7
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      A model for rigorously applying the Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment (EPIS) framework in the design and measurement of a large scale collaborative multi-site study

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          This paper describes the means by which a United States National Institute on Drug Abuse (NIDA)-funded cooperative, Juvenile Justice-Translational Research on Interventions for Adolescents in the Legal System (JJ-TRIALS), utilized an established implementation science framework in conducting a multi-site, multi-research center implementation intervention initiative. The initiative aimed to bolster the ability of juvenile justice agencies to address unmet client needs related to substance use while enhancing inter-organizational relationships between juvenile justice and local behavioral health partners.

          Methods

          The EPIS (Exploration, Preparation, Implementation, Sustainment) framework was selected and utilized as the guiding model from inception through project completion; including the mapping of implementation strategies to EPIS stages, articulation of research questions, and selection, content, and timing of measurement protocols. Among other key developments, the project led to a reconceptualization of its governing implementation science framework into cyclical form as the EPIS Wheel. The EPIS Wheel is more consistent with rapid-cycle testing principles and permits researchers to track both progressive and recursive movement through EPIS. Moreover, because this randomized controlled trial was predicated on a bundled strategy method, JJ-TRIALS was designed to rigorously test progress through the EPIS stages as promoted by facilitation of data-driven decision making principles. The project extended EPIS by (1) elucidating the role and nature of recursive activity in promoting change (yielding the circular EPIS Wheel), (2) by expanding the applicability of the EPIS framework beyond a single evidence-based practice (EBP) to address varying process improvement efforts (representing varying EBPs), and (3) by disentangling outcome measures of progression through EPIS stages from the a priori established study timeline.

          Discussion

          The utilization of EPIS in JJ-TRIALS provides a model for practical and applied use of implementation frameworks in real-world settings that span outer service system and inner organizational contexts in improving care for vulnerable populations.

          Trial registration

          NCT02672150. Retrospectively registered on 22 January 2016.

          Related collections

          Most cited references21

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          A compilation of strategies for implementing clinical innovations in health and mental health.

          Efforts to identify, develop, refine, and test strategies to disseminate and implement evidence-based treatments have been prioritized in order to improve the quality of health and mental health care delivery. However, this task is complicated by an implementation science literature characterized by inconsistent language use and inadequate descriptions of implementation strategies. This article brings more depth and clarity to implementation research and practice by presenting a consolidated compilation of discrete implementation strategies, based on a review of 205 sources published between 1995 and 2011. The resulting compilation includes 68 implementation strategies and definitions, which are grouped according to six key implementation processes: planning, educating, financing, restructuring, managing quality, and attending to the policy context. This consolidated compilation can serve as a reference to stakeholders who wish to implement clinical innovations in health and mental health care and can facilitate the development of multifaceted, multilevel implementation plans that are tailored to local contexts.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            The effects of organizational climate and interorganizational coordination on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems.

            This study examines the effects of organizational characteristics, including organizational climate and interorganizational coordination, on the quality and outcomes of children's service systems. A quasi-experimental, longitudinal design was used to assess the effects of increasing interorganizational services coordination in public children's service agencies. The research team collected both qualitative and quantitative data over a 3-year period describing the services provided to 250 children by 32 public children's service offices in 24 counties in Tennessee. Findings show that organizational climate (including low conflict, cooperation, role clarity, and personalization) is the primary predictor of positive service outcomes (the children's improved psychosocial functioning) and a significant predictor of service quality. In contrast, interorganizational coordination had a negative effect on service quality and no effect on outcomes. Efforts to improve public children's service systems should focus on creating positive organizational climates rather than on increasing interorganizational services coordination. This is important because many large-scale efforts to improve children's service systems have focused on interorganizational coordination with little success and none to date have focused on organizational climate.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Dissemination and implementation of evidence-based practices for child and adolescent mental health: a systematic review.

              Although there has been a dramatic increase in the number of evidence-based practices (EBPs) to improve child and adolescent mental health, the poor uptake of these EBPs has led to investigations of factors related to their successful dissemination and implementation. The purpose of this systematic review was to identify key findings from empirical studies examining the dissemination and implementation of EBPs for child and adolescent mental health. Of 14,247 citations initially identified, 73 articles drawn from 44 studies met inclusion criteria. The articles were classified by implementation phase (exploration, preparation, implementation, and sustainment) and specific implementation factors examined. These factors were divided into outer (i.e., system level) and inner (i.e., organizational level) contexts. Few studies used true experimental designs; most were observational. Of the many inner context factors that were examined in these studies (e.g., provider characteristics, organizational resources, leadership), fidelity monitoring and supervision had the strongest empirical evidence. Albeit the focus of fewer studies, implementation interventions focused on improving organizational climate and culture were associated with better intervention sustainment as well as child and adolescent outcomes. Outer contextual factors such as training and use of specific technologies to support intervention use were also important in facilitating the implementation process. The further development and testing of dissemination and implementation strategies is needed to more efficiently move EBPs into usual care. Copyright © 2013 American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                (817) 257-7226 , j.becan@tcu.edu
                Journal
                Health Justice
                Health Justice
                Health & Justice
                Springer Berlin Heidelberg (Berlin/Heidelberg )
                2194-7899
                13 April 2018
                13 April 2018
                December 2018
                : 6
                : 9
                Affiliations
                [1 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2289 1930, GRID grid.264766.7, Institute of Behavioral Research, , Texas Christian University, ; Box 298740, Fort Worth, TX 76129 USA
                [2 ]ISNI 0000000121845633, GRID grid.215352.2, Department of Sociology, , University of Texas at San Antonio, ; San Antonio, TX USA
                [3 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0533 7147, GRID grid.420090.f, National Institute on Drug Abuse, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                [4 ]ISNI 0000 0001 0941 6502, GRID grid.189967.8, Rollins School of Public Health, , Emory University, ; Atlanta, GA USA
                [5 ]ISNI 0000 0004 0481 4802, GRID grid.420085.b, National Institute on Alcohol Abuse and Alcoholism, ; Bethesda, MD USA
                [6 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2248 3398, GRID grid.264727.2, Department of Criminal Justice, , Temple University, ; Philadelphia, PA USA
                [7 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 9473, GRID grid.253264.4, Heller School for Social Policy and Management, , Brandeis University, ; Waltham, MA USA
                [8 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8606, GRID grid.26790.3a, Health Economics Research Group, , University of Miami, ; Miami, FL USA
                [9 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 738X, GRID grid.213876.9, College of Public Health, Epidemiology and Biostatistics, , University of Georgia, ; Athens, GA USA
                [10 ]ISNI 0000 0004 1936 8438, GRID grid.266539.d, Behavioral Science, , University of Kentucky, ; Lexington, KY USA
                [11 ]The National Center on Addiction and Substance Abuse, New York, NY USA
                [12 ]ISNI 0000 0001 2107 4242, GRID grid.266100.3, Department of Psychiatry, and Child and Adolescent Services Research Center, , University of California, ; San Diego, CA USA
                Article
                68
                10.1186/s40352-018-0068-3
                5899075
                29654518
                0a1b6159-75cc-4c90-84ac-3bf4d45df8aa
                © The Author(s). 2018

                Open AccessThis article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License ( http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.

                History
                : 20 November 2017
                : 2 April 2018
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100000026, National Institute on Drug Abuse;
                Award ID: U01DA036221
                Award ID: U01DA036226
                Award ID: U01DA036233
                Award ID: U01DA036176
                Award ID: U01DA036225
                Award ID: U01DA036224
                Award ID: U01DA036158
                Award ID: R21DA044378
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Study Protocol
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2018

                conceptual frameworks,exploration, preparation, implementation, sustainment,juvenile justice,substance use,data-driven decision making,facilitation

                Comments

                Comment on this article