21
views
0
recommends
+1 Recommend
0 collections
    0
    shares
      • Record: found
      • Abstract: found
      • Article: found
      Is Open Access

      Robot-Assisted, Laparoscopic, and Open Radical Cystectomy: Pre-Operative Data of 1400 Patients From The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry

      research-article
      1 , , 2 , 3 , 4 , 3 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 6 , 8 , 2 , 2 , 2 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 9 , 10 , 10 , 10 , 6 , 8 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 13 , 8 , 11 , 6 , 8 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 3 , 21 , 21
      Frontiers in Oncology
      Frontiers Media S.A.
      urinary bladder neoplasms, radical cystectomy, multicenter, Italy, RIC

      Read this article at

      Bookmark
          There is no author summary for this article yet. Authors can add summaries to their articles on ScienceOpen to make them more accessible to a non-specialist audience.

          Abstract

          Introduction

          The Italian Radical Cystectomy Registry (RIC) is an observational prospective study aiming to understand clinical variables and patient characteristics associated with short- and long-term outcomes among bladder cancer (BC) patients undergoing radical cystectomy (RC). Moreover, it compares the effectiveness of three RC techniques - open, robotic, and laparoscopic.

          Methods

          From 2017 to 2020, 1400 patients were enrolled at one of the 28 centers across Italy. Patient characteristics, as well as preoperative, postoperative, and follow-up (3, 6, 12, and 24 months) clinical variables and outcomes were collected.

          Results

          Preoperatively, it was found that patients undergoing robotic procedures were younger (p<.001) and more likely to have undergone preoperative neoadjuvant chemotherapy (p<.001) and BCG instillation (p<.001). Hypertension was the most common comorbidity among all patients (55%), and overall, patients undergoing open and laparoscopic RC had a higher Charlson Comorbidities Index (CCI) compared to robotic RC (p<.001). Finally, laparoscopic patients had a lower G-stage classification (p=.003) and open patients had a higher ASA score (p<.001).

          Conclusion

          The present study summarizes the characteristic of patients included in the RIC. Future results will provide invaluable information about outcomes among BC patients undergoing RC. This will inform physicians about the best techniques and course of care based on patient clinical factors and characteristics.

          Related collections

          Most cited references24

          • Record: found
          • Abstract: found
          • Article: not found

          Bladder Cancer Incidence and Mortality: A Global Overview and Recent Trends.

          Bladder cancer has become a common cancer globally, with an estimated 430 000 new cases diagnosed in 2012.
            Bookmark
            • Record: found
            • Abstract: found
            • Article: not found

            Postoperative nomogram predicting risk of recurrence after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer.

            Radical cystectomy and pelvic lymphadenectomy (PLND) remains the standard treatment for localized and regionally advanced invasive bladder cancers. We have constructed an international bladder cancer database from centers of excellence in the management of bladder cancer consisting of patients treated with radical cystectomy and PLND. The goal of this study was the development of a prognostic outcomes nomogram to predict the 5-year disease recurrence risk after radical cystectomy. Institutional radical cystectomy databases containing detailed information on bladder cancer patients were obtained from 12 centers of excellence worldwide. Data were collected on more than 9,000 postoperative patients and combined into a relational database formatted with patient characteristics, pathologic details of the pre- and postcystectomy specimens, and recurrence and survival status. Patients with available information for all selected study criteria were included in the formation of the final prognostic nomogram designed to predict 5-year progression-free probability. The final nomogram included information on patient age, sex, time from diagnosis to surgery, pathologic tumor stage and grade, tumor histologic subtype, and regional lymph node status. The predictive accuracy of the constructed international nomogram (concordance index, 0.75) was significantly better than standard American Joint Committee on Cancer TNM (concordance index, 0.68; P < .001) or standard pathologic subgroupings (concordance index, 0.62; P < .001). We have developed an international bladder cancer nomogram predicting recurrence risk after radical cystectomy for bladder cancer. The nomogram outperformed prognostic models that use standard pathologic subgroupings and should improve our ability to provide accurate risk assessments to patients after the surgical management of bladder cancer.
              Bookmark
              • Record: found
              • Abstract: found
              • Article: not found

              Defining early morbidity of radical cystectomy for patients with bladder cancer using a standardized reporting methodology.

              Reporting methodology is highly variable and nonstandardized, yet surgical outcomes are utilized in clinical trial design and evaluation of healthcare provider performance. We sought to define the type, incidence, and severity of early postoperative morbidities following radical cystectomy (RC) using a standardized reporting methodology. Between 1995 and 2005, 1142 consecutive RCs were entered into a prospective complication database and retrospectively reviewed for accuracy. All patients underwent RC/urinary diversion by high-volume fellowship-trained urologic oncologists. All complications within 90 d of surgery were analyzed and graded according to the Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center complication grading system. Complications were defined and stratified into 11 specific categories. Univariate and multivariate regression models were used to define predictors of complications. Sixty-four percent (735/1142) of patients experienced a complication within 90 d of surgery. Among patients experiencing a complication, 67% experienced a complication during the operative hospital admission and 58% following discharge. Overall, the highest grade of complication was grade 0 in 36% (n=407), grade 1-2 in 51% (n=582), and grade 3-5 in 13% (n=153). Gastrointestinal complications were most common (29%), followed by infectious complications (25%) and wound-related complications (15%). The 30-d mortality rate was 1.5%. Surgical morbidity following RC is significant and, when strict reporting guidelines are incorporated, higher than previously published. Accurate reporting of postoperative complications after RC is essential for counseling patients, combined modality treatment planning, clinical trial design, and assessment of surgical success.
                Bookmark

                Author and article information

                Contributors
                Journal
                Front Oncol
                Front Oncol
                Front. Oncol.
                Frontiers in Oncology
                Frontiers Media S.A.
                2234-943X
                05 May 2022
                2022
                : 12
                : 895460
                Affiliations
                [1] 1Department of Urology and Renal Transplantation, University of Foggia, Policlinico Riuniti , Foggia, Italy
                [2] 2Department of Urology, Villa Salus Clinic , Mestre, Italy
                [3] 3Department of Urology, Policlinico Abano Terme , Abano Terme, Italy
                [4] 4Department of Internal Medicine and Geriatrics, University Cattolica del Sacro Cuore , Rome, Italy
                [5] 5Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera Universitaria Integrata (A.O.U.I.) , Verona, Italy
                [6] 6Department of Urology, University of Bologna , Bologna, Italy
                [7] 7Department of Urology, Niguarda Hospital , Milano, Italy
                [8] 8Department of Urology, University of Florence , Florence, Italy
                [9] 9Department of Maternal-Child and Urological Sciences, Sapienza Rome University, Policlinico Umberto I , Rome, Italy
                [10] 10Department of Urology, European Institute of Oncology (IEO), IRCCS , Milan, Italy
                [11] 11Department of Urology, San Raffaele Hospital and Scientific Institute , Milan, Italy
                [12] 12Department of Urology, Galliera Hospital , Genoa, Italy
                [13] 13Department of Urology, University of Perugia , Perugia, Italy
                [14] 14Department of Urology, University of Brescia , Brescia, Italy
                [15] 15Department of Urology, Azienda Socio Sanitaria Territoriale (ASST) Mantova , Mantova, Italy
                [16] 16Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliera di Alessandria , Alessandria, Italy
                [17] 17Department of Urology, Ca’ Foncello Hospital , Treviso, Italy
                [18] 18Department of Urology, Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Pisana , Pisa, Italy
                [19] 19Department of Emergency and Organ Transplantation, Urology, Andrology and Kidney Transplantation Unit, University of Bari , Bari, Italy
                [20] 20Department of Surgical, Oncological and Oral Sciences, Section of Urology, University of Palermo , Palermo, Italy
                [21] 21Oncological Urology, Veneto Institute of Oncology (IOV) – Istituto di Ricovero e Cura a Carattere Scientifico (IRCCS) , Padua, Italy
                Author notes

                Edited by: Andrea Mari, Careggi University Hospital, Italy

                Reviewed by: Michele Marchioni, University of Studies G. d’Annunzio Chieti and Pescara, Italy; Felice Crocetto, Federico II University Hospital, Italy

                *Correspondence: Gian Maria Busetto, gianmaria.busetto@ 123456unifg.it

                This article was submitted to Genitourinary Oncology, a section of the journal Frontiers in Oncology

                Article
                10.3389/fonc.2022.895460
                9117739
                35600337
                0aadb76b-48d5-40cd-b52c-f334d5bc4744
                Copyright © 2022 Busetto, D’Agostino, Colicchia, Palmer, Artibani, Antonelli, Bianchi, Bocciardi, Brunocilla, Carini, Carrieri, Cormio, Falagario, De Berardinis, Sciarra, Leonardo, Del Giudice, Maggi, de Cobelli, Ferro, Musi, Ercolino, Di Maida, Gallina, Introini, Mearini, Cochetti, Minervini, Montorsi, Schiavina, Serni, Simeone, Parma, Serao, Mangano, Pomara, Ditonno, Simonato, Romagnoli, Crestani and Porreca

                This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License (CC BY). The use, distribution or reproduction in other forums is permitted, provided the original author(s) and the copyright owner(s) are credited and that the original publication in this journal is cited, in accordance with accepted academic practice. No use, distribution or reproduction is permitted which does not comply with these terms.

                History
                : 13 March 2022
                : 06 April 2022
                Page count
                Figures: 2, Tables: 4, Equations: 0, References: 24, Pages: 8, Words: 3666
                Funding
                Funded by: Istituto Oncologico Veneto , doi 10.13039/501100009414;
                Categories
                Oncology
                Original Research

                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                urinary bladder neoplasms,radical cystectomy,multicenter,italy,ric
                Oncology & Radiotherapy
                urinary bladder neoplasms, radical cystectomy, multicenter, italy, ric

                Comments

                Comment on this article