10
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Critical incidents in anorexia nervosa: perspectives of those with a lived experience

      research-article

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Background

          Although social-emotional difficulties are believed play a key role in anorexia nervosa (AN), there is uncertainty regarding what these difficulties might look like. Previous research has largely focused on a “disease model” of social-emotional processing in AN with little attention paid to positive emotions and experiences. Therefore, the aim of the present study was to obtain a fuller picture of critical life events as identified by those with lived AN experience.

          Methods

          Thirty-four participants aged 16–48 with current or past AN completed an online survey describing self-defined positive and difficult critical events. Thematic analysis was used to assess patterns in participants narrative responses.

          Results

          Two major themes were identified in the descriptions of positive critical events: Moments of celebration and Unexpected positive outcomes. These major themes revealed increased external focus and some corrective experiences that challenged the participants pre-existing expectations leading to new positive outcomes. Difficult events clustered into life events that were identified as Eating disorder (ED) related and Non-ED related and included the dimensions of relational conflict and feeling unsupported.

          Discussion

          The findings suggest that although negative emotionality was identified in the accounts of those with lived experience of AN capacity for “ big-picture” thinking with and explicit focus on others was also identified. Moreover, an openness to corrective experiences that worked to challenge negative expectations was evident for some participants. Together these findings have scope as targets for further clinical research and treatment interventions.

          Supplementary Information

          The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1186/s40337-021-00409-5.

          Related collections

          Most cited references62

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: not found
          • Article: not found

          Using thematic analysis in psychology

            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Individual differences in two emotion regulation processes: implications for affect, relationships, and well-being.

            Five studies tested two general hypotheses: Individuals differ in their use of emotion regulation strategies such as reappraisal and suppression, and these individual differences have implications for affect, well-being, and social relationships. Study 1 presents new measures of the habitual use of reappraisal and suppression. Study 2 examines convergent and discriminant validity. Study 3 shows that reappraisers experience and express greater positive emotion and lesser negative emotion, whereas suppressors experience and express lesser positive emotion, yet experience greater negative emotion. Study 4 indicates that using reappraisal is associated with better interpersonal functioning, whereas using suppression is associated with worse interpersonal functioning. Study 5 shows that using reappraisal is related positively to well-being, whereas using suppression is related negatively.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Assessment of eating disorders: interview or self-report questionnaire?

              A detailed comparison was made of two methods for assessing the features of eating disorders. An investigator-based interview was compared with a self-report questionnaire based directly on that interview. A number of important discrepancies emerged. Although the two measures performed similarly with respect to the assessment of unambiguous behavioral features such as self-induced vomiting and dieting, the self-report questionnaire generated higher scores than the interview when assessing more complex features such as binge eating and concerns about shape. Both methods underestimated body weight.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                jenni.leppanen@kcl.ac.uk
                Journal
                J Eat Disord
                J Eat Disord
                Journal of Eating Disorders
                BioMed Central (London )
                2050-2974
                19 April 2021
                19 April 2021
                2021
                : 9
                : 53
                Affiliations
                [1 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, Department of Neuroimaging, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, , King’s College London, ; London, UK
                [2 ]GRID grid.13097.3c, ISNI 0000 0001 2322 6764, Department of Psychological Medicine, Institute of Psychology, Psychiatry and Neuroscience, , King’s College London, ; 103 Denmark Hill, London, SE5 8AF UK
                [3 ]GRID grid.37640.36, ISNI 0000 0000 9439 0839, South London and Maudsley NHS Foundation Trust National Eating Disorder Service, ; London, UK
                [4 ]Psychology Department, Illia State University, Tbilisi, Georgia
                [5 ]GRID grid.5337.2, ISNI 0000 0004 1936 7603, School of Education, , University of Bristol, ; Bristol, UK
                Author information
                http://orcid.org/0000-0003-2814-4375
                Article
                409
                10.1186/s40337-021-00409-5
                8054426
                0a26bce9-538a-4a22-a186-b03b303a2546
                © The Author(s) 2021

                Open AccessThis article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/. The Creative Commons Public Domain Dedication waiver ( http://creativecommons.org/publicdomain/zero/1.0/) applies to the data made available in this article, unless otherwise stated in a credit line to the data.

                History
                : 22 September 2020
                : 7 April 2021
                Funding
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/100004440, Wellcome Trust;
                Award ID: 213578/Z/18/Z
                Award Recipient :
                Funded by: FundRef http://dx.doi.org/10.13039/501100009187, Medical Research Foundation;
                Award ID: MR/R004595/1
                Award Recipient :
                Categories
                Research Article
                Custom metadata
                © The Author(s) 2021

                anorexia nervosa,critical events,positive experiences,difficult experiences,information processing bias,thematic analysis

                Comments

                Comment on this article