19
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Disorders of representation and control in semantic cognition: Effects of familiarity, typicality, and specificity

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          We present a case-series comparison of patients with cross-modal semantic impairments consequent on either (a) bilateral anterior temporal lobe atrophy in semantic dementia (SD) or (b) left-hemisphere fronto-parietal and/or posterior temporal stroke in semantic aphasia (SA). Both groups were assessed on a new test battery designed to measure how performance is influenced by concept familiarity, typicality and specificity. In line with previous findings, performance in SD was strongly modulated by all of these factors, with better performance for more familiar items (regardless of typicality), for more typical items (regardless of familiarity) and for tasks that did not require very specific classification, consistent with the gradual degradation of conceptual knowledge in SD. The SA group showed significant impairments on all tasks but their sensitivity to familiarity, typicality and specificity was more variable and governed by task-specific effects of these factors on controlled semantic processing. The results are discussed with reference to theories about the complementary roles of representation and manipulation of semantic knowledge.

          Highlights

          • Case-series comparison of semantic dementia (SD) and semantic aphasia (SA).

          • Effects of concept familiarity, typicality and specificity across four tasks.

          • SD performance was better for familiar/typical items and less specific classification.

          • In SA, effects of these factors varied across tasks reflecting the control demands.

          • Data are consistent with interacting semantic representations and control processes.

          Related collections

          Most cited references54

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Role of left inferior prefrontal cortex in retrieval of semantic knowledge: a reevaluation.

          A number of neuroimaging findings have been interpreted as evidence that the left inferior frontal gyrus (IFG) subserves retrieval of semantic knowledge. We provide a fundamentally different interpretation, that it is not retrieval of semantic knowledge per se that is associated with left IFG activity but rather selection of information among competing alternatives from semantic memory. Selection demands were varied across three semantic tasks in a single group of subjects. Functional magnetic resonance imaging signal in overlapping regions of left IFG was dependent on selection demands in all three tasks. In addition, the degree of semantic processing was varied independently of selection demands in one of the tasks. The absence of left IFG activity for this comparison counters the argument that the effects of selection can be attributed solely to variations in degree of semantic retrieval. Our findings suggest that it is selection, not retrieval, of semantic knowledge that drives activity in the left IFG.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Coming of age: a review of embodiment and the neuroscience of semantics.

            Over the last decade, there has been an increasing body of work that explores whether sensory and motor information is a necessary part of semantic representation and processing. This is the embodiment hypothesis. This paper presents a theoretical review of this work that is intended to be useful for researchers in the neurosciences and neuropsychology. Beginning with a historical perspective, relevant theories are placed on a continuum from strongly embodied to completely unembodied representations. Predictions are derived and neuroscientific and neuropsychological evidence that could support different theories is reviewed; finally, criticisms of embodiment are discussed. We conclude that strongly embodied and completely disembodied theories are not supported, and that the remaining theories agree that semantic representation involves some form of convergence zones (Damasio, 1989) and the activation of modal content. For the future, research must carefully define the boundaries of semantic processing and tackle the representation of abstract entities. Copyright © 2010 Elsevier Srl. All rights reserved.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dissociable controlled retrieval and generalized selection mechanisms in ventrolateral prefrontal cortex.

              How does ventrolateral prefrontal cortex (VLPFC) control mnemonic processing? Alternative models propose that VLPFC guides top-down (controlled) retrieval of knowledge from long-term stores or selects goal-relevant products of retrieval from among competitors. A paucity of evidence supports a retrieval/selection distinction, raising the possibility that these models reduce to a common mechanism. Here, four manipulations varied semantic control demands during fMRI: judgment specificity, cue-target-associative strength, competitor dominance, and number of competitors. Factor analysis revealed evidence for a metafactor that accounted for common behavioral variance across manipulations and for functional variance in left mid-VLPFC. These data support a generalized control process that selects relevant knowledge from among competitors. By contrast, left anterior VLPFC and middle temporal cortex were sensitive to cue-target-associative strength, but not competition, consistent with a control process that retrieves knowledge stored in lateral temporal cortex. Distinct PFC mechanisms mediate top-down retrieval and postretrieval selection.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Neuropsychologia
                Pergamon Press
                0028-3932
                1873-3514
                1 September 2015
                September 2015
                : 76
                : 220-239
                Affiliations
                [a ]MRC Cognition & Brain Sciences Unit, Cambridge, UK
                [b ]Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, USA
                [c ]Department of Clinical Neurosciences, University of Cambridge, UK
                [d ]Department of Psychology, University of York, UK
                [e ]Neuroscience and Aphasia Research Unit, School of Psychological Sciences, University of Manchester, UK
                Author notes
                [* ]Corresponding author at: 524 WJ Brogden Hall, Department of Psychology, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI 53706, United States. Fax: +1 608 262 4279. ttrogers@ 123456wisc.edu
                Article
                S0028-3932(15)00161-X
                10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2015.04.015
                4582808
                25934635
                08e60141-171e-4e56-8b12-9e1f51e2297d
                © 2015 The Authors

                This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 1 October 2014
                : 14 April 2015
                : 16 April 2015
                Categories
                Article

                Neurology
                Neurology

                Comments

                Comment on this article