4
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Preoperative Psychological Evaluation for Patients Referred for Penile Prosthesis Implantation

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Patients may remain dissatisfied after penile prosthesis implantation for the treatment of erectile dysfunction. Studies showing the results of standardized protocols for preoperative psychological evaluation are lacking.

          Purpose

          To estimate the rate of patients considered psychologically unfit for penile prosthesis implantation and to compare their characteristics with those considered fit after the implementation of a standardized psychological profile evaluation protocol for men with erectile dysfunction.

          Methods

          Cross-sectional evaluation of men referred for penile prosthesis implantation by their urologists, based on organic causes for the erectile dysfunction, including a semi-structured (sexual and relational anamnesis of the patient and their partner, information about expectations about the results of the penile prosthesis implantation and possible complications) and a structured instrument including validated tools for the evaluation of depression and/or anxiety symptoms. These were the Self Reporting Questionnaire (SRQ-20), the 36-Item Short-Form Health Survey for quality of life, and the Five-Factor Model (FFM) for behavioral tendencies. After at least 3 interviews, the psychology team rated the patients as fit or unfit for surgery. Unfit patients were those with any of a set of warning signals indicating risk for dissatisfaction even after penile implantation.

          Main outcome measure

          The prevalence of patients considered “unfit for surgery.”

          Results

          The quality of life scores were good, but 27.6% of patients (95% confidence interval, CI: 16.7–40.9%) were unfit for surgery. Being unfit was associated with obesity ( P = .027), anxiety and/or depression symptoms ( P < .001) and high levels of neuroticism ( P = .001).

          Conclusion

          The preoperative evaluation protocol combining standardized and validated tools shows that more than one-quarter of patients with a medical indication for penile prosthesis implantation were not in good psychological conditions for the surgery. The development of psychological evaluation protocols can help identify patients in need of adequate care before penile implantation.

          M de Mello Ferreira dos Reis, EA Corrêa Barros, M Pollone, et al. Preoperative Psychological Evaluation for Patients Referred for Penile Prosthesis Implantation. Sex Med 2021;9:100311.

          Related collections

          Most cited references39

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The MOS 36-item short-form health survey (SF-36). I. Conceptual framework and item selection.

          A 36-item short-form (SF-36) was constructed to survey health status in the Medical Outcomes Study. The SF-36 was designed for use in clinical practice and research, health policy evaluations, and general population surveys. The SF-36 includes one multi-item scale that assesses eight health concepts: 1) limitations in physical activities because of health problems; 2) limitations in social activities because of physical or emotional problems; 3) limitations in usual role activities because of physical health problems; 4) bodily pain; 5) general mental health (psychological distress and well-being); 6) limitations in usual role activities because of emotional problems; 7) vitality (energy and fatigue); and 8) general health perceptions. The survey was constructed for self-administration by persons 14 years of age and older, and for administration by a trained interviewer in person or by telephone. The history of the development of the SF-36, the origin of specific items, and the logic underlying their selection are summarized. The content and features of the SF-36 are compared with the 20-item Medical Outcomes Study short-form.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Mental disorders in primary health care: a study of their frequency and diagnosis in four developing countries.

            1624 patients who were attending primary health facilities in 4 developing countries were examined to determine how many were suffering from mental disorder. Using stringent criteria to establish the presence of psychiatric morbidity, 225 cases were found, indicating an overall frequency of 13.9%. The great majority of cases were suffering from neurotic illnesses and for most the presenting complaint was of a physical symptom, such as headache, abdominal pain, cough or weakness. The health workers following their normal procedure correctly detected one third of the psychiatric cases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Influence of extraversion and neuroticism on subjective well-being: happy and unhappy people.

              Three studies are reported that examine the relations between personality and happiness or subjective well-being. It is argued that (a) one set of traits influences positive affect or satisfaction, whereas a different set of traits influences negative affect or dissatisfaction; (b) the former set of traits can be reviewed as components of extraversion, and the latter as components of neuroticism; and (c) personality differences antedate and predict differences in happiness over a period of 10 years, thus ruling out the rival hypothesis that temporary moods or states account for the observed relations. A model of individual differences in happiness is presented, and the separate and complementary roles of trait and adaptation-level theories in explaining happiness are discussed.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Sex Med
                Sex Med
                Sexual Medicine
                Elsevier
                2050-1161
                11 March 2021
                April 2021
                11 March 2021
                : 9
                : 2
                : 100311
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Psychologist, Coordinator of the Psychological Care, Sexual Medicine Outpatient Clinic, Urology Department, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André (SP), Brazil
                [2 ]Urologist, Director of the Sexual Medicine Outpatient Clinic, Urology Department, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André (SP), Brazil
                [3 ]Psychologist, Sexual Medicine Outpatient Clinic, Urology Department, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André (SP), Brazil
                [4 ]Urologist, Chief professor, Urology Department, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC, Santo André (SP), Brazil
                Author notes
                [] Corresponding Author: Margareth de Mello Ferreira dos Reis, Faculdade de Medicina do ABC – Disciplina de Urologia, Avenida Lauro Gomes, 2000 – CEP 09051-040, Santo André (SP), Brasil. Tel: +55 11 49935462 margarethreis@ 123456uol.com.br
                Article
                S2050-1161(20)30199-9 100311
                10.1016/j.esxm.2020.100311
                8072176
                33714883
                08d343e4-b9c6-4179-9392-14daca9baa13
                © 2021 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).

                History
                : 4 November 2020
                : 10 December 2020
                Categories
                Original Research
                Erectile Dysfunction

                erectile dysfunction,patient satisfaction,short-form health survey,self reporting questionnaire,neo-ffi-r,penile implantation

                Comments

                Comment on this article