97
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Charting a dynamic DNA methylation landscape of the human genome

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          DNA methylation is a defining feature of mammalian cellular identity and essential for normal development 1, 2 . Most cell types, except germ cells and pre-implantation embryos 35 , display relatively stable DNA methylation patterns with 70–80% of all CpGs being methylated 6 . Despite recent advances we still have a too limited understanding of when, where and how many CpGs participate in genomic regulation. Here we report the in depth analysis of 42 whole genome bisulfite sequencing (WGBS) data sets across 30 diverse human cell and tissue types. We observe dynamic regulation for only 21.8% of autosomal CpGs within a normal developmental context, a majority of which are distal to transcription start sites. These dynamic CpGs co-localize with gene regulatory elements, particularly enhancers and transcription factor binding sites (TFBS), which allow identification of key lineage specific regulators. In addition, differentially methylated regions (DMRs) often harbor SNPs associated with cell type related diseases as determined by GWAS. The results also highlight the general inefficiency of WGBS as 70–80% of the sequencing reads across these data sets provided little or no relevant information regarding CpG methylation. To further demonstrate the utility of our DMR set, we use it to classify unknown samples and identify representative signature regions that recapitulate major DNA methylation dynamics. In summary, although in theory every CpG can change its methylation state, our results suggest that only a fraction does so as part of coordinated regulatory programs. Therefore our selected DMRs can serve as a starting point to help guide novel, more effective reduced representation approaches to capture the most informative fraction of CpGs as well as further pinpoint putative regulatory elements.

          Related collections

          Most cited references7

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Stability and flexibility of epigenetic gene regulation in mammalian development.

          Wolf Reik (2007)
          During development, cells start in a pluripotent state, from which they can differentiate into many cell types, and progressively develop a narrower potential. Their gene-expression programmes become more defined, restricted and, potentially, 'locked in'. Pluripotent stem cells express genes that encode a set of core transcription factors, while genes that are required later in development are repressed by histone marks, which confer short-term, and therefore flexible, epigenetic silencing. By contrast, the methylation of DNA confers long-term epigenetic silencing of particular sequences--transposons, imprinted genes and pluripotency-associated genes--in somatic cells. Long-term silencing can be reprogrammed by demethylation of DNA, and this process might involve DNA repair. It is not known whether any of the epigenetic marks has a primary role in determining cell and lineage commitment during development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Chromosome-wide and promoter-specific analyses identify sites of differential DNA methylation in normal and transformed human cells.

            Cytosine methylation is required for mammalian development and is often perturbed in human cancer. To determine how this epigenetic modification is distributed in the genomes of primary and transformed cells, we used an immunocapturing approach followed by DNA microarray analysis to generate methylation profiles of all human chromosomes at 80-kb resolution and for a large set of CpG islands. In primary cells we identified broad genomic regions of differential methylation with higher levels in gene-rich neighborhoods. Female and male cells had indistinguishable profiles for autosomes but differences on the X chromosome. The inactive X chromosome (Xi) was hypermethylated at only a subset of gene-rich regions and, unexpectedly, overall hypomethylated relative to its active counterpart. The chromosomal methylation profile of transformed cells was similar to that of primary cells. Nevertheless, we detected large genomic segments with hypomethylation in the transformed cell residing in gene-poor areas. Furthermore, analysis of 6,000 CpG islands showed that only a small set of promoters was methylated differentially, suggesting that aberrant methylation of CpG island promoters in malignancy might be less frequent than previously hypothesized.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The DNA methyltransferases of mammals.

              T Bestor (2000)
              The biological significance of 5-methylcytosine was in doubt for many years, but is no longer. Through targeted mutagenesis in mice it has been learnt that every protein shown by biochemical tests to be involved in the establishment, maintenance or interpretation of genomic methylation patterns is encoded by an essential gene. A human genetic disorder (ICF syndrome) has recently been shown to be caused by mutations in the DNA methyltransferase 3B (DNMT3B) gene. A second human disorder (Rett syndrome) has been found to result from mutations in the MECP2 gene, which encodes a protein that binds to methylated DNA. Global genome demethylation caused by targeted mutations in the DNA methyltransferase-1 (Dnmt1) gene has shown that cytosine methylation plays essential roles in X-inactivation, genomic imprinting and genome stabilization. The majority of genomic 5-methylcytosine is now known to enforce the transcriptional silence of the enormous burden of transposons and retroviruses that have accumulated in the mammalian genome. It has also become clear that programmed changes in methylation patterns are less important in the regulation of mammalian development than was previously believed. Although a number of outstanding questions have yet to be answered (one of these questions involves the nature of the cues that designate sites for methylation at particular stages of gametogenesis and early development), studies of DNA methyltransferases are likely to provide further insights into the biological functions of genomic methylation patterns.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                0410462
                6011
                Nature
                Nature
                Nature
                0028-0836
                1476-4687
                16 August 2013
                07 August 2013
                22 August 2013
                22 February 2014
                : 500
                : 7463
                : 10.1038/nature12433
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Broad Institute of MIT and Harvard, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02142, USA
                [2 ]Harvard Stem Cell Institute, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
                [3 ]Department of Stem Cell and Regenerative Biology, Harvard University, Cambridge, Massachusetts 02138, USA
                [5 ]Division of Endocrinology, Beth Israel Deaconess Medical Center, Boston, MA 02215
                [6 ]Applied Bioinformatics, Center for Bioinformatics and Quantitative Biology Center, University of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany
                [7 ]Program in Translational NeuroPsychiatric Genomics, Institute for the Neurosciences, Departments of Neurology and Psychiatry, Brigham and Women’s Hospital, 77 Avenue Louis Pasteur, NRB168, Boston, MA 02115
                [8 ]Rush Alzheimer’s Disease Center, Rush University Medical Center, 600 S Paulina St., Chicago, IL 60612
                [9 ]Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, 185 Cambridge St., Boston, MA 02114
                Author notes
                Correspondence and requests for materials should be addressed to A.M. ( alexander_meissner@ 123456harvard.edu )
                [4]

                Present Address: Max Planck Institute for Informatics, 66123 Saarbrücken, Germany

                Article
                NIHMS502498
                10.1038/nature12433
                3821869
                23925113
                08fb9601-9b5d-4f35-b087-eb23641a6a72

                Users may view, print, copy, download and text and data- mine the content in such documents, for the purposes of academic research, subject always to the full Conditions of use: http://www.nature.com/authors/editorial_policies/license.html#terms

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences : NIEHS
                Award ID: U01 ES017155 || ES
                Funded by: National Institute of General Medical Sciences : NIGMS
                Award ID: P01 GM099117 || GM
                Categories
                Article

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article