0
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Leadership for success in transforming medical abortion policy in Canada

      research-article
      1 , * , 1 , 2 , 3 , 4
      PLoS ONE
      Public Library of Science

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Mifepristone was approved for use in medical abortion by Health Canada in 2015. Approval was accompanied by regulations that prohibited pharmacist dispensing of the medication. Reproductive health advocates in Canada recognized this regulation would limit access to medical abortion and successfully worked to have this regulation removed in 2017. The purpose of this study was to assess the leadership involved in changing these regulations so that the success may be replicated by other groups advocating for health policy change.

          Methods

          This study involved a mixed methods instrumental design in the context of British Columbia, Canada. Our data collection included: a) interviews with seven key individuals, representing the organizations that worked in concert for change to Canadian mifepristone regulations, and b) document analysis of press articles, correspondence, briefing notes, and meeting minutes. We conducted a thematic analysis of transcripts of audio-recorded interviews. We identified strengths and weaknesses of the team dynamic using the Develop Coalitions, Achieve Results and Systems Transformation domains of the LEADS Framework.

          Results

          Our analysis of participant interviews indicates that autonomy, shared values, and clarity in communication were integral to the success of the group’s work. Analysis using the LEADS Framework showed that individuals possessed many of the capabilities identified as being necessary for successful health policy leadership. A lack of post-project assessment was identified as a possible limitation and could be incorporated in future work to strengthen dynamics especially when a desired outcome is not achieved. Document analysis provided a clear time-line of the work completed and suggested that strong communication between team members was another key to success.

          Conclusions

          The results of our analysis of the interviews and documents provide valuable insight into the workings of a successful group committed to a common goal. The existing collegial and trusting relationships between key stakeholders allowed for interdisciplinary collaboration, rapid mobilization, and identification of issues that facilitated successful Canadian global-first deregulation of mifepristone dispensing.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Medical Abortion.

          This guideline reviews the evidence relating to the provision of first-trimester medical induced abortion, including patient eligibility, counselling, and consent; evidence-based regimens; and special considerations for clinicians providing medical abortion care.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            Conflict Management: Difficult Conversations with Difficult People

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: found
              Is Open Access

              Ottawa Model of Implementation Leadership and Implementation Leadership Scale: mapping concepts for developing and evaluating theory-based leadership interventions

              Purpose Leadership in health care is instrumental to creating a supportive organizational environment and positive staff attitudes for implementing evidence-based practices to improve patient care and outcomes. The purpose of this study is to demonstrate the alignment of the Ottawa Model of Implementation Leadership (O-MILe), a theoretical model for developing implementation leadership, with the Implementation Leadership Scale (ILS), an empirically validated tool for measuring implementation leadership. A secondary objective is to describe the methodological process for aligning concepts of a theoretical model with an independently established measurement tool for evaluating theory-based interventions. Methods Modified template analysis was conducted to deductively map items of the ILS onto concepts of the O-MILe. An iterative process was used in which the model and scale developers (n=5) appraised the relevance, conceptual clarity, and fit of each ILS items with the O-MILe concepts through individual feedback and group discussions until consensus was reached. Results All 12 items of the ILS correspond to at least one O-MILe concept, demonstrating compatibility of the ILS as a measurement tool for the O-MILe theoretical constructs. Conclusion The O-MILe provides a theoretical basis for developing implementation leadership, and the ILS is a compatible tool for measuring leadership based on the O-MILe. Used together, the O-MILe and ILS provide an evidence- and theory-based approach for developing and measuring leadership for implementing evidence-based practices in health care. Template analysis offers a convenient approach for determining the compatibility of independently developed evaluation tools to test theoretical models.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Data curationRole: Formal analysisRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – original draftRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: Formal analysisRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: MethodologyRole: ResourcesRole: SupervisionRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS ONE
                plos
                plosone
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                8 January 2020
                2020
                : 15
                : 1
                : e0227216
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [2 ] Centre for Health Evaluation and Outcome Sciences (CHÉOS), Vancouver, Canada
                [3 ] Department of Family Practice, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, Canada
                [4 ] Faculty of Public Health & Policy, London School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, London, England
                University of the Western Cape, SOUTH AFRICA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0001-6186-939X
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-4340-7882
                Article
                PONE-D-19-22742
                10.1371/journal.pone.0227216
                6948737
                31914156
                08e7f1e8-c413-4699-9fc5-c551429fb200
                © 2020 Dineley et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 12 August 2019
                : 13 December 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 0, Pages: 16
                Funding
                Funded by: CIHR
                Award ID: PHE148161
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: funder-id http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100000245, Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research;
                Award ID: 16743
                Award Recipient :
                This study is supported by grants received by Wendy Norman from Canadian Institutes for Health Research, CIHR (PHE148161), in partnership with Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research (Award #16743). In kind and team infrastructure support was provided by the Women’s Health Research Institute of British Columbia Women’s Hospital and Health Centre of the Provincial Health Services Authority of British Columbia. SM is supported as a Trainee and a Scholar of the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research [16603, 18270]. WVN is supported as a Scholar of the Michael Smith Foundation for Health Research [2012-5139 (HSR)], and as an Applied Public Health Research Chair by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research [CPP-329455-107837]. The funders had no role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Research Article
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Women's Health
                Obstetrics and Gynecology
                Termination of Pregnancy
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Pharmacists
                People and Places
                Population Groupings
                Professions
                Medical Personnel
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Medical Doctors
                Physicians
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Pharmacology
                Drug Research and Development
                Drug Regulation
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Policy
                People and places
                Geographical locations
                North America
                Canada
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Providers
                Allied Health Care Professionals
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Policy
                Health Systems Strengthening
                Custom metadata
                All relevant data are within the paper.

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article