15
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Dose‐finding methods for Phase I clinical trials using pharmacokinetics in small populations

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The aim of phase I clinical trials is to obtain reliable information on safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics (PK), and mechanism of action of drugs with the objective of determining the maximum tolerated dose (MTD). In most phase I studies, dose‐finding and PK analysis are done separately and no attempt is made to combine them during dose allocation. In cases such as rare diseases, paediatrics, and studies in a biomarker‐defined subgroup of a defined population, the available population size will limit the number of possible clinical trials that can be conducted. Combining dose‐finding and PK analyses to allow better estimation of the dose‐toxicity curve should then be considered. In this work, we propose, study, and compare methods to incorporate PK measures in the dose allocation process during a phase I clinical trial. These methods do this in different ways, including using PK observations as a covariate, as the dependent variable or in a hierarchical model. We conducted a large simulation study that showed that adding PK measurements as a covariate only does not improve the efficiency of dose‐finding trials either in terms of the number of observed dose limiting toxicities or the probability of correct dose selection. However, incorporating PK measures does allow better estimation of the dose‐toxicity curve while maintaining the performance in terms of MTD selection compared to dose‐finding designs that do not incorporate PK information. In conclusion, using PK information in the dose allocation process enriches the knowledge of the dose‐toxicity relationship, facilitating better dose recommendation for subsequent trials.

          Related collections

          Most cited references17

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found
          Is Open Access

          Basic Concepts in Population Modeling, Simulation, and Model-Based Drug Development

          Modeling is an important tool in drug development; population modeling is a complex process requiring robust underlying procedures for ensuring clean data, appropriate computing platforms, adequate resources, and effective communication. Although requiring an investment in resources, it can save time and money by providing a platform for integrating all information gathered on new therapeutic agents. This article provides a brief overview of aspects of modeling and simulation as applied to many areas in drug development.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Phase I pharmacokinetic study of S-1 plus cisplatin in patients with advanced gastric carcinoma.

            The conversion rate of tegafur (a component of S-1) to fluorouracil (FU) differs in Asians and whites because of polymorphic differences in the CYP2A6 gene. S-1 with cisplatin is considered highly active in Japanese gastric cancer patients. Therefore, we initiated a phase I pharmacokinetic study of this combination in our gastric cancer patients. Patients received cisplatin intravenously on day 1 and S-1 orally, twice daily, on days 1 to 21 every 28 days. At level 1, the S-1 dose was 25 mg/m2/dose (50 mg/m2/d), but it was increased by 5 mg/m2/dose for the next level. Cisplatin was administered at 75 mg/m2 (for levels 1 and 2) but was then reduced to 60 mg/m2 (level 1A). At every level, a cohort of three patients, which could be expanded to six patients, was studied. Maximum-tolerated dose (MTD) was determined based on the dose-limiting toxicity (DLT) in the first cycle. Patients with histologic proof of gastric adenocarcinoma and near-normal organ function were studied. Sixteen patients were enrolled. No DLTs occurred at level 1. However, DLTs occurred at levels 2 and 1A. The area under the curve for FU correlated significantly with DLT (P = .006) and grade 3 to 4 diarrhea (P = .004). Six partial responses were confirmed, including three at the MTD. At the established MTD of S-1 plus cisplatin, the S-1 dose (50 mg/m2/d for 21 days) is lower in our study than in the Japanese study (80 mg/m2/d for 21 days). A multi-institutional phase II study of this active combination is currently accruing patients.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Competing designs for phase I clinical trials: a review.

              Phase I clinical trials are typically small, uncontrolled studies designed to determine a maximum tolerated dose of a drug which will be used in further testing. Two divergent schools have developed in designing phase I clinical trials. The first defines the maximum tolerated dose as a statistic computed from data, and hence it is identified, rather than estimated. The second defines the maximum tolerated dose as a parameter of a monotonic dose-response curve, and hence is estimated. We review techniques from both philosophies. The goal is to present these methods in a single package, to compare them from philosophical and statistical grounds, to hopefully clear up some common misconceptions, and to make a few recommendations. This paper is not a review of simulation studies of these designs, nor does it present any new simulations comparing these designs. Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                moreno.ursino@inserm.fr
                Journal
                Biom J
                Biom J
                10.1002/(ISSN)1521-4036
                BIMJ
                Biometrical Journal. Biometrische Zeitschrift
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0323-3847
                1521-4036
                21 March 2017
                July 2017
                : 59
                : 4 , ISCB2015, MCP2015, LVM Long ( doiID: 10.1002/bimj.v59.4 )
                : 804-825
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] INSERM, UMRS 1138, team 22, CRC, University Paris 5 University Paris 6 Paris France
                [ 2 ] Federal Institute for Drugs and Medical Devices Bonn Germany
                [ 3 ] INSERM, UMR 1123, Hôpital Robert‐Debré, APHP University Paris 7 Paris France
                [ 4 ] Department of Medical Statistics University Medical Center Göttingen Göttingen Germany
                [ 5 ] Statistics and Epidemiology, Division of Health Sciences, Warwick Medical School The University of Warwick Warwick UK
                [ 6 ] INSERM, CIC 1414 University Rennes‐1 Rennes France
                [ 7 ] INSERM, IAME UMR 1137 University Paris Diderot Paris France
                Author notes
                [*] [* ]Corresponding author: e‐mail: moreno.ursino@ 123456inserm.fr
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0002-5709-4322
                Article
                BIMJ1759
                10.1002/bimj.201600084
                5573988
                28321893
                09782a1f-ebcc-477b-9e56-fa7ab104730d
                © 2017 The Authors. Biometrical Journal published by WILEY‐VCH Verlag GmbH & Co. KGaA, Weinheim

                This is an open access article under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 11 April 2016
                : 06 December 2016
                : 25 December 2016
                Page count
                Figures: 4, Tables: 5, Pages: 22, Words: 11060
                Funding
                Funded by: Seventh Framework Programme
                Award ID: FP HEALTH 2013‐602144
                Categories
                Research Paper
                General
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                bimj1759
                July 2017
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_NLMPMC version:5.1.8 mode:remove_FC converted:29.08.2017

                Quantitative & Systems biology
                dose‐finding,dose‐toxicity relationship,maximum tolerated dose,pharmacokinetics,phase i clinical trials

                Comments

                Comment on this article