39
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
1 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      The British Society of Gastroenterology/UK-PBC primary biliary cholangitis treatment and management guidelines

      research-article

      Read this article at

      ScienceOpenPublisherPMC
      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Primary biliary cholangitis (formerly known as primary biliary cirrhosis, PBC) is an autoimmune liver disease in which a cycle of immune mediated biliary epithelial cell injury, cholestasis and progressive fibrosis can culminate over time in an end-stage biliary cirrhosis. Both genetic and environmental influences are presumed relevant to disease initiation. PBC is most prevalent in women and those over the age of 50, but a spectrum of disease is recognised in adult patients globally; male sex, younger age at onset (<45) and advanced disease at presentation are baseline predictors of poorer outcome. As the disease is increasingly diagnosed through the combination of cholestatic serum liver tests and the presence of antimitochondrial antibodies, most presenting patients are not cirrhotic and the term cholangitis is more accurate. Disease course is frequently accompanied by symptoms that can be burdensome for patients, and management of patients with PBC must address, in a life-long manner, both disease progression and symptom burden. Licensed therapies include ursodeoxycholic acid (UDCA) and obeticholic acid (OCA), alongside experimental new and re-purposed agents. Disease management focuses on initiation of UDCA for all patients and risk stratification based on baseline and on-treatment factors, including in particular the response to treatment. Those intolerant of treatment with UDCA or those with high-risk disease as evidenced by UDCA treatment failure (frequently reflected in trial and clinical practice as an alkaline phosphatase >1.67 × upper limit of normal and/or elevated bilirubin) should be considered for second-line therapy, of which OCA is the only currently licensed National Institute for Health and Care Excellence recommended agent. Follow-up of patients is life-long and must address treatment of the disease and management of associated symptoms.

          Related collections

          Most cited references247

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: The diagnosis and management of patients with primary biliary cholangitis

          Primary biliary cholangitis (PBC) is a chronic inflammatory autoimmune cholestatic liver disease, which when untreated will culminate in end-stage biliary cirrhosis. Diagnosis is usually based on the presence of serum liver tests indicative of a cholestatic hepatitis in association with circulating antimitochondrial antibodies. Patient presentation and course can be diverse and risk stratification is important to ensure all patients receive a personalised approach to their care. The goals of treatment and management are the prevention of end-stage liver disease, and the amelioration of associated symptoms. Pharmacologic approaches in practice, to reduce the impact of the progressive nature of disease, currently include licensed therapies (ursodeoxycholic acid and obeticholic acid) and off-label therapies (fibric acid derivatives, budesonide). These clinical practice guidelines summarise the evidence for the importance of a structured, life-long and individualised, approach to the care of patients with PBC, providing a framework to help clinicians diagnose and effectively manage patients.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Determination of reliability criteria for liver stiffness evaluation by transient elastography.

            Liver stiffness evaluation (LSE) is usually considered as reliable when it fulfills all the following criteria: ≥10 valid measurements, ≥60% success rate, and interquartile range / median ratio (IQR/M) ≤0.30. However, such reliable LSE have never been shown to be more accurate than unreliable LSE. Thus, we aimed to evaluate the relevance of the usual definition for LSE reliability, and to improve reliability by using diagnostic accuracy as a primary outcome in a large population. 1,165 patients with chronic liver disease from 19 French centers were included. All patients had liver biopsy and LSE. 75.7% of LSE were reliable according to the usual definition. However, these reliable LSE were not significantly more accurate than unreliable LSE with, respectively: 85.8% versus 81.5% well-classified patients for the diagnosis of cirrhosis (P = 0.082). In multivariate analyses with different diagnostic targets, LSE median and IQR/M were independent predictors of fibrosis staging, with no significant influence of ≥10 valid measurements or LSE success rate. These two reliability criteria determined three LSE groups: "very reliable" (IQR/M ≤0.10), "reliable" (0.10 0.30 with LSE median 0.30 with LSE median ≥7.1 kPa). The rates of well-classified patients for the diagnosis of cirrhosis were, respectively: 90.4%, 85.8%, and 69.5% (P < 10(-3) ). According to these new reliability criteria, 9.1% of LSE were poorly reliable (versus 24.3% unreliable LSE with the usual definition, P < 10(-3) ), 74.3% were reliable, and 16.6% were very reliable. The usual definition for LSE reliability is not relevant. LSE reliability depends on IQR/M according to liver stiffness median level, defining thus three reliability categories: very reliable, reliable, and poorly reliable LSE. (HEPATOLOGY 2013). Copyright © 2012 American Association for the Study of Liver Diseases.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Beta-blockers to prevent gastroesophageal varices in patients with cirrhosis.

              Nonselective beta-adrenergic blockers decrease portal pressure and prevent variceal hemorrhage. Their effectiveness in preventing varices is unknown. We randomly assigned 213 patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension (minimal hepatic venous pressure gradient [HVPG] of 6 mm Hg) to receive timolol, a nonselective beta-blocker (108 patients), or placebo (105 patients). The primary end point was the development of gastroesophageal varices or variceal hemorrhage. Endoscopy and HVPG measurements were repeated yearly. During a median follow-up of 54.9 months, the rate of the primary end point did not differ significantly between the timolol group and the placebo group (39 percent and 40 percent, respectively; P=0.89), nor were there significant differences in the rates of ascites, encephalopathy, liver transplantation, or death. Serious adverse events were more common among patients in the timolol group than among those in the placebo group (18 percent vs. 6 percent, P=0.006). Varices developed less frequently among patients with a baseline HVPG of less than 10 mm Hg and among those in whom the HVPG decreased by more than 10 percent at one year and more frequently among those in whom the HVPG increased by more than 10 percent at one year. Nonselective beta-blockers are ineffective in preventing varices in unselected patients with cirrhosis and portal hypertension and are associated with an increased number of adverse events. (ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00006398.) Copyright 2005 Massachusetts Medical Society.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Journal
                Gut
                Gut
                gutjnl
                gut
                Gut
                BMJ Publishing Group (BMA House, Tavistock Square, London, WC1H 9JR )
                0017-5749
                1468-3288
                September 2018
                28 March 2018
                : 67
                : 9
                : 1568-1594
                Affiliations
                [1 ] NIHR Birmingham Biomedical Research Centre , Birmingham, UK
                [2 ] University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham, UK
                [3 ] departmentCentre for Liver Research , Institute of Immunology and Immunotherapy, University of Birmingham , Birmingham, UK
                [4 ] Newcastle upon Tyne Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [5 ] departmentInstitute of Cellular Medicine , Newcastle University , Newcastle upon Tyne, UK
                [6 ] NIHR Newcastle Biomedical Research Centre , Newcastle, United Kingdom
                [7 ] Sheila Sherlock Liver Centre, Royal Free London NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                [8 ] departmentUCL Institute for Liver and Digestive Health, Division of Medicine , University College London , London, UK
                [9 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , University College London Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust , London, UK
                [10 ] departmentTranslational Gastroenterology Unit , Oxford University Hospitals, University of Oxford , Oxford, UK
                [11 ] departmentDepartment of Cellular Pathology , University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust , Birmingham, UK
                [12 ] departmentDepartment of Gastroenterology , Royal Liverpool and Broadgreen University Hospitals NHS Trust , Liverpool, UK
                [13 ] University of Liverpool , Liverpool, UK
                [14 ] PBC Foundation , Edinburgh, UK
                [15 ] PSC Support , Didcot, UK
                Author notes
                [Correspondence to ] Professor Gideon M Hirschfield; g.hirschfield@ 123456bham.ac.uk
                Article
                gutjnl-2017-315259
                10.1136/gutjnl-2017-315259
                6109281
                29593060
                0a91b816-e6bf-4d44-b7cc-cdfed1c15de5
                © Article author(s) (or their employer(s) unless otherwise stated in the text of the article) 2018. All rights reserved. No commercial use is permitted unless otherwise expressly granted.

                This is an open access article distributed in accordance with the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution (CC BY 4.0) license, which permits others to distribute, remix, adapt and build upon this work, for commercial use, provided the original work is properly cited. See: http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/

                History
                : 11 September 2017
                : 22 January 2018
                : 23 January 2018
                Categories
                Guidelines
                1506
                2312
                Custom metadata
                unlocked

                Gastroenterology & Hepatology
                autoimmune liver disease,care pathway,guidelines,ursodeoxycholic acid,obeticholic acid

                Comments

                Comment on this article