9
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Oncolytic Viruses for Canine Cancer Treatment

      review-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Oncolytic virotherapy has been investigated for several decades and is emerging as a plausible biological therapy with several ongoing clinical trials and two viruses are now approved for cancer treatment in humans. The direct cytotoxicity and immune-stimulatory effects make oncolytic viruses an interesting strategy for cancer treatment. In this review, we summarize the results of in vitro and in vivo published studies of oncolytic viruses in different phases of evaluation in dogs, using PubMed and Google scholar as search platforms, without time restrictions (to date). Natural and genetically modified oncolytic viruses were evaluated with some encouraging results. The most studied viruses to date are the reovirus, myxoma virus, and vaccinia, tested mostly in solid tumors such as osteosarcomas, mammary gland tumors, soft tissue sarcomas, and mastocytomas. Although the results are promising, there are issues that need addressing such as ensuring tumor specificity, developing optimal dosing, circumventing preexisting antibodies from previous exposure or the development of antibodies during treatment, and assuring a reasonable safety profile, all of which are required in order to make this approach a successful therapy in dogs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references168

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Adherens junction protein nectin-4 (PVRL4) is the epithelial receptor for measles virus

          Measles (MV) is an aerosol-transmitted virus that affects more than 10 million children each year and accounts for approximately 120,000 deaths 1,2 . While it was long believed to replicate in the respiratory epithelium before disseminating, it was recently shown to initially infect macrophages and dendritic cells of the airways using the signaling lymphocytic activation molecule (SLAM, CD150) as receptor 3-6 . These cells then cross the respiratory epithelium and ferry the infection to lymphatic organs where MV replicates vigorously 7 . How and where the virus crosses back into the airways has remained unknown. Based on functional analyses of surface proteins preferentially expressed on virus-permissive epithelial cell lines, we identified nectin-4 8 (poliovirus-receptor-like-4) as a candidate host exit receptor. This adherens junction protein of the immunoglobulin superfamily interacts with the viral attachment protein with high affinity through its membrane-distal domain. Nectin-4 sustains MV entry and non-cytopathic lateral spread in well-differentiated primary human airway epithelial sheets infected basolaterally. It is down-regulated in infected epithelial cells, including those of macaque tracheas. While other viruses use receptors to enter hosts or transit through their epithelial barriers, we suggest that MV targets nectin-4 to emerge in the airways. Nectin-4 is a cellular marker of several types of cancer 9-11 , which has implications for ongoing MV-based clinical trials of oncolysis 12 .
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: not found
            • Article: not found

            China approves world's first oncolytic virus therapy for cancer treatment.

            Ken Garber (2006)
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Mortality in north american dogs from 1984 to 2004: an investigation into age-, size-, and breed-related causes of death.

              Anecdotal beliefs and limited research suggest variable patterns of mortality in age, size, and breed cohorts of dogs. Detailed knowledge of mortality patterns would facilitate development of tailored health-maintenance practices and contribute to the understanding of the genetic basis of disease. To describe breed-specific causes of death in all instances of canine mortality recorded in the Veterinary Medical Database (VMDB)(a) between 1984 and 2004. We hypothesized that causes of death, categorized by organ system (OS) or pathophysiologic process (PP), would segregate by age, body mass, and breed. 74,556 dogs from the VMDB for which death was the outcome of the recorded hospital visit. Retrospective study. Causes of death from abstracted VMDB medical records were categorized by OS and PP and analyzed by age, breed, and breed-standard mass of dog. Causes of death, categorized by OS or PP, segregated by age, breed, and breed-standard mass. Young dogs died more commonly of gastrointestinal and infectious causes whereas older dogs died of neurologic and neoplastic causes. Increasing age was associated with an increasing risk of death because of cardiovascular, endocrine, and urogenital causes, but not because of hematopoietic or musculoskeletal causes. Dogs of larger breeds died more commonly of musculoskeletal and gastrointestinal causes whereas dogs of smaller breeds died more commonly of endocrine causes. Not all causes of death contribute equally to mortality within age, size, or breed cohorts. Documented patterns now provide multiple targets for clinical research and intervention. Copyright © 2011 by the American College of Veterinary Internal Medicine.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Cancers (Basel)
                Cancers (Basel)
                cancers
                Cancers
                MDPI
                2072-6694
                27 October 2018
                November 2018
                : 10
                : 11
                : 404
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Unidad de Investigación Biomédica en Cáncer, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología-Instituto de Investigaciones Biomédicas, Universidad Nacional Autónoma de México, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; dianasanchezc@ 123456hotmail.com (D.S.); aamadorm@ 123456incan.edu.mx (A.A.-M.)
                [2 ]Department of Hematology, Instituto Nacional de Cancerología, Mexico City 14080, Mexico; gcesarman@ 123456gmail.com
                Author notes
                [* ]Correspondence: lizano@ 123456unam.mx ; Tel.: +51-5628-0400 (ext. 31035)
                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-8397-0330
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7553-2541
                Article
                cancers-10-00404
                10.3390/cancers10110404
                6266482
                30373251
                09c525b8-7219-44a7-a36e-abd7c41ff1fa
                © 2018 by the authors.

                Licensee MDPI, Basel, Switzerland. This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY) license ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).

                History
                : 19 September 2018
                : 23 October 2018
                Categories
                Review

                oncolytic virus,canine cancer,immunotherapy,canine treatment

                Comments

                Comment on this article