18
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Pricing of Staple Foods at Supermarkets versus Small Food Stores

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Prices affect food purchase decisions, particularly in lower-income communities, where access to a range of food retailers (including supermarkets) is limited. The aim of this study was to examine differences in staple food pricing between small urban food stores and the closest supermarkets, as well as whether pricing differentials varied based on proximity between small stores and larger retailers. In 2014, prices were measured for 15 staple foods during store visits in 140 smaller stores (corner stores, gas-marts, dollar stores, and pharmacies) in Minneapolis/St. Paul, MN and their closest supermarket. Mixed models controlling for store type were used to estimate the average price differential between: (a) smaller stores and supermarkets; (b) isolated smaller stores (>1 mile to closest supermarket) and non-isolated smaller stores; and (c) isolated smaller stores inside versus outside USDA-identified food deserts. On average, all items except white bread were 10–54% more expensive in smaller stores than in supermarkets ( p < 0.001). Prices were generally not significantly different in isolated stores compared with non-isolated stores for most items. Among isolated stores, there were no price differences inside versus outside food deserts. We conclude that smaller food stores have higher prices for most staple foods compared to their closest supermarket, regardless of proximity. More research is needed to examine staple food prices in different retail spaces.

          Related collections

          Most cited references48

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The impact of food prices on consumption: a systematic review of research on the price elasticity of demand for food.

          In light of proposals to improve diets by shifting food prices, it is important to understand how price changes affect demand for various foods. We reviewed 160 studies on the price elasticity of demand for major food categories to assess mean elasticities by food category and variations in estimates by study design. Price elasticities for foods and nonalcoholic beverages ranged from 0.27 to 0.81 (absolute values), with food away from home, soft drinks, juice, and meats being most responsive to price changes (0.7-0.8). As an example, a 10% increase in soft drink prices should reduce consumption by 8% to 10%. Studies estimating price effects on substitutions from unhealthy to healthy food and price responsiveness among at-risk populations are particularly needed.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Neighborhood characteristics associated with the location of food stores and food service places

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Neighborhood characteristics and availability of healthy foods in Baltimore.

              Differential access to healthy foods may contribute to racial and economic health disparities. The availability of healthy foods has rarely been directly measured in a systematic fashion. This study examines the associations among the availability of healthy foods and racial and income neighborhood composition. A cross-sectional study was conducted in 2006 to determine differences in the availability of healthy foods across 159 contiguous neighborhoods (census tracts) in Baltimore City and Baltimore County and in the 226 food stores within them. A healthy food availability index (HFAI) was determined for each store, using a validated instrument ranging from 0 points to 27 points. Neighborhood healthy food availability was summarized by the mean HFAI for the stores within the neighborhood. Descriptive analyses and multilevel models were used to examine associations of store type and neighborhood characteristics with healthy food availability. Forty-three percent of predominantly black neighborhoods and 46% of lower-income neighborhoods were in the lowest tertile of healthy food availability versus 4% and 13%, respectively, in predominantly white and higher-income neighborhoods (p<0.001). Mean differences in HFAI comparing predominantly black neighborhoods to white ones, and lower-income neighborhoods to higher-income neighborhoods, were -7.6 and -8.1, respectively. Supermarkets in predominantly black and lower-income neighborhoods had lower HFAI scores than supermarkets in predominantly white and higher-income neighborhoods (mean differences -3.7 and -4.9, respectively). Regression analyses showed that both store type and neighborhood characteristics were independently associated with the HFAI score. Predominantly black and lower-income neighborhoods have a lower availability of healthy foods than white and higher-income neighborhoods due to the differential placement of types of stores as well as differential offerings of healthy foods within similar stores. These differences may contribute to racial and economic health disparities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                Int J Environ Res Public Health
                ijerph
                International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
                MDPI
                1661-7827
                1660-4601
                15 August 2017
                August 2017
                : 14
                : 8
                : 915
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Department of Family Medicine and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA
                [2 ]Office of Statewide Health Improvement Initiatives, Minnesota Department of Health, St Paul, MN 55164, USA; Jennifer.Pelletier@ 123456state.mn.us
                [3 ]Division of Epidemiology and Community Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN 55455, USA; harna001@ 123456umn.edu (L.J.H.); erick232@ 123456umn.edu (D.J.E.); lenk@ 123456umn.edu (K.L.); nels5024@ 123456umn.edu (M.N.L.)
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: cecaspi@ 123456umn.edu ; Tel.: +1-612-626-7074
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3678-8322
                Article
                ijerph-14-00915
                10.3390/ijerph14080915
                5580618
                28809795
                08cd6bc1-8f5d-400b-9cce-55a447424759
                © 2017 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 20 June 2017
                : 12 August 2017
                Categories
                Article

                Public health
                corner stores,food affordability,food deserts,health disparities
                Public health
                corner stores, food affordability, food deserts, health disparities

                Comments

                Comment on this article