43
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares

          The flagship journal of the Society for Endocrinology. Learn more

      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found

      Fifteen years of GH replacement increases bone mineral density in hypopituitary patients with adult-onset GH deficiency

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          Few studies have determined the effects of more than 5–10 years of GH replacement in adults on bone mineral content (BMC) and bone mineral density (BMD).

          Design/patients

          In this prospective, single-centre, open-label study, the effects of 15 years of GH replacement on BMC and BMD, measured using dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry, were determined in 126 hypopituitary adults (72 men) with adult-onset GH deficiency (GHD). Mean age was 49.4 (range 22–74) years at the initiation of the study.

          Results

          The mean initial GH dose of 0.63 ( s.e.m. 0.03) mg/day was gradually lowered to 0.41 (0.01) mg/day after 15 years. The mean serum IGF1 SDS increased from −1.69 (0.11) at baseline to 0.63 (0.16) at the study end ( P<0.001 vs baseline). The 15 years of GH replacement induced a sustained increase in total body BMC (+5%, P<0.001) and BMD (+2%, P<0.001). Lumbar (L2–L4) spine BMC increased by 9% ( P<0.001) and BMD by 5% ( P<0.001). In femur neck, a peak increase in BMC and BMD of 7 and 3%, respectively, was observed after 7 years (both P<0.001). After 15 years, femur neck BMC was 5% above the baseline value ( P<0.01), whereas femur neck BMD had returned to the baseline level. In most variables, men had a more marked response to GH replacement than women.

          Conclusions

          Fifteen-year GH replacement in GHD adults induced a sustained increase in total body and lumbar (L2–L4) spine BMC and BMD. In femur neck, BMC and BMD peaked at 7 years and then decreased towards baseline values.

          Related collections

          Most cited references31

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Diagnosis of osteoporosis and assessment of fracture risk.

          John Kanis (2002)
          The diagnosis of osteoporosis centres on the assessment of bone mineral density (BMD). Osteoporosis is defined as a BMD 2.5 SD or more below the average value for premenopausal women (T score < -2.5 SD). Severe osteoporosis denotes osteoporosis in the presence of one or more fragility fractures. The same absolute value for BMD used in women can be used in men. The recommended site for diagnosis is the proximal femur with dual energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA). Other sites and validated techniques, however, can be used for fracture prediction. Although hip fracture prediction with BMD alone is at least as good as blood pressure readings to predict stroke, the predictive value of BMD can be enhanced by use of other factors, such as biochemical indices of bone resorption and clinical risk factors. Clinical risk factors that contribute to fracture risk independently of BMD include age, previous fragility fracture, premature menopause, a family history of hip fracture, and the use of oral corticosteroids. In the absence of validated population screening strategies, a case finding strategy is recommended based on the finding of risk factors. Treatment should be considered in individuals subsequently shown to have a high fracture risk. Because of the many techniques available for fracture risk assessment, the 10-year probability of fracture is the desirable measurement to determine intervention thresholds. Many treatments can be provided cost-effectively to men and women if hip fracture probability over 10 years ranges from 2% to 10% dependent on age.
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry for total-body and regional bone-mineral and soft-tissue composition.

            Bone mineral density (BMD) and soft-tissue composition of the total body and major subregions were measured with dual-energy x-ray absorptiometry (DEXA). Total body scans were made in 12 young adults (6 male, 6 female) on five occasions at both a medium speed (20 min) and a fast speed (10 min). There were no significant differences in mean results or in precision errors between the two speeds. The precision errors (1 SD) for total body BMD, percent fat in soft tissue (% Fat), fat mass, and lean tissue mass were less than 0.01 g/cm2, 1.4%, 1.0 kg, and 0.8 kg, respectively. These results corresponded to a relative error of 0.8% for total body BMD and 1.5% for lean body mass. Regional BMD and soft-tissue values (arms, legs, trunk) were determined with slightly higher precision errors. Skeletal mineral was 5.8 +/- 0.5% of lean tissue mass (r = 0.96, p less than 0.001). DEXA provides precise composition analysis with a low radiation exposure (less than 0.1 microGy).
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Growth hormone and bone.

              It is well known that GH is important in the regulation of longitudinal bone growth. Its role in the regulation of bone metabolism in man has not been understood until recently. Several in vivo and in vitro studies have demonstrated that GH is important in the regulation of both bone formation and bone resorption. In Figure 9 a simplified model for the cellular effects of GH in the regulation of bone remodeling is presented (Fig. 9). GH increases bone formation in two ways: via a direct interaction with GHRs on osteoblasts and via an induction of endocrine and autocrine/paracrine IGF-I. It is difficult to say how much of the GH effect is mediated by IGFs and how much is IGF-independent. GH treatment also results in increased bone resorption. It is still unknown whether osteoclasts express functional GHRs, but recent in vitro studies indicate that GH regulates osteoclast formation in bone marrow cultures. Possible modulations of the GH/IGF axis by glucocorticoids and estrogens are also included in Fig. 9. GH deficiency results in a decreased bone mass in both man and experimental animals. Long-term treatment (> 18 months) of GHD patients with GH results in an increased bone mass. GH treatment also increases bone mass and the total mechanical strength of bones in rats with a normal GH secretion. Recent clinical studies demonstrate that GH treatment of patients with normal GH secretion increases biochemical markers for both bone formation and bone resorption. Because of the short duration of GH treatment in man with normal GH secretion, the effect on bone mass is still inconclusive. Interestingly, GH treatment to GHD adults initially results in increased bone resorption with an increased number of bone-remodeling units and more newly produced unmineralized bone, resulting in an apparent low or unchanged bone mass. However, GH treatment for more than 18 months gives increased bone formation and bone mineralization of newly produced bone and a concomitant increase in bone mass as determined with DEXA. Thus, the action of GH on bone metabolism in GHD adults is 2-fold: it stimulates both bone resorption and bone formation. We therefore propose "the biphasic model" of GH action in bone remodeling (Fig. 10). According to this model, GH initially increases bone resorption with a concomitant bone loss that is followed by a phase of increased bone formation. After the moment when bone formation is stimulated more than bone resorption (transition point), bone mass is increased. However, a net gain of bone mass caused by GH may take some time as the initial decrease in bone mass must first be replaced (Fig. 10). When all clinical studies of GH treatment of GHD adults are taken into account, it appears that the "transition point" occurs after approximately 6 months and that a net increase of bone mass will be seen after 12-18 months of GH treatment. It should be emphasized that the biphasic model of GH action in bone remodeling is based on findings in GHD adults. It remains to be clarified whether or not it is valid for subjects with normal GH secretion. A treatment intended to increase the effects of GH/IGF-I axis on bone metabolism might include: 1) GH, 2) IGF, 3) other hormones/factors increasing the local IGF-I production in bone, and 4) GH-releasing factors. Other hormones/growth factors increasing local IGF may be important but are not discussed in this article. IGF-I has been shown to increase bone mass in animal models and biochemical markers in humans. However, no effect on bone mass has yet been presented in humans. Because the financial cost for GH treatment is high it has been suggested that GH-releasing factors might be used to stimulate the GH/IGF-I axis. The advantage of GH-releasing factors over GH is that some of them can be administered orally and that they may induce a more physiological GH secretion. (ABSTRACT TRUNCATED)

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Eur J Endocrinol
                Eur. J. Endocrinol
                EJE
                European Journal of Endocrinology
                BioScientifica (Bristol )
                0804-4643
                1479-683X
                May 2012
                : 166
                : 5
                : 787-795
                Affiliations
                [1]simpleDepartment of Endocrinology simpleInstitute of Medicine, Sahlgrenska Academy, Sahlgrenska University Hospital, University of Gothenburg Gröna Stråket 8, SE-413 45, GöteborgSweden
                [1 ]simpleDepartment of Clinical Nutrition simpleSahlgrenska University Hospital SE-413 45, GöteborgSweden
                Author notes
                (Correspondence should be addressed to M Elbornsson; Email: mariam.elbornsson@ 123456medic.gu.se )
                Article
                EJE111072
                10.1530/EJE-11-1072
                3341655
                22318746
                09078fec-b660-4900-84aa-2bbc76d588ae
                © 2012 European Society of Endocrinology

                This is an Open Access article distributed under the terms of the European Journal of Endocrinology's Re-use Licence which permits unrestricted non-commercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 15 December 2011
                : 29 January 2012
                : 8 February 2012
                Funding
                Funded by: Swedish Research Council
                Categories
                Clinical Study

                Endocrinology & Diabetes
                Endocrinology & Diabetes

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                Related Documents Log