16
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Assessing the choice of National Health Insurance Fund contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya: A qualitative study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objective

          To assess National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) members' level of understanding, experiences, and factors influencing their choice of NHIF‐contracted outpatient facilities in Kenya.

          Methods

          We conducted a cross‐sectional qualitative study with NHIF members in two purposefully selected counties (Nyeri and Makueni counties) in Kenya. We collected data through 15 focus group discussions with NHIF members. Data were analysed using a framework analysis approach.

          Results

          Urban‐based NHIF members had a good understanding of the NHIF‐contracted outpatient facility selection process and the approaches for choosing and changing providers, unlike their rural counterparts. While NHIF members were required to choose a provider before accessing care, the number of available alternative facilities was perceived to be inadequate. Finally, NHIF members identified seven factors they considered important when choosing an NHIF‐contracted outpatient provider. Of these factors, the availability of drugs, distance from the household to the facility and waiting time at the facility until consultation were considered the most important.

          Conclusion

          There is a need for the NHIF to prioritise awareness‐raising approaches tailored to rural settings. Further, there is a need for the NHIF to contract more providers to both spur competition among providers and provide alternatives for members to choose from. Besides, NHIF members revealed the important factors they consider when selecting outpatient facilities. Consequently, NHIF should leverage the preferred factors when contracting healthcare providers. Similarly, healthcare providers should enhance the availability of drugs, reduce waiting times whilst improving their staff's attitudes which would improve user satisfaction and the quality of care provided.

          Highlights

          • Patient choice of health facilities can enhance the attainment of health system objectives.

          • Availability of drugs, distance and waiting time are the important factors influencing National Health Insurance Fund (NHIF) members' choice of outpatient facilities.

          • NHIF should incorporate these preferences when accrediting and contracting providers

          • Awareness‐raising communication should be tailored to rural setting needs.

          Related collections

          Most cited references45

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          The use of focus group discussion methodology: Insights from two decades of application in conservation

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: found
            Is Open Access

            Determinants of patient choice of healthcare providers: a scoping review

            Background In several northwest European countries, a demand-driven healthcare system has been implemented that stresses the importance of patient healthcare provider choice. In this study, we are conducting a scoping review aiming to map out what is known about the determinants of patient choice of a wide range of healthcare providers. As far as we know, not many studies are currently available that attempt to draw a general picture of how patients choose a healthcare provider and of the status of research on this subject. This study is therefore a valuable contribution to the growing amount of literature about patient choice. Methods We carried out a specific type of literature review known as a scoping review. Scoping reviews try to examine the breadth of knowledge that is available about a particular topic and therefore do not make selections or apply quality constraints. Firstly, we defined our research questions and searched the literature in Embase, Medline and PubMed. Secondly, we selected the literature, and finally we analysed and summarized the information. Results Our review shows that patients’ choices are determined by a complex interplay between patient and provider characteristics. A variety of patient characteristics determines whether patients make choices, are willing and able to choose, and how they choose. Patients take account of a variety of structural, process and outcome characteristics of providers, differing in the relative importance they attach to these characteristics. Conclusions There is no such thing as the typical patient: different patients make different choices in different situations. Comparative information seems to have a relatively limited influence on the choices made by many patients and patients base their decisions on a variety of provider characteristics instead of solely on outcome characteristics. The assumptions made in health policy about patient choice may therefore be an oversimplification of reality. Several knowledge gaps were identified that need follow-up research.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Health financing for universal coverage and health system performance: concepts and implications for policy.

              Unless the concept is clearly understood, "universal coverage" (or universal health coverage, UHC) can be used to justify practically any health financing reform or scheme. This paper unpacks the definition of health financing for universal coverage as used in the World Health Organization's World health report 2010 to show how UHC embodies specific health system goals and intermediate objectives and, broadly, how health financing reforms can influence these. All countries seek to improve equity in the use of health services, service quality and financial protection for their populations. Hence, the pursuit of UHC is relevant to every country. Health financing policy is an integral part of efforts to move towards UHC, but for health financing policy to be aligned with the pursuit of UHC, health system reforms need to be aimed explicitly at improving coverage and the intermediate objectives linked to it, namely, efficiency, equity in health resource distribution and transparency and accountability. The unit of analysis for goals and objectives must be the population and health system as a whole. What matters is not how a particular financing scheme affects its individual members, but rather, how it influences progress towards UHC at the population level. Concern only with specific schemes is incompatible with a universal coverage approach and may even undermine UHC, particularly in terms of equity. Conversely, if a scheme is fully oriented towards system-level goals and objectives, it can further progress towards UHC. Policy and policy analysis need to shift from the scheme to the system level.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                kjacob@kemri-wellcome.org
                Journal
                Int J Health Plann Manage
                Int J Health Plann Manage
                10.1002/(ISSN)1099-1751
                HPM
                The International Journal of Health Planning and Management
                John Wiley and Sons Inc. (Hoboken )
                0749-6753
                1099-1751
                22 July 2023
                September 2023
                : 38
                : 5 ( doiID: 10.1002/hpm.v38.5 )
                : 1555-1568
                Affiliations
                [ 1 ] Health Economics Research Unit KEMRI Wellcome Trust Research Programme Nairobi Kenya
                [ 2 ] Department of Health Policy, Planning and Management School of Public Health University of Ghana Accra Ghana
                [ 3 ] Health Economics Programme Africa Centres for Disease Control and Prevention Addis Ababa Ethiopia
                [ 4 ] Department of Infectious Disease Epidemiology London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine London UK
                [ 5 ] Nuffield Department of Medicine University of Oxford Oxford UK
                Author notes
                [*] [* ] Correspondence

                Jacob Kazungu.

                Email: kjacob@ 123456kemri-wellcome.org

                Author information
                https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3138-7274
                Article
                HPM3693
                10.1002/hpm.3693
                10947030
                37483108
                09cff104-d471-4d0d-8c7c-d52b5cc7a1ec
                © 2023 The Authors. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management published by John Wiley & Sons Ltd.

                This is an open access article under the terms of the http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/ License, which permits use, distribution and reproduction in any medium, provided the original work is properly cited.

                History
                : 12 July 2023
                : 17 April 2023
                : 16 July 2023
                Page count
                Figures: 1, Tables: 1, Pages: 0, Words: 7204
                Funding
                Funded by: Wellcome Trust , doi 10.13039/100010269;
                Award ID: 212347
                Categories
                Research Article
                Research Articles
                Custom metadata
                2.0
                September 2023
                Converter:WILEY_ML3GV2_TO_JATSPMC version:6.3.9 mode:remove_FC converted:18.03.2024

                Economics of health & social care
                facility choice,kenya,national health insurance fund
                Economics of health & social care
                facility choice, kenya, national health insurance fund

                Comments

                Comment on this article