11
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Amplifying the Patient Voice: Key Priorities and Opportunities for Improved Transplant and Living Donor Advocacy and Outcomes During COVID-19 and Beyond

      review-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Purpose of Review

          To define patient advocacy and engagement for modern transplant and living donation care, particularly in light of the COVID-19 pandemic, describe the patient experience when transplant advocacy and engagement are optimized, and recommend opportunities for advocacy within three key areas: (1) including the patient voice in healthcare decisions and drug development, (2) access to the best evidence-based treatments and informed decision-making, and (3) present and future care innovations and policies.

          Recent Findings

          There are many avenues for transplant and living donation advocacy and engagement at the patient, provider, family, system, community, and policy levels. Key recommendations include the following: (1) simplifying education to be health literate, written at the appropriate reading level, culturally sensitive, and available in multiple languages and across many delivery platforms, (2) inviting transplant patients and donors to the conversation through advisory panels, consensus conferences, and new mediums like digital storytelling and patient-reported outcomes (PROs), (3) training all members of the health team to understand their role as advocates, and (4) advancing policies and programs that support the financial neutrality of living donation, and support recipients with the cost of immunosuppressive drugs. Key recommendations specific to the COVID-19 pandemic include providing up-to-date, health literate, concise information about preventing COVID-19 and accessing care including telehealth.

          Summary

          Enhancing advocacy and engagement for transplant patients and donors along the pre-to-post transplant/donation continuum can improve clinical outcomes and quality of life generally, and more so, in light of the COVID-19 pandemic.

          Related collections

          Most cited references38

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: found

          Coronavirus Disease 19 Infection Does Not Result in Acute Kidney Injury: An Analysis of 116 Hospitalized Patients from Wuhan, China

          Background Whether the patients with coronavirus disease 19 (COVID-19) infected by severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS)-CoV-2 would commonly develop acute kidney injury (AKI) is an important issue worthy of clinical attention. This study aimed to explore the effects of SARS-CoV-2 infection on renal function through analyzing the clinical data of 116 hospitalized COVID-19-confirmed patients. Methods One hundred sixteen COVID-19-confirmed patients enrolled in this study were hospitalized in the Department of Infectious Diseases, Renmin Hospital of Wuhan University from January 14 to February 13, 2020. The recorded information includes demographic data, medical history, contact history, potential comorbidities, symptoms, signs, laboratory test results, chest computer tomography scans, and treatment measures. SARS-CoV-2 RNA in 53 urine sediments of enrolled patients was detected by real-time reverse transcription-polymerase chain reaction. Results Twelve (10.8%) patients showed mild increase of blood urea nitrogen or creatinine (<26 μmol/L within 48 h), and 8 (7.2%) patients showed trace or 1+ albuminuria in 111 COVID-19-confirmed patients without chronic kidney disease (CKD). All these patients did not meet the diagnostic criteria of AKI. In addition, 5 patients with CKD who were undergone regular continuous renal replacement therapy (CRRT) before admission were confirmed infection of SARS-CoV-2 and diagnosed as COVID-19. In addition to therapy for COVID-19, CRRT was also applied 3 times weekly during hospitalization for these 5 patients with CKD. In the course of treatment, the renal function indicators showed stable state in all 5 patients with CKD, without exacerbation of CKD, and pulmonary inflammation was gradually absorbed. All 5 patients with CKD were survived. Moreover, SARS-CoV-2 RNA in urine sediments was positive only in 3 patients from 48 cases without CKD, and 1 patient had a positive for SARS-CoV-2 open reading frame 1ab from 5 cases with CKD. Conclusion AKI was uncommon in COVID-19. SARS-CoV-2 infection does not result in AKI, or aggravate CKD in the COVID-19 patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Patient centeredness, cultural competence and healthcare quality.

            Cultural competence and patient centeredness are approaches to improving healthcare quality that have been promoted extensively in recent years. In this paper, we explore the historical evolution of both cultural competence and patient centeredness. In doing so, we demonstrate that early conceptual models of cultural competence and patient centeredness focused on how healthcare providers and patients might interact at the interpersonal level and that later conceptual models were expanded to consider how patients might be treated by the healthcare system as a whole. We then compare conceptual models for both cultural competence and patient centeredness at both the interpersonal and healthcare system levels to demonstrate similarities and differences. We conclude that, although the concepts have had different histories and foci, many of the core features of cultural competence and patient centeredness are the same. Each approach holds promise for improving the quality of healthcare for individual patients, communities and populations.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Racial and Ethnic Disparities in the Quality of Health Care.

              The annual National Healthcare Quality and Disparities Reports document widespread and persistent racial and ethnic disparities. These disparities result from complex interactions between patient factors related to social disadvantage, clinicians, and organizational and health care system factors. Separate and unequal systems of health care between states, between health care systems, and between clinicians constrain the resources that are available to meet the needs of disadvantaged groups, contribute to unequal outcomes, and reinforce implicit bias. Recent data suggest slow progress in many areas but have documented a few notable successes in eliminating these disparities. To eliminate these disparities, continued progress will require a collective national will to ensure health care equity through expanded health insurance coverage, support for primary care, and public accountability based on progress toward defined, time-limited objectives using evidence-based, sufficiently resourced, multilevel quality improvement strategies that engage patients, clinicians, health care organizations, and communities.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                awaterman@mednet.ucla.edu
                gleasonjim@aol.com
                louise.lerminiaux@thermofisher.com
                ehwood@mednet.ucla.edu
                berriosa1234@gmail.com
                laurie.meacham@gmail.com
                anneosuji@gmail.com
                rpines@terasaki.org
                john.peipert@northwestern.edu
                Journal
                Curr Transplant Rep
                Curr Transplant Rep
                Current Transplantation Reports
                Springer International Publishing (Cham )
                2196-3029
                1 September 2020
                : 1-10
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.19006.3e, ISNI 0000 0000 9632 6718, Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, , University of California Los Angeles, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [2 ]GRID grid.19006.3e, ISNI 0000 0000 9632 6718, Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, , University of California Los Angeles, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [3 ]Transplant Recipients International, Beverly, NJ USA
                [4 ]GRID grid.418190.5, ISNI 0000 0001 2187 0556, Transplant Diagnostics, , Thermo Fisher Scientific, ; Los Angeles, CA USA
                [5 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, Department of Medical Social Sciences, , Feinberg School of Medicine, Northwestern University, ; Chicago, IL USA
                [6 ]GRID grid.16753.36, ISNI 0000 0001 2299 3507, Comprehensive Transplant Center, Feinberg School of Medicine, , Northwestern University Transplant Outcomes Research Collaborative, ; Chicago, IL USA
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7799-0060
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7141-4732
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7847-4666
                https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5762-7881
                Article
                295
                10.1007/s40472-020-00295-x
                7462355
                097927d4-987f-458b-8598-99078d960853
                © Springer Nature Switzerland AG 2020

                This article is made available via the PMC Open Access Subset for unrestricted research re-use and secondary analysis in any form or by any means with acknowledgement of the original source. These permissions are granted for the duration of the World Health Organization (WHO) declaration of COVID-19 as a global pandemic.

                History
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000002, National Institutes of Health;
                Award ID: RO1 DK088711-01A1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Live Kidney Donation (KL Lentine and R Schaffer, Section Editor)

                patient advocacy,patient engagement,transplant,living donation,patient education,covid-19

                Comments

                Comment on this article