8
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Combination therapy in hypertension: new recommendations

      research-article
      Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
      Clinics Cardive Publishing

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction The recent publication of the American Hypertension Society (ASH) position paper on combination therapy in the treatment of hypertension is essential reading for all physicians and for South African medical aid funders.1 As all agree that the goal of antihypertensive therapy is to reduce the risk of vascular events, it is essential that effective and easy-to-use antihypertensives with outcomes data be used early in therapy. Available data from clinical trials and meta-analyses have shown that at least 75% of patients will require combination therapy to achieve contemporary targets. The increasing prevalence of obesity, the metabolic syndrome and type 2 diabetes is likely to increase this percentage even higher, the position paper notes. When choosing combination therapy, the position paper points to the physician making a deliberate choice as to which combination for which patient. The physician needs to consider efficacy, tolerability and adherence aspects when prescribing combination therapy. In efficacy terms, rational combination therapy is based on evidence that the combination lowers blood pressure more significantly than its individual components. The blood pressure reduction should be smooth and continuous, meeting pharmacokinetic criteria for once-a-day usage. Dose-dependent effects of the combination should be less than those induced by higher dosage of the monotherapy. Funders need to take note that co-payment by the medical aid member will reduce compliance and reduce the protective effect of the antihypertensive medication on future vascular events. The ASH position paper identifies twodrug combinations that meet the three criteria outlined above (a single pill with three or more drugs were not reviewed) and these are regarded as preferred combinations. Others that have less evidence to support efficacy, safety or tolerance are also identified. RAAS inhibitor and diuretic This combination is classified as preferred, whether an ACE inhibitor or an angiotensin receptor blocker (ARB), is used with a low-dose diuretic. Most combinations contain hydrochlorothiazide, but chlorthalidone is also identified as the most-used diuretics in US outcomes trials, although combinations with this diuretic are not currently available. RAAS inhibitor and calclum channel blocker The combination of an ACE inhibitor or ARB with a calcium channel blocker (CCB) results in fully additive blood pressure reduction and improves tolerability. The ACCOMPLISH trial2 (Avoiding Cardiovascular events through COMbination therapy in patients living with Systolic Hypertension) showed beneficial cardiovascular outcomes of this ACE inhibitor/CCB combination compared with the ACE inhibitor/diuretic. Most of the patients in this trial were diabetic, with evidence of underlying ischaemic disease. The position paper considers ARB/CCB combinations equivalent to ACE inhibitor/ CCB combinations Renin inhibitor and ARBs This combination, although without outcome data, has achieved partially additive blood pressure reduction and is well tolerated. In a study of maximum approved doses of valsartan and aliskiren,3 a 30% additional blood pressure response was seen compared to monotherapy. The sideeffect profile matched that of placebo. CCB and diuretics This combination also results in partially additive blood pressure reduction and performed well in outcome studies.4 It is classified in the position paper as acceptable, perhaps because it does not meet the criteria of reduced side-effect profile of the combination compared to the individual drugs. β-blockers and diuretics The position paper notes that there is evidence, mainly with the first-generation β-blocker, atenolol, that β-blockers are less effective than diuretics, ACE inhibitors, ARBs and CCBs. β-blockers attenuate the RAAS activation that accompanies the use of thiazide diuretics, and their combination results in fully additive blood pressure reduction. Addition of the diuretic improves the efficacy of β-blockers in black patientsand others with low-renin hypertension.5 These combinations are classed as acceptable with known side effects, such as increased risk of glucose intolerance, fatigue and sexual dysfunction. Thiazide diuretics and potassiumsparing diuretics The use of spironolactone/HCTZ in obese patients is especially noted, as is the fact that the combination should be used only in people with relatively well-preserved kidney function (eGFR > 50 ml/min). CCBs and β-blockers The pharmacological effects of these two drug classes are complementary and result in additive blood-pressure reduction. The combination should be with a dihydropyridine CCB and not a non-dihydropyridine CCB such as verapamil or diltiazen because of their additive effects on heart rate and A–V conduction. This position paper places ACE inhibitors and ARBs, RAAS inhibitors and β-blockers, and the combination of β-blockers and centrally acting agents in the category of lower efficacy. It concludes that early use of a combination reduces counter-regulatory responses of monotherapy and brings blood pressure to target in a shorter period of time.

          Related collections

          Most cited references3

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Efficacy and safety of combined use of aliskiren and valsartan in patients with hypertension: a randomised, double-blind trial.

          The aim of this study was to assess dual renin system intervention with the maximum recommended doses of aliskiren and valsartan, compared with each drug alone in patients with hypertension. In this double-blind study, 1797 patients with hypertension (mean sitting diastolic blood pressure 95-109 mm Hg and 8-h daytime ambulatory diastolic blood pressure > or =90 mm Hg) were randomly assigned to receive once-daily aliskiren 150 mg (n=437), valsartan 160 mg (455), a combination of aliskiren 150 mg and valsartan 160 mg (446), or placebo (459) for 4 weeks, followed by forced titration to double the dose to the maximum recommended dose for another 4 weeks. The primary endpoint was change in mean sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline to week 8 endpoint. Analyses were done by intention to treat. This trial is registered at ClinicalTrials.gov with the number NCT00219180. 196 (11%) patients discontinued study treatment before the end of the trial (63 in the placebo group, 53 in the aliskiren group, 43 in the valsartan group, and 37 in the aliskiren/valsartan group), mainly due to lack of therapeutic effect. At week 8 endpoint, the combination of aliskiren 300 mg and valsartan 320 mg lowered mean sitting diastolic blood pressure from baseline by 12.2 mm Hg, significantly more than either monotherapy (aliskiren 300 mg 9.0 mm Hg decrease, p<0.0001; valsartan 320 mg, 9.7 mm Hg decrease, p<0.0001), or with placebo (4.1 mm Hg decrease, p<0.0001). Rates of adverse events and laboratory abnormalities were similar in all groups. The combination of aliskiren and valsartan at maximum recommended doses provides significantly greater reductions in blood pressure than does monotherapy with either agent in patients with hypertension, with a tolerability profile similar to that with aliskiren and valsartan alone.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Combination therapy in hypertension.

            The goal of antihypertensive therapy is to abolish the risks associated with blood pressure (BP) elevation without adversely affecting quality of life. Drug selection is based on efficacy in lowering BP and in reducing cardiovascular (CV) end points including stroke, myocardial infarction, and heart failure. Although the choice of initial drug therapy exerts some effect on long-term outcomes, it is evident that BP reduction per se is the primary determinant of CV risk reduction. Available data suggest that at least 75% of patients will require combination therapy to achieve contemporary BP targets, and increasing emphasis is being placed on the practical tasks involved in consistently achieving and maintaining goal BP in clinical practice. It is within this context that the American Society of Hypertension presents this Position Paper on Combination Therapy for Hypertension. It will address the scientific basis of combination therapy, present the pharmacologic rationale for choosing specific drug combinations, and review patient selection criteria for initial and secondary use. The advantages and disadvantages of single pill (fixed) drug combinations, and the implications of recent clinical trials involving specific combination strategies will also be discussed.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: not found
              • Article: not found

              In: Isso Jl (jun), Black HR, Sica DA, eds.

              (2008)
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Cardiovasc J Afr
                Cardiovasc J Afr
                TBC
                Cardiovascular Journal of Africa
                Clinics Cardive Publishing
                1995-1892
                1680-0745
                April 2010
                : 21
                : 2
                : 120
                Affiliations
                Special Assignments Editor
                Article
                5566086
                20532442
                09529eed-299f-4e5c-9d54-719559f21ee9
                Copyright © 2015 Clinics Cardive Publishing

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                Categories
                Case Study

                Comments

                Comment on this article