3
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Usability of augmented reality technology in tele-mentorship for managing clinical scenarios—A study protocol

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Tele-mentorship is considered to offer a solution to training and providing professional assistance at a distance. Tele-mentoring is a method in which a mentor interactively guides a mentee at a different geographic location in real time using a technological communication device. During a healthcare procedure, tele-mentoring can support a medical expert, remote from the treatment site, to guide a less-experienced practitioner at a different geographic location. Augmented Reality (AR) technology has been incorporated in tele-mentoring systems in healthcare environments globally. However, evidence is absent about the usability of AR technology in tele-mentoring clinical healthcare professionals in managing clinical scenarios.

          Aim

          This study aims to evaluate the usability of Augmented Reality (AR) technology in tele-mentorship for managing clinical scenarios.

          Methods

          This study uses a quasi-experimental design. Four experienced health professionals and a minimum of twelve novice health practitioners will be recruited for the roles of mentors and mentees, respectively. In the experiment, each mentee wearing the AR headset performs a maximum of four different clinical scenarios in a simulated learning environment. A mentor who stays in a separate room and uses a laptop will provide the mentee remote instruction and guidance following the standard protocols for the treatment proposed for each scenario. The scenarios of Acute Coronary Syndrome, Acute Myocardial Infarction, Pneumonia Severe Reaction to Antibiotics, and Hypoglycaemic Emergency are selected, and the corresponding clinical management protocols developed. Outcome measures include the mentors and mentees’ perception of the AR’s usability, mentorship effectiveness, and the mentees’ self-confidence and skill performance.

          Ethics

          The protocol was approved by the Tasmania Health and Medical Human Research Ethics Committee (Project ID: 23343). The complete pre-registration of our study can be found at https://osf.io/q8c3u/.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          An Empirical Evaluation of the System Usability Scale

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            A Survey of Augmented Reality

              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Measuring the effectiveness of faculty mentoring relationships.

              "Mentor" is a term widely used in academic medicine but for which there is no consensus on an operational definition. Further, criteria are rarely reported for evaluating the effectiveness of mentoring. This article presents the work of an Ad Hoc Faculty Mentoring Committee whose tasks were to define "mentorship," specify concrete characteristics and responsibilities of mentors that are measurable, and develop new tools to evaluate the effectiveness of the mentoring relationship. The committee developed two tools: the Mentorship Profile Questionnaire, which describes the characteristics and outcome measures of the mentoring relationship from the perspective of the mentee, and the Mentorship Effectiveness Scale, a 12-item six-point agree-disagree-format Likert-type rating scale, which evaluates 12 behavioral characteristics of the mentor. These instruments are explained and copies are provided. Psychometric issues, including the importance of content-related validity evidence, response bias due to acquiescence and halo effects, and limitations on collecting reliability evidence, are examined in the context of the mentor-mentee relationship. Directions for future research are suggested.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Role: ConceptualizationRole: InvestigationRole: MethodologyRole: Project administrationRole: SoftwareRole: VisualizationRole: Writing – original draft
                Role: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: SupervisionRole: ValidationRole: Writing – review & editing
                Role: Editor
                Journal
                PLoS One
                PLoS One
                plos
                PLoS ONE
                Public Library of Science (San Francisco, CA USA )
                1932-6203
                31 March 2022
                2022
                : 17
                : 3
                : e0266255
                Affiliations
                [1 ] Centre for Rural Health, School of Health Sciences, College of Health and Medicine, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
                [2 ] Human Interface Technology Laboratory, School of Information and Communications Technology, University of Tasmania, Launceston, Tasmania, Australia
                Illawarra Shoalhaven Local Health District, AUSTRALIA
                Author notes

                Competing Interests: The authors have declared that no competing interests exist.

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-9907-8240
                Article
                PONE-D-22-04739
                10.1371/journal.pone.0266255
                8970358
                35358249
                09280498-f863-4ff8-b970-492599c8c0b6
                © 2022 Bui et al

                This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author and source are credited.

                History
                : 16 February 2022
                : 11 March 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 3, Tables: 1, Pages: 11
                Funding
                Funded by: Department of Health, Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training Program
                Funded by: University of Tasmania Research Scholarship
                The authors acknowledge the support received from the University of Tasmania and the Commonwealth Government Department of Health Rural Health Multidisciplinary Training program. The funders had and will not have a role in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish, or preparation of the manuscript.
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Facilities
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Bioengineering
                Biotechnology
                Medical Devices and Equipment
                Engineering and Technology
                Bioengineering
                Biotechnology
                Medical Devices and Equipment
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Medical Devices and Equipment
                Engineering and Technology
                Telecommunications
                Engineering and Technology
                Measurement
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Psychometrics
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Health Care
                Health Care Policy
                Treatment Guidelines
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Cognitive Science
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Social Sciences
                Psychology
                Cognitive Psychology
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Biology and Life Sciences
                Neuroscience
                Learning and Memory
                Learning
                Human Learning
                Medicine and Health Sciences
                Critical Care and Emergency Medicine

                Uncategorized
                Uncategorized

                Comments

                Comment on this article