29
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Interactive apps prevent gender discrepancies in early‐grade mathematics in a low‐income country in sub‐Sahara Africa

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Globally, gender differences are reported in the early acquisition of reading and mathematics as girls tend to outperform boys in reading, whereas boys tend to outperform girls in mathematics. This can have long‐term impact resulting in an under‐representation of girls in Science, Technology, Engineering and Mathematics subjects. Recent research suggests that sociocultural factors account for differences across genders in the acquisition of these foundational skills. In this study, we investigated whether a new technology‐based intervention, that included activities accessible to both boys and girls, can reduce gender differences from emerging during the early primary school years. The novel instructional method used in this study employed apps developed by onebillion© delivered individually through touch‐screen tablets. Over a series of experiments conducted in Malawi, a low‐income country in sub‐Sahara Africa, we found that when children were exposed to standard pedagogical practice typical gender differences emerged over the first grade (Experiment 1). In contrast, boys and girls learnt equally well with the new interactive apps designed to support the learning of mathematics (Experiment 2) and reading (Experiment 3). When implemented at the start of primary education, before significant gender discrepancies become established, this novel technology‐based intervention can prevent significant gender effects for mathematics. These results demonstrate that different instructional practices influence the emergence of gender disparities in early mathematics. Digital interventions can mitigate gender differences in countries where standard pedagogical instruction typically hinders girls from acquiring early mathematical skills at the same rate as boys.

          A video abstract of this article can be viewed at https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=55x-6hhAY9M&feature=youtu.be

          Related collections

          Most cited references27

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          The Science of Sex Differences in Science and Mathematics.

          Amid ongoing public speculation about the reasons for sex differences in careers in science and mathematics, we present a consensus statement that is based on the best available scientific evidence. Sex differences in science and math achievement and ability are smaller for the mid-range of the abilities distribution than they are for those with the highest levels of achievement and ability. Males are more variable on most measures of quantitative and visuospatial ability, which necessarily results in more males at both high- and low-ability extremes; the reasons why males are often more variable remain elusive. Successful careers in math and science require many types of cognitive abilities. Females tend to excel in verbal abilities, with large differences between females and males found when assessments include writing samples. High-level achievement in science and math requires the ability to communicate effectively and comprehend abstract ideas, so the female advantage in writing should be helpful in all academic domains. Males outperform females on most measures of visuospatial abilities, which have been implicated as contributing to sex differences on standardized exams in mathematics and science. An evolutionary account of sex differences in mathematics and science supports the conclusion that, although sex differences in math and science performance have not directly evolved, they could be indirectly related to differences in interests and specific brain and cognitive systems. We review the brain basis for sex differences in science and mathematics, describe consistent effects, and identify numerous possible correlates. Experience alters brain structures and functioning, so causal statements about brain differences and success in math and science are circular. A wide range of sociocultural forces contribute to sex differences in mathematics and science achievement and ability-including the effects of family, neighborhood, peer, and school influences; training and experience; and cultural practices. We conclude that early experience, biological factors, educational policy, and cultural context affect the number of women and men who pursue advanced study in science and math and that these effects add and interact in complex ways. There are no single or simple answers to the complex questions about sex differences in science and mathematics.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Why are some STEM fields more gender balanced than others?

            Women obtain more than half of U.S. undergraduate degrees in biology, chemistry, and mathematics, yet they earn less than 20% of computer science, engineering, and physics undergraduate degrees (National Science Foundation, 2014a). Gender differences in interest in computer science, engineering, and physics appear even before college. Why are women represented in some science, technology, engineering, and mathematics (STEM) fields more than others? We conduct a critical review of the most commonly cited factors explaining gender disparities in STEM participation and investigate whether these factors explain differential gender participation across STEM fields. Math performance and discrimination influence who enters STEM, but there is little evidence to date that these factors explain why women's underrepresentation is relatively worse in some STEM fields. We introduce a model with three overarching factors to explain the larger gender gaps in participation in computer science, engineering, and physics than in biology, chemistry, and mathematics: (a) masculine cultures that signal a lower sense of belonging to women than men, (b) a lack of sufficient early experience with computer science, engineering, and physics, and (c) gender gaps in self-efficacy. Efforts to increase women's participation in computer science, engineering, and physics may benefit from changing masculine cultures and providing students with early experiences that signal equally to both girls and boys that they belong and can succeed in these fields. (PsycINFO Database Record
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              The effects of integrating mobile devices with teaching and learning on students' learning performance: A meta-analysis and research synthesis

                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                nicola.pitchford@nottingham.ac.uk
                Journal
                Dev Sci
                Dev Sci
                10.1111/(ISSN)1467-7687
                DESC
                Developmental Science
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                1363-755X
                1467-7687
                23 June 2019
                September 2019
                : 22
                : 5 , Global Child Development ( doiID: 10.1111/desc.v22.5 )
                : e12864
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] School of Psychology University of Nottingham Nottingham UK
                [ 2 ] Chancellor College University of Malawi Zomba Malawi
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Nicola Pitchford, School of Psychology, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, NG7 2RD, UK.

                Email: nicola.pitchford@ 123456nottingham.ac.uk

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5193-8371
                Article
                DESC12864
                10.1111/desc.12864
                6771718
                31120168
                0926ac2b-947c-4abb-823c-2958b9a84244
                © 2019 The Authors. Developmental Science Published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 29 April 2018
                : 10 May 2019
                : 14 May 2019
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 5, Pages: 14, Words: 10717
                Funding
                Funded by: Voluntary Service Overseas
                Award ID: MWI-14/0019
                Categories
                Special Issue Article
                Special Issue Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                desc12864
                September 2019
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.6.9 mode:remove_FC converted:01.10.2019

                Developmental biology
                education,gender inequity,mathematics,reading,tablet technology
                Developmental biology
                education, gender inequity, mathematics, reading, tablet technology

                Comments

                Comment on this article

                scite_

                Similar content15

                Cited by10

                Most referenced authors228