21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: not found

      Characterization of Occupational Exposures to Respirable Silica and Dust in Demolition, Crushing, and Chipping Activities

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Objectives

          Exposures to respirable crystalline silica (RCS) and respirable dust (RD) were investigated during demolition, crushing, and chipping at several Massachusetts construction sites.

          Methods

          Personal breathing zone samples ( n = 51) were collected on operating engineers working at demolition and crushing sites, laborers performing miscellaneous tasks at demolition sites, crushing machine tenders at crushing sites, and chipping workers at substructure bridge repair sites. Area samples ( n = 33) were collected at the perimeter of demolition and crushing sites to assess potential bystanders’ exposures. Exposures ‘with’ and ‘without’ the use of dust suppression methods were compared when possible. RD samples were analyzed for crystalline silica content with Fourier Transform Infrared Spectrophotometry (FT-IR) according to the National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health (NIOSH) Method 7602. Statistical analyses of the exposure data were performed in SAS version 9.4.

          Results

          Chipping workers had the highest exposure levels [the geometric mean (GM) time-weighted average (TWA) for RCS was 527 µg/m 3 and the GM for RD was 4750 µg/m 3]. The next highest exposures were among crushing machine tenders (RCS GM of 93.3 µg/m 3 and RD GM of 737.6 µg/m 3), while laborers and operating engineers had the lowest exposures (RCS GM of 17.0 and 6.2 µg/m 3, respectively). Personal 8-h TWA RCS exposures were higher than the new OSHA permissible exposure limit (PEL) of 50 µg/m 3 for 80% of samples collected on chipping workers ( n = 31) and 50% of samples collected on crushing machine tenders ( n = 8). Operating engineers ( n = 9) and laborers ( n = 3) had RCS exposures lower than OSHA PEL. The highest concentrations measured would have exceeded the PEL within 15 min chipping and within 2 h of crushing with no further exposure. Chipping workers’ RCS exposures were higher than OSHA PEL even when they were adjusted to account for the assigned protection factor of the half-face N95 cartridge respirators used during chipping. Exposures of crushing tenders were reduced to levels under the OSHA PEL when a water spraying system in crushing machines was utilized, but not when a water cannon machine was used. Area samples at demolition and crushing sites indicate overall lower exposures than the PEL, however, bystander workers at crushing sites could be exposed to higher levels compared to demolition sites. Real-time dust monitoring during demolition indicate very high short-term peak exposures.

          Conclusions

          Controlling or reducing crystalline silica exposures to levels under the new OSHA PEL of 50 µg/m 3 remains challenging for chipping workers and crushing machine tenders. Even with the use of dust suppression controls, respiratory protection may be required for various tasks.

          Related collections

          Author and article information

          Journal
          Ann Work Expo Health
          Ann Work Expo Health
          annhyg
          Annals of Work Exposures and Health
          Oxford University Press (UK )
          2398-7308
          2398-7316
          January 2019
          31 October 2018
          07 January 2020
          : 63
          : 1
          : 34-44
          Affiliations
          [1 ] Department of Public Health, University of Massachusetts Lowell , Lowell, MA, USA
          [2 ] Environmental Health & Engineering , Newton, MA, USA
          [3 ] United States Navy, Board of Inspection and Survey , Virginia Beach, VA, USA
          [4 ] On-Site Consultation Program, MA Department of Labor Standards , Lawrence, MA, USA
          Author notes
          Author to whom correspondence should be addressed. E-mail: anila_bello@ 123456uml.edu
          Article
          PMC6937621 PMC6937621 6937621 wxy089
          10.1093/annweh/wxy089
          6937621
          30379992
          0a388e4b-4ba1-4610-86e5-85a78355db7e
          © The Author(s) 2018. Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the British Occupational Hygiene Society.

          This article is published and distributed under the terms of the Oxford University Press, Standard Journals Publication Model ( https://academic.oup.com/journals/pages/open_access/funder_policies/chorus/standard_publication_model)

          History
          : 21 March 2018
          : 17 September 2018
          : 04 October 2018
          Page count
          Pages: 11
          Funding
          Funded by: National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health 10.13039/100000125
          Funded by: Center for Construction Research and Training
          Award ID: U60-OH009762
          Funded by: National Institutes of Health 10.13039/100000002
          Categories
          Original Articles

          crushing,respirable dust,demolition,respirable crystalline silica,construction,chipping

          Comments

          Comment on this article