72
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Facial asymmetry: a current review

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          The term "asymmetry" is used to make reference to dissimilarity between homologous elements, altering the balance between structures. Facial asymmetry is common in the overall population and is often presented subclinically. Nevertheless, on occasion, significant facial asymmetry results not only in functional, but also esthetic issues. Under these conditions, its etiology should be carefully investigated in order to achieve an adequate treatment plan. Facial asymmetry assessment comprises patient's first interview, extra- as well as intraoral clinical examination, and supplementary imaging examination. Subsequent asymmetry treatment depends on patient's age, the etiology of the condition and on the degree of disharmony, and might include from asymmetrical orthodontic mechanics to orthognathic surgery. Thus, the present study aims at addressing important aspects to be considered by the orthodontist reaching an accurate diagnosis and treatment plan of facial asymmetry, in addition to reporting treatment of some patients carriers of such challenging disharmony.

          Resumo

          O termo assimetria é utilizado quando existe uma desigualdade entre as partes homólogas, afetando, assim, o equilíbrio entre as estruturas. A assimetria facial é comum na população, e muitas vezes se apresenta de forma subclínica. Entretanto, em alguns casos existe uma assimetria facial significativa que resulta tanto em problemas funcionais quanto estéticos. Nessas circunstâncias, a etiologia deve ser cuidadosamente investigada, para que seja possível elaborar um plano de tratamento adequado. A avaliação da assimetria facial é constituída por uma anamnese do paciente, exame clínico extra e intrabucal, além de exames complementares de imagem. O tratamento subsequente dessa assimetria depende da idade do paciente, etiologia e da magnitude da desarmonia, podendo envolver desde mecânicas ortodônticas assimétricas até a realização de cirurgia ortognática. Assim, o presente artigo busca abordar aspectos importantes para que o ortodontista possa realizar um adequado diagnóstico e plano de tratamento da assimetria facial, além de relatar o tratamento de alguns pacientes portadores dessa desafiadora desarmonia.

          Related collections

          Most cited references72

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Prevalence at birth of cleft lip with or without cleft palate: data from the International Perinatal Database of Typical Oral Clefts (IPDTOC).

          (2010)
          As part of a collaborative project on the epidemiology of craniofacial anomalies, funded by the National Institutes for Dental and Craniofacial Research and channeled through the Human Genetics Programme of the World Health Organization, the International Perinatal Database of Typical Orofacial Clefts (IPDTOC) was established in 2003. IPDTOC is collecting case-by-case information on cleft lip with or without cleft palate and on cleft palate alone from birth defects registries contributing to at least one of three collaborative organizations: European Surveillance Systems of Congenital Anomalies (EUROCAT) in Europe, National Birth Defects Prevention Network (NBDPN) in the United States, and International Clearinghouse for Birth Defects Surveillance and Research (ICBDSR) worldwide. Analysis of the collected information is performed centrally at the ICBDSR Centre in Rome, Italy, to maximize the comparability of results. The present paper, the first of a series, reports data on the prevalence of cleft lip with or without cleft palate from 54 registries in 30 countries over at least 1 complete year during the period 2000 to 2005. Thus, the denominator comprises more than 7.5 million births. A total of 7704 cases of cleft lip with or without cleft palate (7141 livebirths, 237 stillbirths, 301 terminations of pregnancy, and 25 with pregnancy outcome unknown) were available. The overall prevalence of cleft lip with or without cleft palate was 9.92 per 10,000. The prevalence of cleft lip was 3.28 per 10,000, and that of cleft lip and palate was 6.64 per 10,000. There were 5918 cases (76.8%) that were isolated, 1224 (15.9%) had malformations in other systems, and 562 (7.3%) occurred as part of recognized syndromes. Cases with greater dysmorphological severity of cleft lip with or without cleft palate were more likely to include malformations of other systems.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Facial asymmetry in subjects with skeletal Class III deformity.

            We investigated the frequency, site, amount, and direction of facial asymmetry in human adults with mandibular prognathism and examined if these characteristics were associated postnatally with cardinal clinical signs that may indicate a predisposition to facial asymmetry. Two hundred twenty young Japanese adults (69 men and 151 women) who exhibited skeletal Class III malocclusions were selected. The sample was divided into a Postnatal Factor Group and a Nonpostnatal Factor Group. The former group included those who had: (1) received orthodontic treatment using a chin cap; (2) exhibited clinical symptoms of temporomandibular joint (TMJ) disorder; (3) reported a history of maxillofacial trauma; or (4) radiographic abnormality of the condyles. Subjects with a deviation of more than 2 mm from the facial midline associated with any of the 4 landmarks (ANS, U1, L1 and Me) were classified as asymmetric and the asymmetry was measured on a postero-anterior (P-A) cephalogram. Radiographic facial asymmetry was found frequently (70%-85%, for Menton), and most obviously in the lower jaw (P < .05). Lateral displacement toward the left side of the face occurred more often than right-sided deviation (P < .001, for Menton). However, the Postnatal Factor Group showed a higher proportion of subjects with lateral deviation toward the right side (P = .0031) and a greater amount (P < .0001) of chin deviation. This was due to the fact that the subjects having TMJ problems as a postnatal factor showed no directional uniqueness in jaw deviation and exhibited a longer distance of deviation.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              The prevalence of facial asymmetry in the dentofacial deformities population at the University of North Carolina.

              In a retrospective survey of 1,460 patients evaluated in the Dentofacial Clinic at the University of North Carolina, 495 (34%) were found to have clinically apparent facial asymmetry. When present, asymmetry affected the upper face in only 5% (n = 23), the midface (primarily the nose) in 36% (n = 178), and the chin in 74% (n = 365). The occlusal plane was canted, indicating vertical asymmetry, in 41% (n = 201). Patients with Class II problems, whether or not due to mandibular deficiency, had a 28% prevalence of asymmetry; those with other types of problems (e.g., Class III, long face, Class I) had a 40% prevalence, which is significantly higher than those with Class II occlusions. When the chin deviated transversely, there was an 80% chance that the deviation was to the left. Only in patients with long face was there an equal distribution of left-right chin asymmetry. In the other groups, the prevalence of deviation of the chin to the left approached 90%. These findings are meaningful for clinicians because asymmetry must be identified and planned for prior to initiating treatment.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Dental Press J Orthod
                Dental Press J Orthod
                dpjo
                Dental Press Journal of Orthodontics
                Dental Press International
                2176-9451
                2177-6709
                Nov-Dec 2015
                Nov-Dec 2015
                : 20
                : 6
                : 110-125
                Affiliations
                [1 ]Professor, Universidade do Sul de Santa Catarina (UNISUL), Department of Orthodontics, Florianópolis, Santa Catarina, Brazil.
                [2 ]Postdoctoral fellow in Orthodontics, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, Michigan, USA.
                [3 ]Adjunct professor, Universidade Luterana do Brasil (ULBRA), Canoas, Rio Grande do Sul, Brazil.
                Author notes
                Contact address: Guilherme Thiesen Av. Madre Benvenuta, 1285 Santa Mônica - Florianópolis / SC - Brazil - CEP: 8035-001 E-mail: thiesen.guilherme@ 123456gmail.com
                Article
                10.1590/2177-6709.20.6.110-125.sar
                4686752
                26691977
                0a0c6cfe-6ae5-42c7-9e2f-b2bb142a1851

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License

                History
                : 04 August 2015
                : 11 September 2015
                Page count
                Figures: 11, Tables: 1, Equations: 0, References: 58, Pages: 16
                Categories
                Special Article

                facial asymmetry,orthodontics,orthognathic surgery
                facial asymmetry, orthodontics, orthognathic surgery

                Comments

                Comment on this article