group (20%, p < 0.02). Open inguinal hernia repair with a self-adhesive mesh may lead to less chronic pain and less restriction of activities of daily living than a sutured mesh fixation.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Pak J Med Sci
                Pak J Med Sci
                Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences
                Professional Medical Publications (Pakistan )
                1682-024X
                1681-715X
                Jan-Feb 2018
                : 34
                : 1
                : 175-178
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Dr. Noureen Shaukat, MBBS. Postgraduate Trainee, Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
                [2 ]Dr. Farhat Jaleel, MBBS, FCPS. Associate Professor, Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
                [3 ]Dr. Masood Jawaid, MBBS, MCPS, MRCS, FCPS, MHPE. Darul Sehat Hospital, Karachi, Pakistan
                [4 ]Dr. Imrana Zulfiqar, MBBS. Assistant Professor, Department of Surgery, Dow University of Health Sciences, Karachi, Pakistan
                Author notes
                Correspondence: Dr. Noureen Shaukat, MBBS, FCPS Trainee, Email: dr.naureen@ 123456outlook.com dr.naureen6@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                PJMS-34-175
                10.12669/pjms.341.13904
                5857007
                Copyright: © Pakistan Journal of Medical Sciences

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/3.0), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                Categories
                Original Article

                Comments

                Comment on this article